Dependent Origination - The origin of symmetrically zero (Suñña/Śūnya) worlds (Loka) and space - Page 4

  • Lanka E-World Technologies
Does the total mass contain both matter and antimatter masses?
If the total mass is interdependent, then does the total mass contain both matter and antimatter masses like this:
Mass = Matter × Antimatter.
E.g. (hypothetical),
The Proton's mass == Antimatter(59×31×31×3×3) × Matter(59×31) × 1.005303472855531 eV/c^2?
The Down Quark’s mass == Matter(59×31×31×3×3×3) × Antimatter(3) × 1.023381212332223 eV/c^2?
The Up Quark’s mass == Antimatter(59×31×31×3×3×2) × Matter(2) × 1.077816383200958 eV/c^2?
The Electron’s mass == Matter(59×31×31×3×3) × Antimatter(1) × 1.001387338009097 eV/c^2?
Proton’s Charge = 2×(An(59×31×31×3×3×2)×M(2)) - M(59×31×31×3×3×3)×An(3) = An(59×31×31×3×3×1)×M(1)
But electrons don’t need extra matter or antimatter to be balanced. Therefore, only protons could have a Charge.
The Muon’s mass == Matter(59×59×31×31×31) × Antimatter(1) × 1.01886073187205 eV/c^2?
The Tau’s mass == Matter(59×59×59×31×31×3×3) × Antimatter(1) × 1.000302326214752 eV/c^2?
The Strange Quark’s mass == Matter(59×59×31×31×3×3) × Antimatter(3) × 1.051798216785732 eV/c^2?
The Bottom Quark’s mass == Matter(59×59×59×31×31×(3 + 4)) × Antimatter(3) × 1.008503859194067 eV/c^2?
The Charm Quark’s mass == Antimatter(59×59×31×31×31×3×2) × Matter(2) × 1.024565750222095 eV/c^2?
The Top Quark’s mass == Antimatter(59×59×59×31×31×31×2×(3 + 4)) × Matter(2) × 1.008426030527669 eV/c^2?
If 1 eV/c^2 contains a structure with smaller units, then it would be like this:
1 eV/c^2 = Matter(59×31×31×3×3) × Antimatter(59×31) × asymmetry? It has masses like this 1/933322239 eV/c^2.
Hypothetical extraordinary correlation #1:
The particular mass of Down Quark and Up Quark could emerge while the structure of the Gluon field becomes geometrically symmetric when it decays into a Proton, making the strongly stable Proton.
Proton's hypothetical structure == 3481 × 31^2 × 31 × 9 × 1.005303472855531 eV/c^2.
Down Quark's hypothetical structure == 59 × 31^2 × 9 × 9 × 1.023381212332223 eV/c^2.
Hypothetical extraordinary correlation #2:
The mass of the Helium nucleus == 59×59×31×31×31×3×3×4×1.005996337712896 == 3755675017.36 eV/c^2
The asymmetry in the Helium nucleus = 1.005996337712896 - 1 == 0.0059963377128957
The mass of the final atomic symmetry == 1/0.0059963377128957 == 166.7684589961309 == Nearly, 167 amu.
Atom-65 Terbium's mass == 158.9254 amu, Melting point == 1629 K, Boiling point == 3396 K
Atom-66 Dysprosium's mass == 162.50 amu, Melting point == 1680 K, Boiling point == 2840 K
Atom-67 Holmium's mass == 164.9304 amu, Melting point == 1734 K, Boiling point == 2873 K
Atom-68 Erbium's mass == 167.26 amu, Melting point == 1802 K, Boiling point == 3141 K (It is stable at 167 amu)
Atom-69 Thulium's mass == 168.9342 amu, Melting point == 1818 K, Boiling point == 2223 K
Atom-70 Ytterbium's mass == 173.04 amu, Melting point == 1097 K, Boiling point == 1469 K
Probaby, most masses of quantum objects (standard elementary particles) have a relationship to each other because their masses have a strong relationship to a very few similar numbers. E.g., 59, 31, 3.
The W Boson’s mass == 59×59×31×31×31×31×(3 + 2)×(3 + 2)×1.000094376386809 == 80377000000 eV/c^2.
The Z Boson’s mass == 59×59×31×31×31×31×(3 + 1)×(3 + 4)×1.013040843642746 == 91187600000 eV/c^2.
The Neutron's mass == 59×59×31×31×31×3×3×1.00668920257026 == 939565420.52 eV/c^2.
The Proton's mass == 59×59×31×31×31×3×3×1.005303472855531 == 938272088.16 eV/c^2.
The mass of gluons without the fluctuations like quarks = 59×59×31×31×31×3×3×1 = 933322239 eV/c^2.?
Photons have many different masses, including very low-energy masses. The mass of a photon == 31×a/b eV/c^2.?
The Higgs Boson's mass == 59×59×59×31×31×3×3×3×(3+2)×(3+14)×1.000404952049279 == 125100000000
eV/c^2 or 59×31×31×31×31×3×3×3×(3+1)×(3+7) == 58846758120 eV/c^2 (The hypothetical mass of a matter or antimatter Higgs super-fermion that has an undetectable -1-x Charge or +1+x Charge while x>0.) or 59×59×59×31×31×3×3×2.34754606458332×30 == 125100000000 eV/c^2.?
Perhaps, the Higgs Boson decays into matter and antimatter Higgs super-fermions and a photon, before it decays into fermions. Presumably, more groups of elementary particles exist with relatively undetectable Charges.
Likely, there is a fundamental building block with 31 points of existence. Perhaps, they emerged from 32 or 33 fundamental structures like 31 points of existence with a lost point or lost points of existence due to a delayed breaking point (like Bhavanga Upaccheda) and interactions. Most likely, a structure with connected 31 or 32 points of existence can connect with another similar structure by sharing their points of existence with each other like this:
((32 or 31) + (-32 or -31) == 29+((1-1)+(1-1)+(1-1) or (1-1)+(1-1))-29 == 29+(x+y+z or y+z)-29. If x+y+z=3a or y+z=2a, and a=0, then 29+(3a or 2a)-29 == 29+(3x0 or 2x0)-29 == 59 points of existence with 3 or 2 potential gaps == 59×(built-in 3-3 or 2-2 symbolic gap) == 59(3/3 or 2/2 potentiality).
Arguably, 31 planes of existence could emerge if they depend on 31 types of possible connections between two connected fundamental streams of existence. If the three neutral gaps ((1-1)+(1-1)+(1-1)) between the connected two streams of existence became a reason to originate a plane of existence like the third plane of existence, then two neutral gaps between two connected streams of existence (61(built-in 2-2 symbolic gap)) could create the second plane of existence. Similarly, four neutral gaps between two connected streams of existence (57(built-in 4-4 symbolic gap)) could create the fourth plane of existence, and so on.
Stam Nicolis added an answer
Total mass is additive, not multiplicative, and antimatter has the same mass as matter. So a positron has the same mass as an electron and the mass of positronium, the bound state of an electron and a positron, is less than twice the mass of the electron (or the positron) due to the contribution of the binding energy.
The mass of composite particles, such as the proton and neutron, is more complicated to compute than the mass of ``elementary'' particles, such as the W boson or the Z boson. How to compute the mass of the W and the Z bosons, however, is known and it would be useful to study quantum field theory in general and the Standard Model in particular.
The numerology presented doesn’t mean anything, however.
Suresh Wanayalaege
Suresh Wanayalaege added an answer
Stam Nicolis, this multiplicative representation of the Proton's mass: Antimatter(59 × 31 × 31 × 3 × 3) × Matter(59 × 31) × 1.005303472855531 eV/c^2 is also similar to this additive representation of the Proton's mass: Antimtter(31 × 3 × 3) × Matter(1) × 59 × 31 × 1.005303472855531.
It means that the Proton's mass contain 59 × 31 × 1.005303472855531 pars of Antimatter(31 × 3 × 3) parts and Matter(1) parts. Therefore, the relationship between Matter and Antimatter in a quantum object is both additive and multiplicative. Also, the primary numers in the representation align with it and other masses of quantum objects from more than one decimal places.
The Electron can contain a hidden unit of Antimatter like this: Matter(59 × 31 × 31 × 3 × 3) × Antimatter(1) × 1.001387338009097 eV/C^2. It explains the nature of mass better than the concept of electric fields and magnetic fields. It shows that all the masses contain building blocks of both matter and antimatter.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
පටිච්චසමුප්පාදය සහ අවිද්‍යාව - Dependent Origination and Avijja

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sam Harris on Solving the Hard Problem of Consciousness: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v11PQuqhAxs

@smlanka4u:
No need anything to change nothingness. Time could change nothingness and make relationships between many points of nothingnesses. Thank you.

@kensey007:
Time is something.

@smlanka4u:
​ @kensey007, Time is continuation of nothingness.

@kensey007:
I'll just accept your definition of time for the sake of argument.  Back to your original claim now that you made this clarification:

"A continuation of nothingness  could change nothingness"

I'd love to see an example of that.

@smlanka4u:
 @kensey007, Quantum Entanglement is a connection between two entangled quantum objects, and those quantum objects don't feel the distance between them due to nothingness of the quantum objects between them. The directions of continuation of time (plus and minus dimensions) of each point of nothingness make geometrical relationships between points of nothingness from moment to moment while the points of nothingness continue to exist. Time becomes smallest moments due to relationships between points of nothingness and continuation of time. You can see how I have explained the relationships between the dimensions of points of nothingness mathematically. Points of nothingness could make dimensional relationships and structures while they continue to exist.

@5piles:
nothingness doesnt exist,  thats why its called nothing

@smlanka4u:
 @5piles, Nothingness is not possible to be stable with time, and it grows into things of many things of nothingness due to the flow of time.

@5piles:
 @smlanka4u  read again,  nothingness doesnt exist.  thats what the word means.

@smlanka4u:
 @5piles, Nothingness is not non-existence of time at any location of nothingness. Therefore, nothingness continues to exist at a location like a thing of time. Also, a lot of points of time can separately exist like babies of time. The growth of time must break nothingness into many parts of nothingness because nothingness is not an unchanging constant at a fixed location.

@5piles:
 @smlanka4u  nothing means nothing.  only existence exists.

@smlanka4u:
 @5piles, Nothingness exists at a location and time for a moment. No one can show a nothingness without using a location and time. Therefore, nothingness is a relative existence of a location and a moment. A lot of points of nothingness have locations of time like points of moments with +6 and -6 dimensions at each point.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
බුදුවරුන් දෙනමක් මුහුණට මුහුණ හමු වු විශ්මිත අවස්ථාව මෙන්න

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

සසරේ මුලක් තිබේද ? 🪔 | සංසාරයට ආරම්භයක් මුලක් තිබුනොත් කුමක් සිදුවේවිද?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0USV0fwu49o

@smlanka4u:
Time is the first cause that changed nothingness into many points of nothingness. The entire universe was a thing even if it was infinitely nothing, and nothingness continued with time. Therefore, the entire universe has a first cause. The formation of Citta (energy-process) could happen in many different ways, and a special formation of energy/Citta could have a potential to become clinging/Upadana during the start of that process. Therefore, a very small amount of Citta (energy-process) could make generations of Citta like living beings. Therefore, life is only a very unique formation of Citta in the ocean of Cittas in the universe. The continuation of some generations of Citta like rebirth/re-becoming (Samsara) could start with the first formation of the universe itself. The 12  links in the chain of dependent origination contain the reasons to have a rebirth/re-becoming (Upadana/Clinging, Bhava/Becoming, Jati/Generation, Jaramarana/Decay-death) itself, and it happens within a mind/Citta-moment (Chittakhana). Therefore, dependent origination could start a unique Citta with a potential to become a life from the first formation of matter and Citta an uncountable time ago even if it is experimentally unverifiable by anyone. Tipitaka doesn't mention assumptions and unobserved details about the process of energy and the universe. So, we can't say that Tipitaka rejects the idea of beginning of energy formation and parts of the universe.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REBIRTH, REINCARNATION, BUDDHISM & ADVAITA VEDANTA

@smlanka4u:
A quiet place helps to develop a consistent Samadhi/concentration. Also, only one emotion or a feeling can continue a consistent state of Samadhi. Sadhu Sadhu Sadhu.

@simeondawkins6358:
Its not needed what is is finding that inner silance stillness and staying in that so the Light of the mind grows so does the love peace and clarity etc

@smlanka4u:
 @simeondawkins6358, Right Sati (Mindfuness) meditation is the 7th step in the noble eightfold path. Right Samadhi (stillness/concentration) is the 8th (final) step. You are talking about the 7th step, but it is a very important step.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE FIVE AGGREGATES - I

Indians | Ep 5: Nalanda and the Decline of Buddhism | A Brief History of a Civilization

Dependent Origination (Pratītyasamutpāda) in Buddhism

@smlanka4u:
Matter emerges from energy like a quantum wave becomes a particle due to interactions. It is a collapse of the wave function. Dependent origination (pratītyasamutpadā/ paṭiccasmuppāda) is the Buddha’s teaching on causality and the process of life. The basic principle in it is "if this exists, that exists; if this ceases to exist, that also ceases to exist". We can put the 12 links in the chain of dependent origination into 3 moments (Khana) in a Chittakhana like this:
1st moment/Khana: i. Avijjā/Avidyā (nescience/asymmetry), ii. Saṅkhāra/Saṃskāra (energy/volitional formations)
2nd moment/Khana: iii. Viññāṇa/Vijñāna (separately knowing/taking), iv. Nāma-Rūpa (emotional-material actions), v. Saḷāyatana/Ṣaḍāyatana (six sense bases/sources), vi. Phassa/Sparśa (contact/touch), vii. Vedanā (feeling/sensation) viii. Taṇhā/Tṛṣṇā (connection/greed)
2nd and/or 3rd moment/Khana (the reasons for re-becoming/rebirth): ix. Upādāna (clinging/grasping), x. Bhava (becoming/continuation),
3rd moment/Khana: xi. Jāti (generation/regeneration), Xii. Jarāmaraṇa (decay-death/break). 
Thank you so much for the explanation. ❤❤❤

@InspiredJourneyWithin:
So beautifully  explained. I have saved your comment in my notebook which I refer to when creating the videos. Thanks once again. 🙏🙏🙏

@smlanka4u:
 @InspiredJourneyWithin, Glad to see your interest in it. But you already explained it very well. Thank you too. 🙏🙏🙏

@BuddhaDharmaAJourneyWithin:
🙏 I am discontinuing this channel. Thank you for your support. Currently, I am in the process of moving long videos to the new channel. I will be uploading long videos twice weekly on Saturdays and Wednesdays on new channel. The link to the new channel is www.youtube.com/@LuminousLifePath.

@smlanka4u:
 @BuddhaDharmaAJourneyWithin, Subscribed. Try some interviews, AMAs, and  discussions to break barriors of the YouTube algorithm. Best of luck.

@BuddhaDharmaAJourneyWithin:
🙏Thank you @smlanka4u . I have to put in many hours to create long videos. I had almost put my daily life on hold to create the long videos for last 6 months and I couldn't keep up with the daily uploads. Also, the channel had long and short videos and short video subscribers/viewers have different expectations than the long video viewers. This is ancient Buddha knowledge available to all of us, I just package it and present it to the world. But I have to study and understand it myself first before I create any videos. The AI tools that I use for media/audio are expensive. Hence I thought it is better to restart from scratch that I can sustain long term. So decided on letting go of 550is hours of watch time and begin fresh. This is divine knowledge and it will find whoever needs to hear it. I feel my purpose is to make it available so that spiritual seekers become more curious and explore the world of knowledge already available on internet. Thank you for your support @smlanka4u. I will be uploading same long videos in the other channel so you might find them repetitive. I will be creating new long videos too but not so frequently as I have to upload the videos that were available on this channel first.

@smlanka4u:
 @BuddhaDharmaAJourneyWithin, Views depend on many reasons, and the quality of a content is only a small reason. Sometimes, negative words like insults bring more views due to some unthical algorithms of social media. So, don't worry about your ability depending on views. Also, I think it is better if you use your own video recordings to make contents to prevent giving reasons to them to reduce views manually. However, you can use your good intentions and creativity to help people understand the importance of spiritul developments. If people know why they need spirituality, then they start exploring spirituality. Also, systematic knowledge is helpful to develop confidence in the path.

@BuddhaDharmaAJourneyWithin:
Thank you @smlanka4u  🙏. The AI tools that I have been using for video and audio are very expensive. I was hoping that the channel can sustain its own expense. I am not able to afford daily uploads. Also I wanted to separate long and short videos as the viewers of both formats have different expectations. It is not that I want to make money from this channel. This is divine knowledge and available to everyone.  My main purpose of creating these videos is to increase the curiosity amongst viewers to explore more as I cannot cover extensive details in 10 to 15 minutes videos. I, myself, am on spiritual journey. While creating these videos, I go through resources and listen to the video couple of times before publishing and that helps me so much to better understand 'the knowledge'. I am currently in the Himalayas so don't have much resources to create my own video recordings but I wish I could do so. Creating own video recordings is the best solution for me. "If people know why they need spirituality, then they start exploring spirituality."....this is so true...only if people knew! Thank you 🙏

@smlanka4u:
 @BuddhaDharmaAJourneyWithin , Ok. I can understand. Just try to make things happen better without worrying about the result. We have a lot to learn from reliable resources because we are just normal people with a few abilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Right Intention in Buddhism: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/9LPfKlj8X7A

@smlanka4u:
Try some trending topics from latests events to increase views. A lot of people need to know latest events.

@LuminousLifePath:
Thank you @smlanka4u. It is a good suggestion. I will follow up on this. It is the YouTube algorithm which is acting weird. The videos in my other channel were reaching viewers in so many countries but then suddenly it stopped reaching people around mid December last year. But I have kind of given up on worrying about the results. I am going to create these videos on Dharma as I feel it is my life's purpose. Some viewers like yourself are with me since the beginning of this channel as well as the previous channel and it motivates me. Also creating these videos help me gain deeper understanding of dharma.

@smlanka4u:
 @LuminousLifePath, Yes. Don't be afraid to use desire (Chanda) to make things happen because desire (Chanda) is not bad if it is not associated with attachment (Raga). Enlightened people used Chanda (unattached-desire), Viriya (effort), Citta (the mind), and Vimansa (investigation) to make things happen like miracles. 

@LuminousLifePath:
What you said is so beautiful @smlanka4u. Thank you. I will explore a bit more on Chanda.

@smlanka4u:
 @LuminousLifePath, Chanda (choice/desire) is a mental power mentioned in Satara Iddhipada (four spiritual-powers).

@LuminousLifePath:
Thank you @smlanka4u  for introducing me to Satara Iddhipada. This is new to me. I am studying it from the resources on internet.

@smlanka4u:
 @LuminousLifePath, Thank you too. 🙏
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[MN 28] Four Noble Truths, Elements & Dependent Origination: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RZE2XDKgxZc

@smlanka4u:
The four great elements originate together with another set of them, and that smallest unit is the Pure-Eight material unit called Suddattaka in Pali. Those smallest elements make the unit of 24 derived matter zone called Rupa-Kalapa. The quantum objects called Rupa Sarira (matter-body) and Rupa Santhana (matter-collection/atom) emerges from them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why Consciousness is Immortal | The Philosophical Proof of Life After Death

41. Different types of Kalāpas

@smlanka4u:
If 1 Avinibboga (1 inseparable) is 1 Kalapa, then an Ashtaka (eight) Kalapa contains 8 connected Avinibboga Kalapas. If those eight Kalapas exist one after another with 17 Citta-moments for each (17x8), then it contains 136 Citta-moments. 137 or 1/137 are unexplained numbers in quantum mechanics, and the number 1/137 is called the fine-structure constant. Therefore, the number 136 is like a fundamental constant. If so, a Navaka Kalapa contains 9 smallest Avinibboga Kalapas. It is like an increase of the wavelength of a quantum object. 🙏
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chinese Buddhism

@smlanka4u:
The 4th Buddhist council held in Kashmir made or developed Mahayana Buddhism, and divided Buddhism into two major sects. Similarly, the land of Kashmir is divided into two parts between two religiously different countries on some reasons. Sometimes, Karma/reaction works in mysterious ways. The original 4th Buddhist council was held in Sri Lanka. Thank you for revealing the truth. ❤
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Do Schrödinger's equations include the principle of least action?
Do Schrödinger's equations include the principle of least action?
Any time-dependent physical process must conform to the principle of least action which is a universal law.
We assume that the Schrödinger PDE SE solution in its current form does not automatically follow the principle of least action, but some mathematicians and physicists argue that it should if the terms of the SE and PLA concepts are extended or modified.

Suresh Wanayalaege
 added an answer
No. The Schrodinger's wave function is just a mathematical representation of the probabilistic potential of appearing an electron at a location or time. But the Schrodinger's wave equation doesn't use time correctly, and it doesn't explain the nature of a quantum wave because it depends on experimental measurements and assumptions. Also, it hypothetically describes only the potential locations and probability of collapsing the electron's structure within the left and right range of its width.

Ismail Abbas added an answer
For interested contributors:
Please take a look at,
Cairo Technics Solution of Schrödinger's Partial Differential Equation - Time Dependence, Researchgate, IJISRT Journal, March 24.
We assume there is a detailed answer.
Suresh Wanayalaege added an answer
Ismail Abbas, The output energy of an interaction depends on the location of it in the structure/wave of a quantum object. Detector/Observer damages a location in quantum object, causing to start collapsing the processes in them from that location as if appearning a quantum particle. But, the energy produced during the collapse of the structures/waves is just a reconstruction of the quantum structures/waves from the location of their damage. Quantum objects don't contain quantum particles in its structures/waves. Also, the amount of energy produced at the location doesn't represent an existence of a quantum particle at that location. Therefore, the principle of least action is not applicable to the collapse of the wave function, and the probability of appearing a quantum point particle from a quantum structure/wave in Schrodinger's wave equation is just a hypothetical description of appearing energy.
Learn more about matter and energy:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Instant Relaxation: 5-Minute Guided Breathwork for Nervous System Regulation

@smlanka4u:
Breathing meditation is like an observation of feelings (Vedananupassana), and observing the feelings in the body while breathing in and out makes it a both mindfulness (Vipassana) and relaxing/tranquizing (Samatha) meditation. But the consistent state of concentration called Samadhi is like automatic concentrations on a single object. Feelings are the main objects of the breathing meditation. The mind becomes less attached to stressful feelings when it focuses and changes its attention like this: "Breathe in naturally and feel the feelings from nose to the entire body like allowing the mind to feel all the feelings at once. And then, breathe out naturally and feel the feelings at nose. Also, think that feelings are not mine." It helps the mind to take the control of feelings, and reduces painful feelings of addictions and stress. It is very helpful to develop concentration (Samadhi), and prepare the mind for a good rebirth and enlightenment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Experimental Physicist Explains String Theory


@smlanka4u:
Many worlds exist from instant to instant, and space contains hidden worlds. It is a mathematically provable hypothesis, and I developed a theory to prove it.

@kahlrhoam6769:
 @smlanka4u ; I’d like to see proof of that.
It’d be the 1st time I ever saw something like that get PROVEN.

@smlanka4u:
 @kahlrhoam6769, It explains the building blocks of mass in quantum objects. I have provided a path for the document in the description.

@kahlrhoam6769:
 @smlanka4u ; Ok, thx.
I wish you well. 🖖✨
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monk Chat: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=36kFPJHDH78

@smlanka4u:
Utmost pleasure is cessation/healing of addictions/Asava/Vana/greed/Tanha (Nibbana Paramam Sukham). 🙏
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Divine Interpretation of Quantum Theory

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bridging Science, Philosophy and Religion with Bernard Carr, Bernardo Kastrup and Lelung Rinpoche: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCpsrCV1h1M

@smlanka4u:
Idealism is not a Theravada Buddhist fundamental. The creator of separation is Citta, and it exists everywhere. Thank you.

@truthlivingetc88:
Does your opinion/evidence come from a Buddhist text ? Experience ? Both ? Something else ?

@smlanka4u:
 @truthlivingetc88, Texts, logic, and maths. Matter makes matter while hosting the stream of creation called Citta-Vithi. Everything is just Citta-Vithi.

@joeldeadastronaut:
The first half of your statement contradicts the second half.
Saying that everything is citta-vrtti (thought forms) is an explicitly idealist statement.
Saying that matter hosts citta-vrtti is a materialist statement.
They contradict each other.

@smlanka4u:
 @joeldeadastronaut, No. All the Citta-Vithis are just processes in matter, and some Citta-Vithis continue like living processes due to some unique root causes. 

@philosophybabble:
Mahayana Buddhism differs significantly from Theravada Buddhism. It's important to grasp the distinctions between the two.

@smlanka4u:
 @philosophybabble, yes. Exactly.

@philosophybabble:
 @smlanka4u  However, it's important to note that while these elements of Mahayana Buddhism can be compared to philosophical idealism, Buddhist teachings are complex and multifaceted. They often transcend simple categorizations found in Western philosophy.

@yoya4766:
 @philosophybabble  Unfortunately hard to access these teachings. Not from the lama's who are in the west. Language barriers also a reason.

@smlanka4u:
 @philosophybabble, Presumably, speed is the essence of everything. If so, idealism is just an output of speeds like awareness of speeds. Material qualities/actions could emerge from interactions of speeds. The flow of time could make speeds, and the speed of speed could continue existence like the most fundamental process of everything. Also, a material quality is just a quality without any constant material essence/substance.

@philosophybabble:
​ @smlanka4u  Eternalism's view of time complements the idea that the universe's existence is a constant flow of changes in speed, with past, present, and future being inseparable parts of a continuous whole. 
Comparing this to Mahayana Buddhism, we find intriguing parallels.This can align with the idea that material qualities emerge from the interplay of speeds, without any fundamental essence.

@smlanka4u:
 @philosophybabble, As I have heard, the past exists or accessible like a straight line. Also, the past structures have a potential to impact present structures due to some ways of dependents in 24 ways of dependents called Suvisi Pratyaya. And newly originated smallest meterial structures (new Rupa-Kalapa) are smaller than the previously existed structures. Presumably, new structures appear between the existed structures like sending the existing structures to the past while originating relatively smaller structures. Some structures of the past would survive like long distant quantum entanglements with a less abilily to interact with new structures. If so, energy conservation is not the only method of surviving the information of past, and existing energy would become information of past while originating new energy. Asymmetry of speeds could become energy like the formation of energy/speeds called Sanskara before emerging the awareness called Vinnana. Awareness emerges from Sanskara. Therefore, idealism is not the beginning. Future doesn't exist, but sometimes future is predictable. Theravada fundamentals and explanations are highly interconnected to each other in highly systematic and derivable ways.

@philosophybabble:
 @smlanka4u  This reflects a worldview in which time and existence are seen as deeply conditional, marked by a pervasive interdependence that defies simple categorization.

@smlanka4u:
 @philosophybabble, It is a very deep and mysterious topic, and we can't easily find modern commentaries on it. Also, it is not a popular topic. Usually, modern teachers are afraid to make their comments on mysterious topics like that. Therefore, a lot of people don't even know the existence of explanations on some deep processes like that.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Einstein's general theory of relativity has been described as the greatest scientific triumph in history, a geometric theory of gravitation relating local spacetime curvature with the local energy, momentum and stress within that spacetime:
Rᵤᵥ - ½gᵤᵥR = 8πG/c⁴•Tᵤᵥ
Where;
Rᵤᵥ - ½gᵤᵥR - Describes the curvature of spacetime.
8πG/c⁴•Tᵤᵥ - Describes the matter and energy in spacetime.
Suresh Ran Rahas
Believing science is not useful sometimes. Prof. Albert Einstein introduced energy in Kilograms. But in reality, energy doesn't have a mass, and only a mass produces energy. Also, light contains mass because momentum contains mass. According to my theory, Prof. Albert Einstein was wrong, but a lot of people believe him.
  • Like
  • Reply
Baji Surti
Suresh Ran Rahas So how come you haven't won the Nobel yet, yo genius?
  • Like
  • Reply
Suresh Ran Rahas
Baji Surti, The research paper is a preprint, and I'm not affiliated to any university. But it is available to read online on researchgate website.
  • Like
  • Reply
Baji Surti
Suresh Ran Rahas Has your "research paper" been peer reviewed? If so, what do your peers have to say? How many people have agreed with your postulate? A man who claims Einstein was wrong, and can prove it, would be world famous already. Nobody's heard of you, and there are lots of quacks who claim all kinds of things and even write all kinds of things. By the way, light is carried by photons and photons have NO mass. Even I know that without having a PhD in Physics. AND, even an elementary text book will tell you that Momentum is the product of Mass and Velocity, so by this definition massless photons and hence light CANNOT have momentum! Go take your quackery elsewhere.
Suresh Ran Rahas
Baji Surti, You confirmed the contradiction saying that photons cannot have momentum. According to quantum mechanics, photon's energy (E) = momentum (p) x the speed of light (c). Photons have momentum according to quantum theories. And photons have mass according to QED. If you can't accept it, then you are not honest. Also, don't forget that a lot of people didn't even understand Einstein's general relativity. But his theory was accepted after experimental observations.
  • Like
  • Reply
Baji Surti
Suresh Ran Rahas You're quibbling. Photons (along with gluons and gravitons) have NO mass. That much is universally accepted. Momentum MUST have Mass x Velocity. If a Photon does not have Mass, it cannot by definition have Momentum. It's that simple. The photon's Energy equation (E=MC2) states M for MASS, not Momentum. Mass and Momentum are NOT the same thing and are NOT interchangeable. The formula for calculating a photon's energy is E=ℎf and not E-MC2. Here is a quote from Scientific Research ... "E=hc/r=2πrcmc/r=2πrmc2. Maxwellian electromagnetism and QED are based on the hypothesis that the photon should be a particle with a rest mass of zero, and it is generally agreed that photons have no mass." You're being devious and untruthful. And yes, Einstein's theory was accepted AFTER experimental observations that PROVED him right. And even today experiments prove him right. That's how science works. Your bogus theory is based on what observations and experiments, and when were they carried out and confirmed? You're a dilettante and you're completely ignorant about physics, but you have a strange vainglorious idea about your ability. And you're a poseur. Tell us again which peer reviewed papers you've published, and which scientists have accepted your assertion. If not, shut up and stop fabricating fantasies. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing, particularly in the hands of poseurs like you.
  • Like
  • Reply
  • Edited
Suresh Ran Rahas
Baji Surti, Massless photon hypothesis in QED doesn't prove that protons are massless, and it is a wrong interpretation because photon is not just a force. Proton's high mass doesn't come from its quarks. The gluon field in proton is responsible for the main mass in proton. E=hf is an equation in quantum mechanics. E = mc^2 is not compatible with proton's energy if photon is massless. Therefore, theorists try to use E = pc equation to justify the masslessness of photon saying that momentum is massless. It is not a my opinion. Also, some theoriests say that photons have mass in QED. It is also not a my opinion. If you can't use your brain to understand it, then it is not a my problem. Modern science is based on lot of lies, and I'm not yet sure that they will stop believing their lies (scientism) easily. So, I'm just sharing my theories in many ways first to see responses while developing more theories. And I know that I have to deal with very big egos because a lot of highly educated university people have a lot of greed, anger, and delusion even if some of them are like parrots. Some people can't understand somethings until a lot of people accept those things. It is like following trends of others. Also, some people want to know things in detail to understand those things. Therefore, it is not easy to popularize something new against the current trend. Modern science use wrong interpretations and hypothetical principles to ignore unexplainable things. But good theories can explain experimental results better. Some creationists would not like to accept the theory of everything if it damages their beliefs. We can't make everyone happy. And don't try to control others to maintain your ego. You have a lot of things to learn.
  • Like
  • Reply

Baji Surti
Suresh Ran Rahas Oh wow, so according to you modern science is mostly based on lies and YOU are the genius who has uncovered them. Surprisingly, nobody at all has heard of you and you're just a nick on Facebook and that's all you are. Speaking of "learning" things, when and where did you gain your Master's or PhD in Physics? Or are you just a natural extra-educational genius? And again, not surprisingly, from being an "expert" in Physics you're also now an expert in Psychology based on your comment about my ego. Where did you gain this knowledge from? The University of Armchair Psychology? You're an unrepentant poseur and an eediot, and you have a lot of physics to learn. Now I'm going to put you on iggy because you're unrepentantly tedious. By the way, have you noticed how you have (either deviously or stupidly) used Proton and Photon and Mass and Momentum interchangeably? You truly are an eediot, and you're very confused. Go away.
  • Like
  • Reply
  • Edited
Suresh Ran Rahas
Baji Surti, You can't use E = mc^2 to say that photons or protons are massless because E = mc^2 equation contain mass with energy even if some theorists try to say that Photons and gluon field in protons are just energies. Let me know if you have a PHD because it will be a good confirmation for me that PHDs can damage people's brain. You don't like to accept my answers because of your ego even if you don't know right answers. You don't like to accept that you don't have answers, and you try to hide your ignorence, saying useless things. And don't try to hide truth to protect your faith. I don't want your opinions because I know how science works. You have a lot of things to unlearn and learn to reduce your ego. Don't think that modern science is the only science in this world. I don't need to learn a lot from modern science to know the truth. If you are a believer, then you can try to keep looking at the sky to find your creator god without trying to understand who you are. But don't think that science has proved that a creator God or someone else can save your from the process of nature. Your mind use a brain, but don't think that your mind has a brain. You can't learn real science from modern science to understand the process of the mind. I could verify my theories from reliable sourses. Therefore, I know what I'm talking. But I know that your blind faith and ego don't allow you to investigate unknown things from other resourses even if you don't have good answers. Don't waste my time. You don't need to reply if you don't want to reply.
Baji Surti
Suresh Ran Rahas YOU were the one that used that equation to explain the photon, YOU MOROWN! Tell me where you got your degree (any degree) in Physics from, you stoopid dilettante.
  • Like
  • Reply
Baji Surti
Suresh Ran Rahas I'm done with your stoopid pretentious poseur ass. Go play in my iggy bin.
  • Like
  • Reply
Suresh Ran Rahas
Baji Surti, You were trying to justify Einstein's theories. Einstein can't use E = mc^2 equation to say that photon's are massless. I can understand your mental state. Please don't waste my time. Bye.
  • Like
  • Reply

Suresh Ran Rahas
Einstein's energy equation (E=mc'2) is not applicable to photons (light) if photons are massless. Also, the speed of light depends on the density of the medium, but Einstein didn't mention it in his equation. If we fix that problem in his energy equation, then it shows that energy doesn't become mass because energy depends on mass.
  • Like
  • Reply
  • Edited
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lee Smolin: Why Should We Quantize Gravity?:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paS4LYrXjr0

@smlanka4u:
Gravity is a force, and general relativity doesn't explain it.

@surendranmk5306:
 @smlanka4u  when a planet revolving around a star, space is curved instead of straight, appears as curvature of space. But in free  fall, falling path could be a straight line and kinetic energy is increasing so that it look like a force. A metal spring is not a foce. When pushed or pulled energy is stored and act as a force.

@smlanka4u:
 @surendranmk5306, Space doesn't bend because space is not like a rubber sheet. Gravitational force increases the density of hidden matter in space, and causes space waves called gravitational waves.

@surendranmk5306:
 @smlanka4u  That was Einstein, never I'm, who put forward the idea of space time curvature and it is mathematically true. How ever it is ridiculous to think about hidden matter with gravitation. First of all you have to find the physical nature of electric charge.

@smlanka4u:
 @surendranmk5306, We belong to only one part from the spectrum of electric charges. Electric charge depends on observable protons. Hidden (dark matter) protons would have different electric charges.

@surendranmk5306:
 @smlanka4u with particles electric charges don't have any spectrum. Simplest elementary charge is + - electron positron charge and it is constant any where in the universe. All we see as electric charge is that and it's  multiples according to the count of particles. Charge with proton is charge of positron as all other particle's charge is cancelled by opposite one's.

@smlanka4u:
 @surendranmk5306, If Dark Matter atoms exist, then their nucleuses would produce Dark/hidden charges, causing it to produce Dark/hidden electric charges. As I know from some analysis, protons are the main cause of electric charge and proton's charge. Some hidden/dark quantum fields would make massive quantum objects with relatively different charges. It is a hypothesis.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Echoes of Enlightenment – Bihar’s Timeless Tie to Buddha

@smlanka4u:
A reminding/mindfulness (Smruthi/Sati) meditation: "Materials are not mine. Feelings are not mine. Perceptions/Ideas are not mine. Emotions are not mine. Consciousnesses are not mine."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Effort and Non Effort in Buddhist Practice

@naywin7097:
Not " ordinary effort" but " Right effort" is the key to open the door of enlightenment. The problem is effort on what and what kind of effort is " Right" . The missing link between " principal" and " practice" of Buddhism. How to combine and corelate with Four Noble Truth and Four foundations of Mindfulness is essential.

@smlanka4u:
The effort (Viriya) to gain ownership comes from views (Ditti) and sensual desires (Kamacchanda) with a pain until we remove the craving to gain ownership of something from our minds. The removal of ownerships from the mind with the help of the four noble truths is the right view.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How We're Redefining the kg

Does Space Emerge From A Holographic Boundary?

Materialism

How Can MASS and ENERGY be the Same Thing? What, Where and Why is it?

HOW to DO NOTHING & ACHIEVE SOMETHING

@smlanka4u:
Habitual attachments/addictions reduce when we are prepared to stop giving good (Subha) identifications (Nimithi) to imaginary (conceptual/unreal) material qualities like beautifulness/colours, rareness, movingness, and sadness etc. 🙏Sadhu🙏Sadhu🙏Sadhu

@englishmonk:
Sukhi Hontu

@smlanka4u:
​ @englishmonk, We should behave as if we don't have the six senses to be enlightened according to Nagasena Arhat-Thera.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The “Worst Prediction” Was Never Made: The True Story

Bhante Punnaji explains the meaning of Āsava (*sanskrit: Āśrava)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gravity is not a force. But what does that mean?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3LjJeeae68

@smlanka4u:

Real science must explain the truth even if it is untestable.

@voltydequa845:
 @smlanka4u   «Real science must explain the truth even if it is untestable.»
----
It is not "real science", but "speculative science". The "truth" as a food for parrots. The models (representations) of reality are infinite, and are not equivalent to what they represent.

@smlanka4u:
 @voltydequa845, The truths that were discovered and verified don't change with time even if all the discoverers died.

@voltydequa845:
 @smlanka4u  «The truths that were discovered and verified don't change with time even if all the discoverers died.»
----
This one of yours does not make sense. There are no "truths", since "discovery" is not a synonym for "truth", and since "discoveries", along with "verification",  are (re)interpreted along the spirit of times. "Discoveries" do not "die". You'd better go with metaphysic truths and discoveries.

@smlanka4u:
 @voltydequa845, You can believe your interpretation of truths if you want. The great discoverers like supreme Buddha and his great disciples discovered great truths. Check your senses if you can't understand it.



No comments:

Post a Comment

We highly admire your helpful comments on our posts.