Imagine the start of the Universe. The Universe didn't have a distance to any direction. But the most important thing is that we don't need a distance to show directions, because the 6 directions doesn't require any existence. We usually show directions with a distance like this (If distance from my school to my house = 1Km, then Distance = 1Km and Direction = my school to my house direction): 1km-0km = 1km. But we can show the 6 directions like this too: +0-0 left, +0-0 right, +0-0 up, +0-0 down, +0-0 front, +0-0 back. So we can calculate the thinkness of the Universe like this: (+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0) = (+0-0)6
I think we can explain the birth of Matter and Antimatter mathematically.
We can write gaps of 3 directions like this to calculate a solid object: (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0)
And we can write the gaps of all the 6 directions like 2 objects like this: (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0)
If you calculte those 6 virtual gaps in the Universe mathematically then you will see how the Universe make +1 distance and and -1 distance with +0.0 and -0.0.
I just show the distance like this: +0-0 because it can show a direction without using a distance. I have mentioned a gap between +0 and -0, but that gap doesn't really exist, because there no distance between it. All the 6 directions can have that +0 and -0 gaps without gaps in beginning, which just represents a direction only. But we can use those gaps to calculate 2 solid objects with three dimensions. A gap between left and right direction (+0-0) and the gap between up and down direction (+0-0) and the gap between front and back direction can make an object (like a cube). So same like that the Universe can make two objects (Matter and Antimatter) using the 6 gaps of the 6 directions, but we can calculate it mathematically to find whether it can make a distance inside those objects or not. And those two objects should be the first two solid objects in the Universe. We can calculate it same like we calculate a solid cube. But because we converted 0 into +0-0 to show directions, we can't use 0 to calculate it, so those 2 objects can have a different shape (rounded shape).
(+0-0)3 x (+0-0)3 = Matter x Antimatter
(+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3
(+1-(-1))3 =
(+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1)
- ((+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3)
The birth of 3 dimensions:
i. (+1)3
ii. (-1)2 x (+1)
iii. ((+1)2 x (-1)
iv. (-1)3
The birth of 4 dimensions:
i. (+1)3 x (-1)
ii. ((-1)2 x (+1)2)
iii. ((+1)2 x (-1)2
iv. ((-1)3 x (+1))
(+1-(-1))3 made those 8 dimensional forms of space with a nature of Matter and Antimatter which can cause to convert those 8 dimensional forms of space into 16 quantum dimensional forms of space like Quarks, forces and etc.
According to Buddhism there are 8 quantum forms (smallest forms in empty space) called 'Shuddhastaka' (I guess, Shuddha = Pure, Astaka = Eight. So Shuddhastaka = Pure Eight) which made Atoms and etc. So it is also sounds like as same as those 8 dimensional forms of space I mentioned above. 8 Quantum Dimensional Forms Of Empty Space = Four 3D Forms + Four 4D Forms.
The Universe doesn't require a creator God. Humans created the concept of God. Everything in the Universe Is Made of Mathematics, but we just see it as a physical phenomenon. The speed of light and other constants of the Universe are just few final results which came from that mathematical calculations of the Universe. The source of Physics is pure mathematical. Real Mathematics are the creator of the Universe, and it is continuing the cyclic process of the Universe. Eg: "You can show me a Apple (1 Apple), but you don't know how to show me a minus Apple (-1 Apple) mathematically." Real mathematics are based on Directions and Dimensions. There are 6 directions, which can create upto 6 dimensions, but we are just using 4 dimensions inside 3 dimensions. 3 Dimensions are just space, and the 4th dimension becomes the time, but if there is a mathematical posibility to exist 3 Dimensions for space and 2 dimensions for time (Total 5 dimensions realm) then there will be many other types of living beings (heavenly beings). And if there is a mathematical posibility to exist 3 Dimensions for space and 3 dimensions for time (Total 6 dimensions realm) then there will be many other types of living beings (brahma beings). And if there were a mathematical posibility to exist only 3 dimensions (without a dimension for time) in the Universe then the life could not exist. And if there is a Apple (1 Apple) in that Universe then it must create a minus Apple (-1 Apple) in the opposite 3 dimensions of the Universe (Anti Universe) in order to balance the 6 dimensions which is based on the 6 directions of the Universe. But the Mathematics of the Universe just created 4 dimensions inside 3 dimensions, so we can't expect to form a minus Apple (-1 Apple) in any other dimension of the Universe, because it requires minimum extra 3 more dimensions, but our Universe already used 4 dimensions inside 3 dimensions, so there are only 2 more unknown dimensions left from the 6 main dimensions of the Universe.
- W. Suresh Madusanka
https://www.facebook.com/groups/1400789390242855/2656099958045119/
To remove quantum infinity (∞) from subatomic calculations in Quantum Physics in order to make it possible to do those calculations practically is interesting. Scientists replace quantum infinity (∞) in subatomic calculations using the 'Charge'and 'Mass' of quantum particles. I think the 'Charge' and 'Mass' is coming from few types of +1-1 dimensional formations inside atoms and etc. And if we write it like this -1, 0, +1 then we can see a gap between -1 and +1 which is equal to -+2 (-+2 is not equal to -2 or +2 because there is a zero (0) between -1 and +1). And if we write it like this 0, -1, +1 then we can see gaps with a negative/minus (-) force. The Gap between 0 and -1 is at the positive/plus (+) direction. So it shoud be equal to +1 with a -1 force ('Charge') which we can write like this '(Charge-(+1))'. So we should write this 0,-1,+1 correctly like this 0,(Charge-(+1)),+1 to write the gap between 0 and +1 with the extra gap ('(Charge-(+1))= Charge - (+1 gap)') which is equal to +2 at the positive/plus (+) direction (Dimensional Mathematics of the Universe start both -1 and +1 from 0 to the positive/plus (+) direction making a +2 Gap (Mass) with a -Force (Charge) from 0, -1, +1 interactions).
According to the Standard Model in particle physics, there are six different types of leptons. These include the Electron, the Muon, and Tau particles, as well as their associated neutrinos (i.e. electron neutrino, muon neutrino, and tau neutrino).
Lepton Type | Mass (Mev):
Electron | 0.511
Muon | 106
Tau | 1777
I can see a mathematical connection between the Mass off Electron, Muon and Tau.
If we round the Mass of those leptons, we can write it like this too:
Lepton Type | Mass (Mev):
Tau | (0.5+0.5) x 2000 = 2000 (around 1777)
Muon | 0.5 x 200 = 100 (around 106)
Electron | 0.5 (around 0.511)
So, if we use those numbers for the Mass of those leptons (Mass (Mev) Around: 2000 = Tau | 100 = Muon | 0.5 = Electron), then we can guess that mathematical connection like this:
Tau : Muon : Electron = 2000 : 100 : 0.5 = 4000 : 200 : 1
Mass of the Muon = (Mass of the Tau)/20
Mass of the Electron = (Mass of the Muon)/200
If the mathematical connection = 20:200, then the next posibility is 200:2000.
And there is another mathematical connection. If there are both +1 and -1, then -Tau : -Muon : -Electron = -4000 : -200 : -1, or we can try to convert it like this:
-Electron : -Muon : -Tau = 0.1/100 : 0.2/10000 : 0.4/100000 (*I just tried to put -1 (antimatter) into 0.0 as 0.1 (or 0.099))
So we can use those mathematical connections to guess an existence of another lepton ('X' Lepton) like this:
Mass of the 'X' Lepton = (Mass of the Electron)/2000
So, the Mass (Mev) of the 'X' Lepton = 0.5/2000 = 0.00025
Because the Mass (Mev) of the 'X' Lepton 0.00025 is less than 0.1 we should apply few more mathematics to bring it to the side of the -1.
If -Electron : -Muon : -Tau = 0.1/100 : 0.2/1000 : 0.4/1000 then, in order to make the 'X' Lepton an antimatter lepton we should divide it from 100.
Then,
The Mass (Mev) of the 'X' Lepton = 0.00025/100 = 0.0000025
According to my mathematical calculations the Mass of the 'X' Lepton 0.0000025 (Mev) is nearly equal to the mass of the Electron Neutrino which is equal to around 0.000003 (Mev).
If the Mass of the 'Y' Lepton = (Mass of the Muon)/(Mass of the Electron)
So, the Mass (Mev) of the 'Y' Lepton = 100/0.5 = 200
Because the 'X' Lepton (Antimatter Lepton) is at the opposite direction (-1 or 0.1 (0.099)) there is a possibility to create more leptons to that directoin to balance the formation of leptons. And we should apply some mathematics (antimatter mathematics) to bring it to the side of the -1 or 0.1.
If -Electron : -Muon : -Tau = 0.1/100 : 0.2/1000 : 0.4/1000 then, in order to make the 'Y' Lepton an antimatter lepton we should divide it from 1000.
Then,
The Mass (Mev) of the 'Y' Lepton = 200/1000 = 0.2
According to my mathematical calculations the Mass of the 'Y' Lepton 0.2 (Mev) is nearly equal to the mass of the Muon Neutrino which is equal to around 0.19 (Mev).
According to my mathematical calculations the Universe can make two objects (Matter and Antimatter) using the 6 gaps of the 6 directions:
(+0-0)3 x (+0-0)3 = Matter x Antimatter
According to this mathematical formula (a+b)2=a2+2ab+b2 we can write (+0-0)2 as 02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0 x 0 + 02
(+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3
(+1-(-1))3 can make 8 dimensional forms of space with a nature of Matter and Antimatter which can cause to convert those 8 dimensional forms of space into 16 quantum dimensional forms of space like Quarks, forces and etc.
බුදු දහමට අනුව පරමාණු වැනි කුඩා අංශු සෑදී තිබෙන්නෙ 'ශුද්ධාෂ්ටක' (ශුද්ධ අට) ලෙස හඳුන්වන ඉතා කුඩා මූලික දාතු 8කින්. ශුද්ධාෂ්ටක වල සතර මහා බූතයන් ලෙස ඝන, ද්රව, තාපය සහ වායු හඳුන්වනු ලබනවා. එහිදී බූත යන වචනය භාවිතා කර තිබෙන්නෙ එම දාතු වල නොපෙනෙන ස්වභාවයක් තිබෙන නිසයි. අනිත් ශුද්ධාෂ්ටක 4 තමයි සතර මාහා බූතයන්ගේ චරිත ලක්ෂණ හෙවත් 'ගති' ඇති දාතු. ඒවා සතර ඝන ගතිය , ද්රව ගතිය, තාපය ගතිය සහ වායු ගතිය ලෙස හඳුන්වනු ලබනවා. පහත විස්තර වලින් සඳහන් වෙන්නේ මා විසින් ඉදිරිපත් කර ඇති ගණිත ක්රම වලට අනුව දිශා වලින් සකස්වුණු මාන වල බැඳීම් 8ක්. ඒ සකස් වීම් 8 තුලත් ශුද්ධාෂ්ටක ලෙසම කරුණු සතර බැගින් කොටස් දෙකක් තියනවා. මා විසින් සොයාගත් මෙම සමිකරණයේ (+0-0)6 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 පළමු කොටස වන (+1-(-1))3 මගින් ගණිතමය මාන වල බැඳීම් 8ක් සෑදෙන අතර ඒ සමිකරණයේ දෙවැනි කොටස (+0.0-0.0)3 මගින් මෙම කොටස් තුන (+1-(-1)) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) සෑදෙන බැවින් පළමු කොටස දෙවන කොටසින් ගුණ (x) වීමේදී තුන් ගුණයක්ව ඇති පළමු කොටස (+1-(-1))3 ආසන්න වශයෙන් හතර ගුණයක් බවට පත්වීම නිසා (+1-(-1))4 මුලින් සකස් වූ 8 දෙගුණ වී 16ක් බවට පත්වෙන අතර දෙවන කොටසේ ඉතිරි වන මෙහි ඇති (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) කොටස් දෙක අසමතුලිත වන බැවින් ඒවා වලින් සරල ක්රමයකට මෙවැනි (+1-(-1)) ප්රතිඵලයක් නොලැබෙන බැවින් එම කොටස් දෙක තනි දෙයක් ලෙස සලකන්න පුළුවන්. නවීන විද්යාවට අනුව සොයාගෙන තිබෙන පරමාණු තුළ සහ හිස් අවකාශය තුලද තිබෙන කොටස් 17න් කොටස් 6ක් quarks ලෙසද, කොටස් 3ක් electrons ලෙසද කොටස් තුනක් neutrinos ලෙසද, කොටස් 4ක් basic forces ලෙසද හඳුන්වනු ලබනවා. ඊට අමතරව තනිව ඇති තවත් කොටසක් Higgs boson ලෙස හඳුන්වනවා. මාගේ ගණිතමය පැහැදිළි කිරීමට අනුවත් මූලික කොටස් 8ක් වැඩිවී සෑදුනු කොටස් 16ක් සහ ඉතුරුවන තවත් එක් කොටසක්ද ඇතුළුව කොටස් 17ක් තිබෙන නිසා. මා විසින් ඉදිරිපත් කර ඇති විශ්ව ගණිතයෙන් සෑදුනු පරමාණු (සෑම දෙයකම න්යාය) ගැන මාගේ ගණිතමය සොයාගැනීම නිවැරදි බව තහවුරු වෙනවා.
According to Buddhism Suddhāṭṭhaka (“suddha” for “pure” or fundamental” + “āṭṭha” or “eight”) means a unit of matter consisting of eight fundamental entities. Four of these are the “satara mahā bhūta“ (The Four Great Bhūta. Bhūta is another name for “ghost” because of their elusive nature.): Pathavi (Solid/Earth), āpo (Liquid/Water), tejo (Heat/Fire), vāyo (Gas/Air). These are indeed the most fundamental units of matter, but they cannot be detected by themselves. The four mahā bhūta ('Matter') are with four basic “gati” ('Character of Matter'/ 'Antimatter'): Pathavi gati (hard/coarse), āpo gati (bound/attracted/liquidity), tejo gati (fiery or energetic), vāyo gati (motion). Thus, in Buddha Dhamma, it says, “gati (character) attracts a similar gati”. (*Read more about "The Origin of Matter – Suddhāṭṭhaka" at Pure Dhamma website.)
(+0.0-0.0)3 can make extra dimensions, Higgs boson and etc.
Possible or Probable Outputs of (+0.0-0.0)3
(+0.0-0.0)3 = (+0.0-0.0)x(+0.0-0.0)x(+0.0-0.0)
The Most Possible Output:
(+0.0-0.0)3
= (0.02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0.0 x 0.0 + 0.02)x(+0.0-0.0)
= ((+1-(-1)) x 0.000 - (+1-(-1)) x 0.000)x(+0.0-0.0)
= ((+1-(-1)) x (0.000 - 0.000))x(+0.0-0.0)
(+0.0-0.0)3 = ((+1-(-1)) x (0.000 - 0.000)) x (+0.0-0.0)
I write it like this for identification:
(+0.0-0.0)3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Now we can combine the results of (+0.0-0.0)3 with the results of (+1-(-1))3 to see the most possible total result:
(+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 =
(+ (+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (+ (+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3))
x (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
(+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 =
(+ (+(1))(+1)3 - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1) - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (+ (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1) - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) + (+(1))(-1)3)
- (+ (-(1))(+1)3 - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1) - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (+ (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1) - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-(1))(-1)3)))
x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
It gives 16 results and this unbalanced result (Higgs boson): (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Now I can show all the most possible results (the 16 dimensional forms in atoms called quarks, forces and etc) like this:
Distance of Directions in beginning of the Universe: (+0-0)6
=
i: (+1-(-1))3
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas)
A: + (+1)3
B: - ((+1)3 x (-1)
C: - ((-1)2 x (+1)2))
D: + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (
E: + (+1)2 x (-1)
F: - ((+1)2 x (-1)2
G: - ((-1)3 x (+1)))
H: + (-1)3)
)) x
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the 12 elementary particles (of matter) and 4 basic forces in Standard Model (in particle physics). 12 Elementary particles: (6 quarks:) up, charm, top, Down, Strange, Bottom and (3 electrons:) electron, muon, tau and (three neutrinos:) e, muon, tau. And 4 basic forces: the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force, the weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force.
01: + (+(1))(+1)3
02: - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
03: - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
04: + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
05: + (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
06: - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
07: - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
08: + (+(1))(-1)3
)
- (
09: + (-(1))(+1)3
10: - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
11: - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
12: + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
13: + (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
14: - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
15: - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
16: + (-(1))(-1)3))
))) x
This should be the Higgs boson field in Standard Model (in particle physics):
17: (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Each electron has an electrical charge of -1. Quarks make up protons and neutrons, which, in turn, make up an atom's nucleus. Each proton and each neutron contains three quarks.
The Higgs boson field came from this: (+0.0-0.0)3
And this (+0.0-0.0)3 is combined to this: (+1-(-1))3
So always there is an interaction between the final resultS of this: (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 with this (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which can make a mathematical connection between those things. (Eg: Tau : Muon : Electron = 2000 : 100 : 0.5 = 4000 : 200 : 1)
The reason to the birth of Atoms is the reason to The Origin of Matter and Antimatter. And it is the first part of 'The Theory Of Everything'.
- W. Suresh Madusanka
(The founder of that mathematical explanation about the start of the Universe and Atoms.)
Extra Details:
*The Origin of Matter – Suddhāṭṭhaka: https://puredhamma.net/abhidhamma/the-origin-of-matter-suddhatthaka/
*The amazing Higgs boson: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBIdvow8tY4
*Understand neutrino oscillations: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7H1M5DQa6g
*The Space Is Not Empty: The crazy world of quantum foam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZImA8NLOx8
Do we need a Theory of Everything?
Sabine Hossenfelder:
I get constantly asked if I could please comment on other people’s theories of everything. That could be Garrett Lisi’s E8 theory or Eric Weinstein’s geometric unity or Stephen Wolfram’s idea that the universe is but a big graph, and so on. First I explain what physicists mean by a theory of everything and by grand unification (or a grand unified theory, respectively). Then I explain why the current approaches are no very promising but why, forgive me, I nevertheless think it's good to have them.
KeF:
This why I love your channel , you don't just accept things and you are very critical of the state of today's physics . That's the mentality needed , if we are to keep going forward in the advancement of physics . And yes the universe doesnt give a damn ,what we want or what we think as pretty . It is what is it .
Suresh Madusanka:
I like the video so much, but I have a theory of everything too.
According to Buddhism Suddhāṭṭhaka (“suddha” for “pure” or fundamental” + “āṭṭha” or “eight”) means a unit of matter consisting of eight fundamental entities. Four of these are the “satara mahā bhūta“ (The Four Great Bhūta. Bhūta is another name for “ghost” because of their elusive nature.): Pathavi (Solid/Earth), āpo (Liquid/Water), tejo (Heat/Fire), vāyo (Gas/Air). These are indeed the most fundamental units of matter, but they cannot be detected by themselves. The four mahā bhūta ('Matter') are with four basic “gati” ('Character of Matter'/ 'Antimatter'): Pathavi gati (hard/coarse), āpo gati (bound/attracted/liquidity), tejo gati (fiery or energetic), vāyo gati (motion). Thus, in Buddha Dhamma, it says, “gati (character) attracts a similar gati”. (*Read more about "The Origin of Matter – Suddhāṭṭhaka" at Pure Dhamma website.)
According to my mathematical calculations the Universe can make two objects (Matter and Antimatter) using the 6 gaps of the 6 directions:
(+0-0)3 x (+0-0)3 = Matter x Antimatter
According to this mathematical formula (a+b)2=a2+2ab+b2 we can write (+0-0)2 as 02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0 x 0 + 02
(+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3
(+1-(-1))3 can make 8 dimensional forms of space with a nature of Matter and Antimatter which can cause to convert those 8 dimensional forms of space into 16 quantum dimensional forms of space like Quarks, forces and etc.
(+0.0-0.0)3 can make extra dimensions, Higgs boson and etc.
Possible or Probable Outputs of (+0.0-0.0)3
(+0.0-0.0)3 = (+0.0-0.0)x(+0.0-0.0)x(+0.0-0.0)
The Most Possible Output:
(+0.0-0.0)3
= (0.02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0.0 x 0.0 + 0.02)x(+0.0-0.0)
= ((+1-(-1)) x 0.000 - (+1-(-1)) x 0.000)x(+0.0-0.0)
= ((+1-(-1)) x (0.000 - 0.000))x(+0.0-0.0)
(+0.0-0.0)3 = ((+1-(-1)) x (0.000 - 0.000)) x (+0.0-0.0)
I write it like this for identification:
(+0.0-0.0)3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Now we can combine the results of (+0.0-0.0)3 with the results of (+1-(-1))3 to see the most possible total result:
(+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 =
(+ (+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (+ (+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3))
x (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
(+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 =
(+ (+(1))(+1)3 - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1) - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (+ (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1) - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) + (+(1))(-1)3)
- (+ (-(1))(+1)3 - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1) - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (+ (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1) - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-(1))(-1)3)))
x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
It gives 16 results and this unbalanced result (Higgs boson): (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Now I can show all the most possible results (the 16 dimensional forms in atoms called quarks, forces and etc) like this:
Distance of Directions in beginning of the Universe: (+0-0)6
=
i: (+1-(-1))3
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas)
A: + (+1)3
B: - ((+1)3 x (-1)
C: - ((-1)2 x (+1)2))
D: + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (
E: + (+1)2 x (-1)
F: - ((+1)2 x (-1)2
G: - ((-1)3 x (+1)))
H: + (-1)3)
)) x
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the 12 elementary particles (of matter) and 4 basic forces in Standard Model (in particle physics). 12 Elementary particles: (6 quarks:) up, charm, top, Down, Strange, Bottom and (3 electrons:) electron, muon, tau and (three neutrinos:) e, muon, tau. And 4 basic forces: the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force, the weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force.
01: + (+(1))(+1)3
02: - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
03: - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
04: + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
05: + (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
06: - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
07: - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
08: + (+(1))(-1)3
)
- (
09: + (-(1))(+1)3
10: - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
11: - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
12: + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
13: + (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
14: - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
15: - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
16: + (-(1))(-1)3))
))) x
This should be the Higgs boson in Standard Model (in particle physics):
17: (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Each electron has an electrical charge of -1. Quarks make up protons and neutrons, which, in turn, make up an atom's nucleus. Each proton and each neutron contains three quarks.
The Higgs boson field came from this: (+0.0-0.0)3
And this (+0.0-0.0)3 is combined to this: (+1-(-1))3
So always there is an interaction between the final resultS of this: (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 with this (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which can make a mathematical connection between those things. (Eg: Tau : Muon : Electron = 2000 : 100 : 0.5 = 4000 : 200 : 1)
The reason to the birth of Atoms is the reason to The Origin of Matter and Antimatter. And it is the first part of 'The Theory Of Everything'.
- W. Suresh Madusanka
(The founder of that mathematical explanation about the start of the Universe and Atoms.)
According to Buddhism Suddhāṭṭhaka (“suddha” for “pure” or fundamental” + “āṭṭha” or “eight”) means a unit of matter consisting of eight fundamental entities. Four of these are the “satara mahā bhūta“ (The Four Great Bhūta. Bhūta is another name for “ghost” because of their elusive nature.): Pathavi (Solid/Earth), āpo (Liquid/Water), tejo (Heat/Fire), vāyo (Gas/Air). These are indeed the most fundamental units of matter, but they cannot be detected by themselves. The four mahā bhūta ('Matter') are with four basic “gati” ('Character of Matter'/ 'Antimatter'): Pathavi gati (hard/coarse), āpo gati (bound/attracted/liquidity), tejo gati (fiery or energetic), vāyo gati (motion). Thus, in Buddha Dhamma, it says, “gati (character) attracts a similar gati”. (*Read more about "The Origin of Matter – Suddhāṭṭhaka" at Pure Dhamma website.)
According to my mathematical calculations the Universe can make two objects (Matter and Antimatter) using the 6 gaps of the 6 directions:
(+0-0)3 x (+0-0)3 = Matter x Antimatter
According to this mathematical formula (a+b)2=a2+2ab+b2 we can write (+0-0)2 as 02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0 x 0 + 02
(+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3
(+1-(-1))3 can make 8 dimensional forms of space with a nature of Matter and Antimatter which can cause to convert those 8 dimensional forms of space into 16 quantum dimensional forms of space like Quarks, forces and etc.
(+0.0-0.0)3 can make extra dimensions, Higgs boson and etc.
Possible or Probable Outputs of (+0.0-0.0)3
(+0.0-0.0)3 = (+0.0-0.0)x(+0.0-0.0)x(+0.0-0.0)
The Most Possible Output:
(+0.0-0.0)3
= (0.02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0.0 x 0.0 + 0.02)x(+0.0-0.0)
= ((+1-(-1)) x 0.000 - (+1-(-1)) x 0.000)x(+0.0-0.0)
= ((+1-(-1)) x (0.000 - 0.000))x(+0.0-0.0)
(+0.0-0.0)3 = ((+1-(-1)) x (0.000 - 0.000)) x (+0.0-0.0)
I write it like this for identification:
(+0.0-0.0)3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Now we can combine the results of (+0.0-0.0)3 with the results of (+1-(-1))3 to see the most possible total result:
(+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 =
(+ (+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (+ (+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3))
x (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
(+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 =
(+ (+(1))(+1)3 - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1) - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (+ (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1) - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) + (+(1))(-1)3)
- (+ (-(1))(+1)3 - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1) - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (+ (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1) - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-(1))(-1)3)))
x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
It gives 16 results and this unbalanced result (Higgs boson): (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Now I can show all the most possible results (the 16 dimensional forms in atoms called quarks, forces and etc) like this:
Distance of Directions in beginning of the Universe: (+0-0)6
=
i: (+1-(-1))3
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas)
A: + (+1)3
B: - ((+1)3 x (-1)
C: - ((-1)2 x (+1)2))
D: + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (
E: + (+1)2 x (-1)
F: - ((+1)2 x (-1)2
G: - ((-1)3 x (+1)))
H: + (-1)3)
)) x
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the 12 elementary particles (of matter) and 4 basic forces in Standard Model (in particle physics). 12 Elementary particles: (6 quarks:) up, charm, top, Down, Strange, Bottom and (3 electrons:) electron, muon, tau and (three neutrinos:) e, muon, tau. And 4 basic forces: the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force, the weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force.
01: + (+(1))(+1)3
02: - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
03: - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
04: + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
05: + (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
06: - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
07: - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
08: + (+(1))(-1)3
)
- (
09: + (-(1))(+1)3
10: - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
11: - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
12: + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
13: + (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
14: - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
15: - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
16: + (-(1))(-1)3))
))) x
This should be the Higgs boson in Standard Model (in particle physics):
17: (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Each electron has an electrical charge of -1. Quarks make up protons and neutrons, which, in turn, make up an atom's nucleus. Each proton and each neutron contains three quarks.
The Higgs boson field came from this: (+0.0-0.0)3
And this (+0.0-0.0)3 is combined to this: (+1-(-1))3
So always there is an interaction between the final resultS of this: (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 with this (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which can make a mathematical connection between those things. (Eg: Tau : Muon : Electron = 2000 : 100 : 0.5 = 4000 : 200 : 1)
The reason to the birth of Atoms is the reason to The Origin of Matter and Antimatter. And it is the first part of 'The Theory Of Everything'.
- W. Suresh Madusanka
(The founder of that mathematical explanation about the start of the Universe and Atoms.)
rv706:
@Suresh Madusanka: Your theory definitely needs to be heard. By a psychiatrist.
Suresh Madusanka:
@rv706 , There are space for 6 dimensions because of the 6 directons of the Universe. I have explained how (+1-(-1))3 dimensions combined and make 8 dimensional formations including 4 dimensional forms with 3 dimensions and 4 dimensional forms with 4 dimensions. And then a 5th dimension (+1-(-1)) from this (+0.0-0.0)3 with a strange field (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which caused to form the 6 quarks, 6 leptons, 4 forces and a strange Higgs boson in standard model in particle physics.
The Universe started from 0 with infinity of directions. In line mathematics, x = 0, y = 0, z = 0. But in 3 dimensional mathematics x = +0-0, y = +0-0, z = +0-0. Because if you show a line you should show a direction like -1 or +1, and in line mathematics we don't show a direction when we write 0. but it doesn't mean that 0 doesn't have a relative direction. So the line mathematics we usually use is not the real mathematics. Real mathematics should show directions of 0 too.
Jake Givein:
@Suresh Madusanka You should first read a textbook like Mathematical Methods by Boas to learn some vector analysis and coordinate systems. That will prevent you from saying stupid stuff like that and will improve your understanding of physics.
Suresh Madusanka:
@Jake Givein, Our common knowledge about mathematics don't help us to make that calculation, because if we use a normal calculator to multiply 0 from a 0 then the result it shows is 0 ( wrong mathematics: 0x0 = 0), but in the reality if we multiply 0 from a 0 (mathematically: 0x0), then the result should be 0.0 (mathematically: 0x0 = 0.0). There is a big difference between 0 and 0.0 (Null). Real mathematics can show how forms can come from nothing (without a distance (0 distance = +0-0)) and from the infinity of the 6 directions.
Imagine the start of the Universe. The Universe didn't have a distance to any direction. But the most important thing is that we don't need a distance to show directions, because the 6 directions doesn't require any existence. We usually show directions with a distance like this (If distance from my school to my house = 1Km, then Distance = 1Km and Direction = my school to my house direction): 1km-0km = 1km. But we can show the 6 directions like this too: +0-0 left, +0-0 right, +0-0 up, +0-0 down, +0-0 front, +0-0 back. So we can calculate the thinkness of the Universe like this: (+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0) = (+0-0)6
I think we can explain the birth of Matter and Antimatter mathematically.
We can write gaps of 3 directions like this to calculate a solid object: (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0)
And we can write the gaps of all the 6 directions like 2 objects like this: (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0)
If you calculte those 6 virtual gaps in the Universe mathematically then you will see how the Universe make +1 distance and and -1 distance with +0.0 and -0.0.
I just show the distance like this: +0-0 because it can show a direction without using a distance. I have mentioned a gap between +0 and -0, but that gap doesn't really exist, because there no distance between it. All the 6 directions can have that +0 and -0 gaps without gaps in beginning, which just represents a direction only. But we can use those gaps to calculate 2 solid objects with three dimensions. A gap between left and right direction (+0-0) and the gap between up and down direction (+0-0) and the gap between front and back direction can make an object (like a cube). So same like that the Universe can make two objects (Matter and Antimatter) using the 6 gaps of the 6 directions, but we can calculate it mathematically to find whether it can make a distance inside those objects or not. And those two objects should be the first two solid objects in the Universe. We can calculate it same like we calculate a solid cube. But because we converted 0 into +0-0 to show directions, we can't use 0 to calculate it, so those 2 objects can have a different shape (rounded shape).
(+0-0)3 x (+0-0)3 = Matter x Antimatter
Jake Givein:
@Suresh Madusanka You should put that in a paper and send it to a journal. I'm sure they'll enjoy the entertainment.
In the meantime you should add differential calculus and introductory quantum mechanics to my list of pointers. Otherwise your knowledge will remain the same as your favourite number: 0.
Suresh Madusanka:
@Jake Givein , I'm making another mathematical formula from this (+0-0)6 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 mathematical formula. And then I'll solve it to get the final result from it. I'm going to use my new mathematical formula with the MASS of the particles in standard model to find the speed of light or something like that. Maybe it will be very difficult to solve that mathematical formula to find the speed of light from it, because it is a big mathematical formula which is based on the standard model in particle physics. However, currently I don't know whether it will give me the correct speed of light or not.
I didn't know about the standard model in particle physics when I started to make that calculation around 2 years ago. I just received 8 dimensional formations from it in the beginning, but few weeks ago I just continued that calculation to get the final result, and then I found another dimension (MASS dimension) from it which converted it into 16 dimensional formations with another things (Higgs boson). There are 17 things in the standard model too. However, I'm not a scientist or someone like that, that is why I posted it to here to help someone to disprove my explanation before I show it to mathematicians and scientists.
Thank you for your advice.
Jake Givein:
@Suresh Madusanka Look I'm sure you think you've discovered something here. But what you wrote doesn't mean anything. It's just word salad. If you are interested in fundamental physics and toe's you are going to have to study physics and maths first for ten years or more just to get started. It really takes that long to understand what is already known so you known what needs to be explained next. If you do not have access to a university education you are going to have to read and work through a lot of books. You can find lectures on Youtube, books on Library Genesis and papers on Sci-hub.
Suresh Madusanka:
@Jake Givein , If you don't think that a theory of everything can be a simpIe theory, it is fine, and I can understand you. I hope you checked my first comment which I explained my theory.. (I didn't send it to you.). You can find my theory and conversations from here too: http://buddhist-essentials-and-concepts.blogspot.com/p/my-ideas-and-comments-on-buddhism-page_7.html
Thank you so much for your time and advice.
norman ndaba:
Suresh Madusanka what are you waiting for sir ? Submit a paper to be reviewed by your peers and get this over and done with pronto !
Suresh Madusanka:
@norman ndaba , I'm waiting till I find the speed of light or something like that from a development of it. Sometimes people ignore the cause until they see the effect.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Atom- The Illusion Of Reality (Jim Al-Khalili) - Science Documentary - Reel Truth Science
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Suresh Madusanka:
If you are interested about theories of everything. You can check my theory too:
Distance of Directions in beginning of the Universe: (+0-0)6
=
i: (+1-(-1))3
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas)
A: + (+1)3
B: - ((+1)3 x (-1)
C: - ((-1)2 x (+1)2))
D: + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (
E: + (+1)2 x (-1)
F: - ((+1)2 x (-1)2
G: - ((-1)3 x (+1)))
H: + (-1)3)
)) x
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the 12 elementary particles (of matter) and 4 basic forces in Standard Model (in particle physics). 12 Elementary particles: (6 quarks:) up, charm, top, Down, Strange, Bottom and (3 electrons:) electron, muon, tau and (three neutrinos:) e, muon, tau. And 4 basic forces: the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force, the weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force.
01: + (+(1))(+1)3
02: - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
03: - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
04: + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
05: + (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
06: - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
07: - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
08: + (+(1))(-1)3
)
- (
09: + (-(1))(+1)3
10: - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
11: - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
12: + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
13: + (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
14: - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
15: - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
16: + (-(1))(-1)3))
))) x
This should be the Higgs boson in Standard Model (in particle physics):
17: (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
- W. Suresh Madusanka
I hope it sounds good to you.
I used a special type of methematics to make those calculations, and I call it 3 dimensional mathematics.
En théo:
@Suresh Madusanka
I think youtube it's not the best place to discuss anything that advanced. Surely there are better place on internet for that ?
Suresh Madusanka:
@En théo , Yes, I can understand.
En théo:
@Suresh Madusanka
Good luck with your theory, pal. Hope you get developments.
Suresh Madusanka:
@En théo , Thanks. I'll try to develop it to connect it with Quantum Physics..
Theory of Everything Livestreams with Amazing Guests - PBS Space Time
If you are interested about theories of everything. You can check my theory too:
Distance of Directions in beginning of the Universe: (+0-0)6
=
i: (+1-(-1))3
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas)
A: + (+1)3
B: - ((+1)3 x (-1)
C: - ((-1)2 x (+1)2))
D: + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (
E: + (+1)2 x (-1)
F: - ((+1)2 x (-1)2
G: - ((-1)3 x (+1)))
H: + (-1)3)
)) x
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the 12 elementary particles (of matter) and 4 basic forces in Standard Model (in particle physics). 12 Elementary particles: (6 quarks:) up, charm, top, Down, Strange, Bottom and (3 electrons:) electron, muon, tau and (three neutrinos:) e, muon, tau. And 4 basic forces: the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force, the weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force.
01: + (+(1))(+1)3
02: - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
03: - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
04: + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
05: + (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
06: - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
07: - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
08: + (+(1))(-1)3
)
- (
09: + (-(1))(+1)3
10: - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
11: - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
12: + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
13: + (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
14: - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
15: - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
16: + (-(1))(-1)3))
))) x
This should be the Higgs boson in Standard Model (in particle physics):
17: (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
- W. Suresh Madusanka
I hope it sounds good to you.
I used a special type of methematics to make those calculations, and I call it 3 dimensional mathematics.
En théo:
@Suresh Madusanka
I think youtube it's not the best place to discuss anything that advanced. Surely there are better place on internet for that ?
Suresh Madusanka:
@En théo , Yes, I can understand.
En théo:
@Suresh Madusanka
Good luck with your theory, pal. Hope you get developments.
Suresh Madusanka:
@En théo , Thanks. I'll try to develop it to connect it with Quantum Physics..
----------------------------------------------------------------------
What is a Theory of Everything: Livestream - PBS Space Time
---------------------------------------------------
Roleyboon YouTube:
@Suresh Madusanka Brother, I'm not nearly educated in mathematics enough to fully understand what's going on in this equation, so I apologise.
But, I deeply appreciate you taking the time to show me this. It's exciting to know that there are smart and knowledgeable people out there dedicating real time to exploring these concepts!
What exactly is this equation telling us?
🙏❤
Suresh Madusanka:
@Roleyboon YouTube, Thank you for your reply.
There are few levels in my mathematical calculations, which I have separated using brackets '()' and etc, so it shows a structure, but currently it doesn't explain that whether it has a fixed size for the structure or not, and it can be a series of structures which caused to make many different types of atoms and etc.
We usually show directions with a distance like this (If distance from my school to my house = 1Km, then Distance = 1Km and Direction = my school to my house direction): 1km-0km = 1km. But we can show the 6 directions like this too: +0-0 left, +0-0 right, +0-0 up, +0-0 down, +0-0 front, +0-0 back. So we can calculate the thinkness of the Universe like this: (+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0) = (+0-0)6
What if +0-0 can make +0.0-0.0 and +1-1? Then it should be the start of something (distance and dimensions) of the Universe.
Do you know about this mathematical formula:
(a+b)2=a2+2ab+b2 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjRsTHzwZ8M)
What if the a= +0 and b= -0:
(+0-0)2 = 02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0 x 0 + 02
(+0-0)6 = (+0-0)2 x (+0-0)2 x (+0-0)2 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3
I'm making another mathematical formula from this (+0-0)6 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3 mathematical formula. And then I'll solve it to get the final result from it. I'm going to use my new mathematical formula with the MASS of the particles in standard model to find the speed of light or something like that. Maybe it will be very difficult to solve that mathematical formula to find the speed of light from it, because it is a big mathematical formula which is based on the standard model in particle physics. However, currently I don't know whether it will give me the correct speed of light or not.
I didn't know about the standard model in particle physics when I started to make that calculation around 2 years ago. I just received 8 dimensional formations from it in the beginning, but few weeks ago I just continued that calculation to get the final result, and then I found another dimension (MASS dimension) from it which converted it into 16 dimensional formations with another things (Higgs boson). There are 17 things in the standard model too. However, I'm not a scientist or someone like that, that is why I posted it to here to help someone to disprove my explanation before I show it to mathematicians and scientists.
There are space for 6 dimensions because of the 6 directons of the Universe. I have explained how (+1-(-1))3 dimensions combined and make 8 dimensional formations including 4 dimensional forms with 3 dimensions and 4 dimensional forms with 4 dimensions. And then a 5th dimension (+1-(-1)) from this (+0.0-0.0)3 with a strange field (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which caused to form the 6 quarks, 6 leptons, 4 forces and a strange Higgs boson in standard model in particle physics.
------------------------
Finding The Theory Of Everything
Knowing God’s thoughts: Einstein’s unfinished dream – Public lecture by Dr. Don Lincoln
Suresh Madusanka (1 day ago / 1st-Oct):
This is my theory of everything:
Distance of Directions in beginning of the Universe: (+0-0)6
=
i: (+1-(-1))3
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas)
A: + (+1)3
B: - ((+1)3 x (-1)
C: - ((-1)2 x (+1)2))
D: + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (
E: + (+1)2 x (-1)
F: - ((+1)2 x (-1)2
G: - ((-1)3 x (+1)))
H: + (-1)3)
)) x
ii: (+0.0-0.0)3
= ( This should be the 12 elementary particles (of matter) and 4 basic forces in Standard Model (in particle physics). 12 Elementary particles: (6 quarks:) up, charm, top, Down, Strange, Bottom and (3 electrons:) electron, muon, tau and (three neutrinos:) e, muon, tau. And 4 basic forces: the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force, the weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force.
01: + (+(1))(+1)3
02: - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
03: - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
04: + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
05: + (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
06: - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
07: - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
08: + (+(1))(-1)3
)
- (
09: + (-(1))(+1)3
10: - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1)
11: - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))
12: + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (
13: + (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1)
14: - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2
15: - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))
16: + (-(1))(-1)3))
))) x
This should be the Higgs boson in Standard Model (in particle physics):
17: (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
- W. Suresh Madusanka
If someone can understand it, then I can explain more about it.!
Pero Juric:
The fu*k?
He is Mi and I am Yu:
I guess the next big breakthrough in physics may come from a bright mind with radical new ideas.
So, good on you for trying, I applaude you.
Jimmy:
You’re missing a bracket
He is Mi and I am Yu:
@Jimmy Ah dangit, there goes the nobel prize...
Chris Zachtian:
Zero day
Art Rose:
Please don't.
Suresh Madusanka:
@Jimmy , Yes, I'll correct it.
Suresh Madusanka:
@He is Mi and I am Yu, I was completing few more steps of it from yesterday (1st Oct) morning to until now (2Am) to send it to here:
There is space for 6 dimensions because of the 6 directons of the Universe. I have explained how (+1-(-1))3 dimensions combined and make 8 dimensional formations including 4 dimensional forms with 3 dimensions and 4 dimensional forms with 4 dimensions. And then a 5th dimension (+1-(-1)) from this (+0.0-0.0)3 with a strange field (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which caused to form the 6 quarks, 6 leptons, 4 forces and a strange Higgs boson in standard model in particle physics.
(+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3
(+0.0-0.0)3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Most Possible or Probable Outputs of (+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) :
(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.0-0.0) x (0) x (0) x (+0.0-0.0) ----(A)
(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) x (+0.0x(0)-0.0x(0)) ----(B)
From the (A):
(+0.000 - 0.000) x 1_.. = (+0.0-0.0) x (0) x (0) x 1..x(1/1) ----(P)
((+0.000 - 0.000) x 1_..)/ ((0) x 1..x(1/1)) = (+0.0-0.0) x (0) ----(C)
From the (B) and (C):
(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) x ((+0.000 - 0.000) x 1_..)/ ((0) x 1..x(1/1))
1_.... x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) x (1....x(3/3) x 1_..)/ ((0) x 1..x(1/1)) ----(Q)
1_.... x 1..x(1/1) x (+0.0-0.0) x (0) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_..) = (+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) ----(D)
From the (B) and (D):
(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.0x(0)-0.0x(0)) x 1_.... x 1..x(1/1) x (+0.0-0.0) x (0) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_..)
(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.00-0.00) x (+0.00-0.00) x 1_.... x 1..x(1/1) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_..)
Using this (a+b)2=a2+2ab+b2 Mathematical formula to get the Most Possible or Probable Outputs of this result:
(+0.00-0.00) x (+0.00-0.00) x 1_.... x 1..x(1/1) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_..)
= (0.00^2 - (1...... x 1......) x 0.00 x 0.00 + 0.00^2) x 1_.... x 1....x(3/3) / (1......x(5/5) x 1_..)
= (0.00000 - (1......) x 0.00000 /(5/5) + 0.00000) x 1_.... x 1....x(3/3) / 1_..
= ((0.00000 + 0.00000) x 1....x(3/3) - (1......) x 0.00000 /(5/5) x 1....x(3/3)) x 1_.... / 1_..
Starting to use the 6th dimension. But it makes many small forms of it, because it is unable to make a large main dimension.
= ((0.00000 + 0.00000) x 1....x(3/3) - (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 /(5/5)) x 1_.... / 1_..
= (((1 x 0.00000 + 1 x 0.00000) x 1....x(3/3)) - ((+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 /(5/5))) x 1_.... / 1_..
= (0.00000 x 2...., x (+0.5......-(-0.5......))x(3/3) - (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 /(5/5)) x 1_.... / 1_..
= (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x (0.00000 x 2...., x(3/3) - 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 /(5/5)) x 1_.... / 1_..
= (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x (2...., x(3/3) - 1....x(3/3) /(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / 1_..
= (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 3 x (2....,/3 - 1..../3 /(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / 1_..
= (+1.5......-(-1.5......)) x (2....,/3 - 1..../3 /(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / 1_..
= (+0.5......-(-0.5......) +1.......-(-1.......)) x (2....,/3 - 1..../3 /(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / 1_..
So, the final output of this (+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) is nearly: (+0.5-(-0.5) +1-(-1)) x (2/3 - 1/3 /(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / 1_..
According to the Standard Model of Particle Physics,
the Spin of most elementary particles = 1/2 (or 0.5)
the Charge of some Quarks = 2/3
the Charge of other Quarks = -1/3
the Charge of electrons = -1
According to my mathematical calculations the +1 dimension is unstable because there is already a larger +2/3 dimension against the -1/3 dimension, so that can be the reason to disappear the charge in neutrinos.
I think my mathematical calculations clearly show a similarity to the elementary particles in the Standard Model in Particle Physics.
- W. Suresh Madusanka
(This is my second part of The Theory Of Everything.)
He is Mi and I am Yu:
@Suresh Madusanka I'm not a theoretical physicist, so I'm not sure I fully understand your theory. But nice to hear it matches up with the standard model.
Have you, by any chance, been able to calculate the masses of elementary particles from your theory? Or maybe other constants like the Gravitational constant or Sommerfeld's constant?
Suresh Madusanka (4AM):
@He is Mi and I am Yu, I still didn't try to investigate more about it. And I just took very few hours to think about it yet. I hope to try to calculate the masses and other constants mathematically, but I guess it will take few months to give my full attention for it again. And I'll have to do the investigation alone, but I'll try to collect more details about the standard model to use those things to think more about the mathematical possibilities of my mathematical formulas again soon or later. Thank you so much for your replies.
------------------------
Why Buddhism Is True
Nathaniel Hall:
@Suresh Madusanka Theres really proof supporting buddism?
Suresh Madusanka:
@Nathaniel Hall , There are proofs about rebirth, power of mind (reading and influence mind and etc), evolution (The Buddha said about the evolution of life.), Purification of mind (power of meditation), The natural possibility to perform miracles (Eg: levitation, moving and bending objects from mind) (quantum tunneling, quantum entanglement and etc), Existence of Heavens, and brahma world in other dimensions (Time is a dimension, and the Dark Matter exists in a invisible dimension), Galaxy Clusters, Galaxies and solar systems in Buddhism and etc: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxxQfSqXDbI
Thidaswin Athsara:
@Suresh Madusanka Bro how do you know this much things? I am also learning buddhism and i am also hoping to write a book, or an article about the Buddhism and Science, Where do you live? from where u are, Sri lanka? I am learning from Waharaka thero.
Suresh Madusanka:
@Thidaswin Athsara, You can read my 'bauddha-tharka blogspot'' and buddhist-essentials-and-concepts blogspot' blogs to see how I collected and developed my knowledge about Buddhism, Science and etc. I didn't want to waste my replies, and I wanted to collect and share the reasons why someone should convert to Buddhism (I converted to Buddhism from Roman Catholic), so that is why I made those blogs. My father is a Buddhist but he didn't teach me about Buddhism, but when I was around 7-9 years he told me that Jesus could perform miracles from the power of meditation, but it didn't convert me to Buddhism. I converted to Buddhism because when I was around 11 years old a buddhist asked me to find the reasons to good and bad births, and why some people extremely suffer, and etc. Most religions ignore the suffering which we can clearly see in the animal world, but the Buddhism explain about the suffering of all living beings. I usually try to use a lot of time to think, research, study, analyse before I answer, because I had enough time for it. So if you have enough time, then you can do the same. I'm from Colombo. You can discuss with me online (smlanka.lk@gmail.com, Skype: suresh.slk).
------------------------------------------------
Roger Penrose - Did the Universe Begin?
Suresh Madusanka:
A Big Bang is a start of an Aeon (Kalpa: A great kalpa is 4 medium kalpas). Existence of the Aeons (Kalpa) in Buddhism shows a start and an end of the Universe again and again.
Buddhism explain about four quarters of the Universe from start to the end:
First quarter – time taken for this world to form. (after the Big Bang)
Second quarter – stable duration of this world where all living beings can thrive.
Third quarter – time taken for this world to be destroyed.
Fourth quarter – empty time period. (the accelerated Universe can convert the form into waves)
"A world that is a thousand times a thousandfold minor world system is called a thousand-to-the-second-power middling world system. 514 (3) A world that is a thousand times a thousand-to-the-second-power middling world system is called a thousand-to-the-third-power great world system. Ananda, the Tathagata can convey his voice as far as he wants in a thousand-to-the-third-power great world system." - The Tathagata (The Buddha) (Anguttara Nikaya The Numerical Discourse 277 |Page:314)
If the first 1000 world systems (small universe) = A Galaxy,
then the thousand-to-the-second-power middling world system (1000x1000) = Maybe the 'Dark Matter' combine groups of galaxies making a thousand-to-the-second-power middling world system (middle universe),
And then a 1000 middling world systems (1000x1000x1000) = thousand-to-the-third-power great world system (the triple thousand–great universe)
"All of the great universe [that comprises many thousands of middle and small universes] undergoes the cycle of creation and destruction," (LengthyDiscourses Page: 152)
According to Buddhist Quantum Physics there are 8 elementary ghosts (particles) called Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka). It sounds like that there are 8 invisible elementary particles with some activities as Ghosts. Those 8 different types of activities made information, atoms etc. According to my mathematical calculations the elementary particles (of the standard model in particle physics) received the nature of matter and antimatter. The Universe made only 16 elementary particles with the nature of matter and antimatter and a Higgs boson, and the Universe didn't make another 16 elementary particles with the nature of antimatter only, but maybe the Universe made another 16 elementary particles against the other 16 elementary particles which caused to annihilate each other, but when the dimensional formations used dimensions to form particles, mass and charge between dimensions or something like that caused a tiny unbalance of the Ratio of the Matter quarks and Antimatter quarks in the early Universe (3000000001:3000000000) which caused to survive a set of elementary particles. But the Universe doesn't have a process to make 32 particles at once, and the opposite 16 particles completely vanish during the process. So I think that is why sometimes matter particles make antimatter particles. I think that the quantum nature of matter has a connection to Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas. And the quantum nature of antimatter has a connection to it too, so the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas which comes under 4 elementary ghosts and another 4 with only the characters of the elementary ghosts are the two groups of elementary particles which sounds like a group of matter and a group of antimatter. - Suresh
Finding The Dimensions In The Universe Mathematically:
According to this mathematical formula: (a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2
Distance of Directions in beginning of the Universe: (+0-0)^6
= (+1-(-1))^3 x (+0.0-0.0)^3
= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas
Step 1:
i: (+1-(-1))^3 =
A: + (+1)3
B: - ((+1)3 x (-1)
C: - ((-1)2 x (+1)2))
D: + (-1)2 x (+1)
- (
E: + (+1)2 x (-1)
F: - ((+1)2 x (-1)2
G: - ((-1)3 x (+1)))
H: + (-1)3)
)) x
ii: (+0.0-0.0)^3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
Step 2:
(+1-(-1))^3 x (+(1)-(-(1)))= 8 elementary particles x (+(1)-(-(1))) = 16 elementary particles
Output of this (+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) is nearly: (+0.5-(-0.5) +1-(-1)) x (2/3 - (1/3)xNull/(5/5) + (1/3)xNull/(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / (+Null-Null) x 1_..
According to the Standard Model of Particle Physics,
the Spin of most elementary particles = 1/2 (or 0.5)
the Charge of some Quarks = 2/3
the Charge of other Quarks = -1/3
the Charge of electrons = -1
I think my mathematical calculations clearly show a similarity to the elementary particles in the Standard Model in Particle Physics. - Suresh
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bernard Carr - Why Cosmic Fine-tuning Demands Explanation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWBuVtjPhi0
Suresh Madusanka:
The Universe should be balanced if it is a natural process. So fine-tuning is natural too.
According to Quantum Physics almost all the elemantary particles don't have a single Quantum state until we interact with it to measure it, so the elementary particles are a representation of many dimensions at once, and I think it is not a wave, but it interacts like a wave too. The universe is based on dimensional interactions, and the dimensions don't have a position and a speed because of the singularity of the universe. So the physical meaning of the elemantary particles is a representation of the singularity of the early universe too. We can use the duality of the 6 directions of the universe to find the dimensions of the Universe.
If you can't understand that the 0 should have a direction and it should be represented as (+0-0) with a direction, and you can't use only one (+0-0) to show all the directions then you can't understand this mathematical formula:
The duality of 6 directions and the 6 distances of the first start of the Universe: Matter + Antimatter = (+0-0)^6 + (-0+0)^6
The Universe made only 16 elementary particles with the nature of matter and antimatter and a Higgs boson, but maybe the Universe made another 16 elementary particles against the other 16 elementary particles which caused to annihilate each other, but when the dimensional formations used dimensions to form particles, mass, charge and spin between shared dimensions with dimensional gaps it caused a tiny unbalance of the Ratio of the Matter quarks and Antimatter quarks in the early Universe (3000000001:3000000000) which caused to survive a very small portion of elementary particles (1 from 3000000001).
The early universe was a thing with nothings, so the direction of a nothing (0) thing = +0-0
What if +0-0 can make +0.0-0.0 and +1-1? Then it should be the start of something (distance and dimensions) of the Universe.
According to this mathematical formula:
(a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2
If the, a= +0 and b= -0:
(+0-0)^2 = 0^2 - (+1-(-1)) x 0 x 0 + 0^2
(+0-0)^6 = (+0-0)^2 x (+0-0)^2 x (+0-0)^2 = (+1-(-1))^3 x (+0.0-0.0)^3
If you think you can use Kilogram, Litre, Time, Distance to explain Quantum Physics, then you have a misunderstanding about Quantum physics. Most units are not fundamental, and quantum physics should be based on ratios, dimensions, virtual shapes etc. There is a difference between the Quantum Reality and the Physical Reality. Just because scientists couldn`t discover something from their technology that doesn`t make that thing not scientific. If you want to explain Quantum Physics, then you have to use the Mathematics of the Universe. I already have enough mathematical explanations to understand quantum physics. If you can't understand the real mathematics of the Universe, then you can't understand science too. Maybe there are a lot of people who can't understand the foundations of mathematics. But without mathematics you can't talk about science. Some believers have a blind faith, and they don't like to explore the truth if it is against their faith.!Accrding to Buddhism, one’s character (gati) determines one’s future births. The origin of the smallest unit of matter, called a “suddhāṭṭhaka.” Four of these are the “satara mahā bhūta“ (The Four Great Bhūta. Bhūta is another name for “ghost” because of their elusive nature.): The four mahā bhūta ('Matter') are with four basic “gati”. It says, “gati (character) attracts a similar gati”. Thus “gati” leads to “bhūta,” the first phase of rupa that can be seen (only by Buddha). That is the suddhāṭṭhaka stage. That is where mental energy (immaterial) is converted to matter at the very fundamental stage.
Time was irrelevent even after the big bang because of the high energy in the Universe both during and after the big bang. According to Quantum physics Mass makes the time, and the Higgs field can't give Mass to elementary particle even after the big bang until the Universe start to cool down, and it shows that the Mass is not a part of the calculation of the big bang, and the mass should be a sub dimension. It means that there were 2 main steps to complete in order to make the current Universe. I think these are the 2 steps of the Universe which occurred during the big bang and after the big bang according to the 6 directions and the 6 distances of the first start of the Universe: Matter + Antimatter = (+0-0)^6 + (-0+0)^6
We can use this mathematical formula to find the dimensional vibrations in the Universe: (a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2
This is the calculation of the existing Matter: (+0-0)^6
= (+1-(-1))^3
x (+0.0-0.0)^3
The 2 steps in detail:
(+0-0)^6 =
(i.)
{
(+1-(-1))^3 =
(+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1) - ((+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3)
x
(+0.0-0.0)^3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
}
(ii.)
{
(+ (+(1))(+1)3 - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1) - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (+ (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1) - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) + (+(1))(-1)3)
- (+ (-(1))(+1)3 - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1) - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)
- (+ (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1) - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-(1))(-1)3)))
x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)
}
Output of this (+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) is nearly: (+0.5-(-0.5) +1-(-1)) x (2/3 - (1/3)xNull/(5/5) + (1/3)xNull/(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / (+Null-Null) x 1_..
Accrding to Buddhism, one’s character (gati) determines one’s future births. The origin of the smallest unit of matter, called a “suddhāṭṭhaka.” Four of these are the “satara mahā bhūta“ (The Four Great Bhūta. Bhūta is another name for “ghost” because of their elusive nature.): The four mahā bhūta ('Matter') are with four basic “gati”. It says, “gati (character) attracts a similar gati”. Thus “gati” leads to “bhūta,” the first phase of rupa that can be seen (only by Buddha). That is the suddhāṭṭhaka stage. That is where mental energy (immaterial) is converted to matter at the very fundamental stage.
- W. Suresh Madusanka
Current Employee:
You are smarter than me. I should believe you :)
Suresh Madusanka:
@Current Employee, You don't need to believe mathematics, but you should be intelligent enough to understand it or disprove it. Learn more about Buddhist Cosmology:
The origin of the smallest unit of matter, called a “suddhāṭṭhaka.” (sometimes written as suddhāshtaka).
When enormous numbers of these suddhāṭṭhaka fuse, they get to a more condensed state of “mahā bhūta.” The subtle bodies of Brahmā and some gandhabbā are made of mahā bhūta.
Only when vast amounts of these mahā bhūta fuse together to become even more condensed, that we can see them. At this highly condensed state, the matter is called “dhātu.” Bodies of devas are made of finer dhātu. That is why we cannot see devas, but Brahmā can see them.
Thus our bodies are made of more dense dhātu that we can see. That is why solid objects are called “Pathavi dhātu“; suddhāṭṭhaka in such solid objects have predominantly Pathavi.
According to Buddhist Quantum physics, I guess, the Brahma worlds have only 4 elementry particles with a higgs boson in their standard model of particle physics. And maybe there are only 8 elemantry particles in the standard model of other heavenly worlds. And we have 16 elemantry particles with a higgs boson in our standard model of particle physics. Maybe there is a connection between Heavenly worlds with Dark Matter, and Brahma worlds with Dark Energy too.
I think the Big bang is a part of the cyclic process of the Universe which has a connection with the edge of the Universe. And maybe the big bang is an illusion of the Universe which makes the Universe look very small from the destruction process by removing the Mass from the particle before the next big bang. So if that is just a temporary separation of some groups of particles (earth/sun), then maybe it has a potential to rearrange some major groups of particles (earth/sun) with nearly the same materials again. However, we can't find a good balance in the cosmic background, so it shows the existence of a previous Universe, and every big bang can change the size of the Universe. Maybe we will be able to find the process of the big bang mathematically.- Suresh
Ferdinand Kraft:
@Suresh Madusanka Sureshit hits the fan again.
Suresh Madusanka:
@Ferdinand Kraft, Proofs of Evolution already proved that the messangers of a so-called creator God was lying about the origin of the Humans and Animals: All extant members of Hominidae except humans, Neanderthals, and Denisovans have 24 pairs of chromosomes. Humans have only 23 pairs of chromosomes. Human chromosome 2 is a result of an end-to-end fusion of two ancestral chromosomes.
Humans appear to have lost a functional caspase-12 gene, which in other primates codes for an enzyme that may protect against Alzheimer's disease.
An overwhelming majority of the scientific community accepts evolution as the dominant scientific theory of biological diversity. Nearly every scientific society, representing hundreds of thousands of scientists, has issued statements rejecting intelligent design and a petition supporting the teaching of evolutionary biology was endorsed by 72 US Nobel Prize winners. Additionally, US courts have ruled in favor of teaching evolution in science classrooms, and against teaching creationism,). (professor and author Brian Alters, states that "99.9 percent of scientists accept evolution".[25] A 1991 Gallup poll found that about 5% of American scientists (including those with training outside biology) identified themselves as creationists.
(1.) 97.3% of Biological Sciences department heads accept there is no scientific controversy over evolution. 2.) Only 700 out of 480,000 earth and life scientists (0.14%) subscribe to literal biblical creationism. 3.) Acceptance of evolution tends to increase with level of education.3737
Rebirth:
Near-Death Experiences are directly connected to mind and body separation. So it is an evidence of a life after death. You can
find many peer-reviewed scientific evidences from here: Near-Death Experiences – Academic Publications: virginia .edu/perceptual-studies/publications/academic-publications/near-death-experiences-academic-publications/ Check the bottom of that page to see the next pages.
Suresh Madusanka:
@Ferdinand Kraft, Some believers are not intelligent enough to recognize the shit and lies in some so-called holy books. I converted from Roman Catholic to Buddhism, and now I can clearly see the stupidity in all the Abrahamic religions.
Today (14/10/2020), I tried to find the meaning of my name. According to many languages the name SURESH sounds like SURA + ISH.
Sura means something in Buddhism, Pali, Hinduism, Sanskrit, Jainism, Prakrit, the history of ancient India, Marathi (wisdomlib.org/definition/sura).
Few definitions:
1.) Sura (सुर) refers to a group of deities in Purana and Itihasa (epic history).
2.) Sūra (सूर) is the name of an important person (viz., an Ācārya or Kavi) in Kavya (poetry)
3.) Sura (सुर) means thought about the Divine. Sura also means gods in Vaishnavism (Vaishava dharma)
4.) sura : (m.) a god; deity. | sūra (adj.) valiant; courageous. (m.) a hero; the sun in Pali-English dictionary.
5.) śūra (शूर).—m & a (S) A warrior, a hero, a valiant man. 2 Bold, brave, heroic; and, freely, magnanimous, generous, persevering OR sura (सुर).—m (S) A god or deity in Marathi-English dictionary.
6.) Śūra (शूर).—a. [śūr-ac] Brave, heroic, valiant, mighty OR Sura (सुर).— A god, deity in Sanskrit-English dictionary.
According to Buddhism there are Asuras who fight against Devas (Suras/Gods/Deities).
Deva-Asura War https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asura_(Buddhism)
ISH derived from Sanskrit word Iz (ईश्), literally means master, lord, the supreme spirit. Ish also means desire or wish (www.pitarau.com/meaning-of-ish).
SURESH = SURA + ISH = ?
Suresh Madusanka:
@Ferdinand Kraft, Only the life in Brahma worlds and the life in Heavenly worlds could exist if the Universe were not able to form the life on earth (Human world). According to Buddhism our mind use 4 elementary ghosts (active invisible particles) called Character ('gati') ghosts (Character of 4 matter particles) to make matter too, and according to Buddhism almost all the matter particles (mahā bhūta) in the universe came from an interaction of 'Gati Bhūta' ('Character of matter ghosts'/ 'immaterial particles'). That is where mental energy (immaterial) is converted to matter at the very fundamental stage. So, maybe the Brahma life could form easier than other life forms from a small group of the elementary particles. And then maybe because of an evolutionary process of the brahma life the minds of brahma beings could form particles for heavenly life with a fine-tuning for heavenly life and then the minds of heavenly beings could form particles for human life with a fine-tuning for human life.! However, I think I already found the mathematical reasons for the existence of the charge of the elementary particles of the standard model in particle physics, but I'll try to find the reasons to the existence of the masses and the forces of the particles mathematically.
Ferdinand Kraft:
@Suresh Madusanka I'm not reading this crap
Suresh Madusanka:
@Ferdinand Kraft, It is your belief. That is how beliefs work. If you don't read it, you can't call it a crap. Don't try to believe a God like that.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sir Roger Penrose & William Lane Craig • The Universe: How did it get here & why are we part of it?
Dr0p _b34r_09:
Man. I love scientists/mathematicians like Roger. Open minded, respectful and humble to all. He dose not hate religion but skeptical. Everyone has a right to be so. Roger is a good man.
Suresh Madusanka:
Yes. And Buddhism supports his explanation about previous Aeons: According to Buddhism there were 70 aeons (70 big bangs) when there were no Buddhas. and again there were around 30 aeons (30 big bangs) when there were no Buddhas. Usually a Buddha appear when there are living beings, but we can understand that there are written evidence in Buddhism where clearly stated that there were previous Universes where Buddhas didn't appear. So that sounds like Buddhism talking about probability (maybe natural fine-tuning) too. And it is scientifical. The Buddha said that there were aeons more than the sands in the Ganges river (in india). Maybe the 'Hawking Points in the Cosmic Microwave Background' shows the existence of black holes of the previous aeon.
SuperDukka:
@Suresh Madusanka
The 2,500 years Buddhist suttas also talk about the cosmos being an endless cycle of eons of cosmic expansion and eons of cosmic contraction. It calculated an eon as the time taken for soft cloth to erode one mile cube of mountain by wiping once in 100 years. It said this in relation to our cycles of birth and rebirth. Check out Ian Stevenson work on reincarnation, Raymond Moody on Near Death Experience and Brian Weiss on past live regression which all independently show human consciousness survive death and we live many lives.
Suttas also talk about cosmic spaces being so dark that no light could penetrate (black holes?). It said this in relation to human ignorance that is so dark that no light could penetrate.
It described the end of earth when the sun becomes so strong it burns up the oceans and earth.
Interestingly the sutta also said it is not possible to travel to the end of the cosmos in one's lifetime even if we travel at a speed that flash from one shore to the other shore of the ocean.
It also talk about many world systems (other solar systems?) with living beings each having many realms of existence (dimensions?).
It talk about many living beings in a cup of water though we could not see them with our eyes.
Taken together all these seem to make sense in today's world. Cheers.
Suresh Madusanka:
@SuperDukka, Yes. And I try to explain these things to people too.
----------------------------------------------------
Fine Tuning Scrutinized
------------------------------------------------------------
Lothar Schafer - What is Ultimate Reality?
Suresh Madusanka:
The origin of the smallest unit of matter, called a “suddhāṭṭhaka.” (sometimes written as suddhāshtaka).
One’s character (gati) determines one’s future births. The ability to figure that out is called the “nāmarūpa pariccēda ñāna“ (one understands how the mind is related to matter, i.e., how viññāna acts as the critical link between mind and matter.).
(*Read more about "The Origin of Matter – Suddhāṭṭhaka" at Pure Dhamma website.)
Tunishq Von:
is that means and proves that consiousness exits in reality?and it is not a byproud of brain matter?is everything is immaterial and unphysical.and what is parmatma then.please explain paramatma.
Suresh Madusanka:
@Tunishq Von , No, it means that our mind is also based on the first 4 elementary particles in the Universe called 'Maha Bhūta Gati (Gati Bhūta)' ('Character of matter ghosts/particles') which cause to form another 4 matter elementary particles in the Universe called 'Mahā Bhūta'. And our mind doesn't have a start, because the Universe started to form from the first 4 elementary particles ('Gati Bhūta') which was the first cause to form the mind with the help of other elementary particles. The first relationship of the mind is with the immaterial particles ('Gati Bhūta'), and that immaterial particles caused to make the matter particles ('Mahā Bhūta'), so it sounds like the mind ('Gati Bhūta') made the matter. And mathematically I think the matter particles are under or outside the first 4 elementary particles like this: immaterial particles (matter particles) OR matter particles (immaterial particles). I guess the particles which are inside the bracket caused to form the particles which are outside the bracket. Eg: According to this mathematical formula: (a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2
(+1-(-1))^3 =
(+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1) - ((+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3)
There are two sets:
Outside set:
(+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1)
Inside set:
- ((+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3)
I guess the first 4 elementary particles and the other 4 elementary particles caused to make 2 separate brahma worlds. And those 8 elementary particles caused to make heavenly worlds. And 16 elementary particles caused to make the Human world, because it is using another dimension which caused to make 16 dimensional levels against it as 16 hells (16 Hells = 8 Cold Hells + 8 Hot Hells). Above the hell levels there are 10 levels. 4 levels for some Animals (maybe fish, insects inside the earth etc), Ghosts, Asura, Humans (human level including mammels, birds etc). And there are 5 levels (good heavens), and the last level (6th heaven is a highly enjoying Kaama/Mara heaven) (Dark Matter sounds like heavens). But the next 20 levels (20 brahma levels) are almost neutral (without genders). The first 10 brahma levels enjoy bliss (with body) but the next 10 brahma levels are neutral (with mind).
-----------------------
Biblical Questioner:
One thing that these interviews showcase is that no one knows anything at all. Just conjecture, opinion, theory and creed.
Stefano Portoghesi:
@Suresh Madusanka You said that you guess that the first four elementary particles and the other four elementary particles caused the two separate Brahma worlds ; do you bring any factual evidence in support for your outlandish claim of such event actually having taken place in the universe history ?
Suresh Madusanka:
@Stefano Portoghesi, I just tried to guess the reason to the formation of brahma worlds mathematically, but the most other things are in the Buddhism. I didn't make it myself.
According to the Buddhism there are 16 hells (16 Hells = 8 Cold Hells + 8 Hot Hells). Above the hell levels there are 10 levels. 4 levels for Animals , Ghosts, Asura, Humans. And there are 5 levels (good heavens), and the last level (6th heaven is a highly enjoying Kaama/Mara heaven) (Dark Matter sounds like heavens). But the next 20 levels (20 brahma levels) are almost neutral (without genders). The first 10 brahma levels enjoy bliss (with body) but the next 10 brahma levels are neutral (with mind).
I just added these two lines:
1.) some Animals (maybe fish, insects inside the earth etc)
2.) Humans (human level including mammels, birds etc)
Learn more about Buddhist cosmology: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhist_cosmology
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/ptf/dhamma/sagga/loka.html
------------------------------------------------------------
Escape from Samsara: Introduction to Buddhist Cosmology
Suresh Madusanka:
Quantum Physics will prove a lot of things. Mainly only the Down Quarks and Up Quarks make atoms. There are 4 more Quarks which decay into Down Quark and Up Quark in normal conditions. So the high energies inside earth can make two more types of atoms to make hell worlds and hell beings. According to Buddhism there are mainly two groups of hells called Hot hells and Cold hells too.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Read more (Next Page): The Theory Of Everything - Page 3 https://buddhist-essentials-and-concepts.blogspot.com/p/the-theory-of-everything-page-3.html
Read more (Next Page): The Theory Of Everything - Page 3 https://buddhist-essentials-and-concepts.blogspot.com/p/the-theory-of-everything-page-3.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
We highly admire your helpful comments on our posts.