My ideas and comments on Buddhism - Page 24

The quest for a final theory | Michio Kaku explains string theory | IAI

Suresh Wanayalae:

There are four great material qualities called Solid, Liquid, Heat, and Air. The Buddha discovered those four great elements called Cetu MahaBhuta. Also, he discovered pure eight elements called Suddhattaka and 24 derived material forms that emerged from the four great elements. Material forms exist in a matter zone called Rupa-Kalapa. And matter zones make the matter body (Rupa Sarira/elementary particles), and then they become Matter groups (Rupa Santhana/Atoms). There is a theory that can prove the existence of those material forms.

cosalidra:

If you think your theory is right and you at least have the mathematics to prove it, then you should write to theoretical physicists about it. Write emails/letters with complete details of your theory to Roger Penrose, Brian Greene, Michio Kaku, Lawrence Krauss, Leonard Susskind . A lot of people do that actually, but the problem with all these 'theories of everything' is that, they are either mathematically inconsistent OR the proponent of the theory doesn't properly understand the decades of work that has already been done, sometimes completely undermining the contributions of the best minds that have ever lived, because of their own narcissism and megalomania. At this point, you sound like a conspiracy theorist. I am Indian too but just because it's Indian , doesn't mean its right. Holding too much pride in one's culture is a big problem. Currently Science is the best possible tool we have to understand reality because it never says it has all the answers. It keeps updating and we will eventually get there , but we are not there yet. You sound so confident, its more of an indication of ignorance than knowledge. Whatever you said, I heard about this stuff 12 years ago when I was school but I grew up. I suggest you grow up too.

Suresh Wanayalae:

 @cosalidra , People are reading my research. And a few people recommended it. The most important thing is that when I was developing the theory, I didn't know about those teachings in Buddhism. I developed the theory first, and then I could see a similarity between my theory and Buddhist teachings about matter.

cosalidra:

 @Suresh Wanayalae  If you are truly a scientific researcher, you will consider the possibility that your theory having similarities with Buddhism is a co-incidence. It's NOT impossible that 2 or more people have the exact same ideas. We are all humans. Many humans may think the same thoughts. Its as simple as that.  Also, there are many things that I myself ideate and theorise casually, which i later hear some scientist talk about. It's not such a big deal because it does NOT mean that I am as smart or knowledgeable as the scientist. It was a fluke. You seem to think you are right just because you and Buddha had similar ideas?! That's extremely problematic and borderline delusional. Also Buddha taught spirituality. He made a near- perfect religion. But just because one is a good philosopher, doesn't mean he was a good scientist. That's like saying, I am a great driver, so I am a great pilot too. That's absurd. I suggest you should try to critique youself. Sit down, clear your mind, and try to be skeptical about your own theory.

Suresh Wanayalae:

​ @cosalidra , I can understand. But the theory is based on pure binary mathematics. And it is more fundamental than modern science. E.g., Higgs Boson is not a single element. Buddhism mentions a material form called Jivithaidriya which is similar to a process in the Higgs Boson. Most elementary particles get mass interacting with the Higgs field. Buddhism mentions fundamental natures called Paramartha/Ultimate Dhamma. Those teachings are like quantum physics. As mentioned, there are 28 forms of matter that arose with immaterial elements. But the problem is those material forms are located in matter zones between the 51 smallest moments in the universe. Perhaps, the time in those 51 moments is similar to the duration in Planck time. So it is a very small matter zone. But modern science didn't reach that level yet. So I have to find a solution to connect those binary numbers with quantum physics.

cosalidra:

 @Suresh Wanayalae  What you are saying is not a steady stream of logic. Sounds like sci-fi mumbo-jumbo in movie dialogues used to make everything sound hi-tech and cool. I would suggest again, that if you think your theory is mathematically consistent and deserves to be taken seriously, you should get in touch with some reknowned theoretical physicist. Also i don't think your approach is correct. You cannot use modern science theories as tools to prove other older theories from Hinduism and Buddhism. That's not how science works. That's not science.

Suresh Wanayalae:

 @cosalidra , I didn't want to use Buddhism to prove my theory. But I could use my theory to prove the fundamentals of Buddhism. Also, I can try to explain the process in some extra parameters like Magnetic Monopoles, Axions, Gravitons, and Sterile Neutrino that modern science is trying to understand. I'm just checking the understanding of some people to make the theory more understandable. But I'm not working hard to develop it yet. I trust Buddhism 1000% more than modern science. But some people don't know Buddhism well. That is the problem. Buddhism explains the formation of atoms (Rupa Santhana). So a successful theory can prove the accuracy of those teachings. But modern science hasn't reached high energy levels yet. And their theories don't explain the structure of elementary particles. So the main verification I could use to verify my theory is Buddhism. I can't find people who studied particle physics in my country. So I'm using an online platform to make people aware of that theory. And sometimes I try learning Physics online. However, I don't want to waste my time and argue with you. Bye

Russian Foreign Ministry summons Sri Lankan envoy over detained plane (English)

Suresh Wanayalae:

Seemingly, some hidden invaders try to use illegal and legal methods to hinder the progress of Sri Lanka. Perhaps, they don't like Sri Lanka to be the Rome of Theravada Buddhism. Sri Lanka is a challenge for Abrahamic religions. It is the real issue here.

Why Sri Lanka is Collapsing: the Coming Global Food Crisis

Have We Overlooked Several Hindrances to Buddhist Meditation?

The Big Bang Theory in Buddhism

"Are all things empty? - Nagarjuna & The Buddhist Middle Way"

Kilat:

Emptiness means reality is subjective. There is no underlying truth common to all reality. Even existence isn't objective as nirvana represents. There will always be realities that are complete opposite to another with nothing in common. Our own perception counts as such with most people thinking reality is objective and experiences it as such while some say it is subjective and experiences that way. We can't even agree that reality is subjective because of that.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

There are ultimate realities called Paramartha (Paramount) Dhamma. But those realities are forms of emptiness. Paramartha Dhamma:

1.) Matter/Rupa (4 great fundamental forms + 24 derived material forms) 

ii.) Chaitasika (52 fields of emotions) 

iii.) Citta (mind moment) 

iv.) Nibbana. 

Furthermore, there are small matter zones (Rupa-Kalapa) with 17 Citta/mind moments. There are three 3 moments in a mind moment like a wave moment. That matter zone is like a Planck zone in a Planck length and time. According to my analysis, all the constants in the universe emerged from that Planck zone. They are a lot more explanations about Matter/Rupa in Theravada Abhidhamma.

Mandy S:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  okay- i often think to myself that i need a master's degree in physics in order to be able to think in terms of philosophy . I do read science articles where they always compare the "nano" measurement of the substance to it's "bulk"...but that is i think at the angstrom level? As far as this mystical nous or whatever being from within the Planck?? I never heard that one. I guess that no photon exists with energies higher than the Planck energy, because by the time we reach the Planck energy, the very concept of photons becomes meaningless. /kind of how he described the object concept of "the flower" in this video

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Mandy S, Matter zones must be the quantum fields in the Planck scale because Matter zones are very fundamental and they contain material forms that are interconnected like fields that live and die within 51 universal moments repeatedly. Likely, particles are bulk ripples in the Matter zones. I made a Binary mathematical theory that explains the existence of those material forms and functions (Binary Mathematical Physics and Buddhism). Those explanations are deeper/fundamental than modern science. According to Buddhism, the mind is a process inside the Planck scale. I think the wave function makes the observers live in many different worlds. According to Buddhism, there are 30(+1) planes of existence. There are a lot of details in Buddhism that are compatible with modern science. According to Abhidhamma, the mind lives between two arising and dissolving moments. So like, there are two invisible moments in that anything can exist. Perhaps, Dark Matter exists during those two invisible moments. And maybe, Deva and Brahma beings mainly use Dark matter in two different moments.

Mandy S:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  sounds beautiful chillwdog wow thery are turning on the big hadron CERN today!

i

like i said, i wish i could communicate on that level of physics and mathematics 

it's like..i've read philos and religious texys and i have meditated but i just don't have the education to compare dark matter and psychic states. i wish. Also... you know, it's been really nice talking to you. I never spoke with a Theraveda Buddhist before! I live in the midwest of the united states.  Much Love!

🥲 it sounds awesome

Suresh Wanayalaege:

​ @Mandy S, Thank you for your interest. Stay safe.

The Buddha's Last Teachings by Jack Kornfield

A Video For Academics. One Thing Science Is Learning From Buddhism.

WION Fineprint | Why Buddhism has grown violent in Sri Lanka? | International News: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOCHDt-L_io

khen Sherab:

the news writers should know well about buddism

Gaveen Ranasinghe:

Just to be clear this isn't a fight between  majority vs minorities or buddhism vs minority religions. It's a people's protest  against corrupt government and corrupt politicians and yes, there are corrupt monks who use religion and politics to live a life of luxury, but that doesn't mean you can group all the monks and say they are extremists who use politics to control the country. As for the extremist monks who target minorities, there aren't any monks who oppress people for the sake of the religeon in Sri Lanka. There are ONLY politicians who try to divide people based on religion to gain votes and monks who support them for political benefits.Protesters try their best to peacefully protest but some clashes with police are inevitable because of the behaviour of the police. Politicians are continuously trying to undermine the movement by provoking the protesters using the police trying to turn them into violent protest. Best example is what happend at the PM's House today, police purposefully beat 4 media personnel provoking the protesters. Our main objective is to PEACEFULLY PROTEST. In Sri Lanka Buddhist clergy do have large influence over people, that's why most politicians try to use religion and monks to gain votes. Personally I think religion and politics should be separate but as a country we have a long way to go to reach that point because in Sri Lanka most people seek guidance from monks for their everyday decisions. As for the "Declaration" of the monks in April, it wasn't a threat from monks to burn the whole country down as you show it to be. It was a simple declaration for the government to act in the best interests of the people. Other religious leaders including the cardinal issued such statements. Sometimes religious leaders as a whole issued such statements with monks. We Sri Lankans are not a bunch of fanatics who do violent protests at the whims of clergy. These are peaceful protests organised by people to oust the current government. I don't know if it's intentional or not but I'm feeling you're trying fit the parts of the story into your narrative. So please try to show the large picture and let the people decide, before making a whole religion the villian in the story. Religion isn't the problem just SOME monks and some politicians who use it to their own benefits.

MOON LIGHT 🌙:

Why would everyone talk about suppression done by Buddhist extremists, there are more extremists here in Sri Lanka ; no one bats an eye  ;

khen Sherab:

Buddhism and buddhist are totally different,  buddhism is  decreased by any political protest

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Some followers of corrupted religions try to blame Buddhists to insult Buddhism without giving enough evidence. They know that they can't blame Buddhism. There are a lot of things that we can blame on their religions and followers. That is the problem they have. Church and Christian leaders were involved in the protest from the beginning. Likely, their violent followers covered their faces and burned buses and houses to destroy the tourism industry in Sri Lanka to destroy the economy to remove the Buddhist government in Sri Lanka. The government was not violent because of the Buddhist majority in government. Islamic extremists bombed 8 places in Sri Lanka in 2019, targeting innocent people who went to churches and hotels. They destroyed around 70% of the tourism in Sri Lanka. Also, the Tamil extremist leader Prabakaran was a Christian. And there are a lot of Christian Tamil/Sinhala extremists in Sri Lanka. But foreign media usually don't talk about that. JR Jayawardhana who destroyed the Sri Lankan economy by openly importing goods, and the UNP government that supported minorities developed the war in Sri Lanka. JR Jayawardhana was a former Christian who left Christianity to be the President of Sri Lanka. Theravada Buddhism is the best. Corrupted media and liars try to hide the original Buddhism to protect their religious ignorance and political powers.

Verifying The Origin Of Everything - Mathematical Science and Buddhism: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhNgg6RStiM

here for the dip:

Fascinating. Would you mind putting in lamens terms your theory? I get that your suggesting that the universe can be explained by a mathematical equation. What is the source? Are deeper truths possible to put into language? Even if that means mathematical language?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Nothingness (0) doesn't represent a permanent location. Therefore, that could become (+0.0-0.0) x n. In that case, the size of the universe is 0 to 0.0. But according to my calculation, the universe converted from 0 to 0.00000 making the elementary particles, forces, etc. In that case, the size of the universe is +0.00000-0.00000, and the infinity in the universe is located between +0.00000 and -0.00000. But the universe should continue at the edge (at +0.00000 and -0.00000) making more and more dimensions. The absolute time must continue if there is something even if there is nothing (not even space). And that is why the relative time emerged. Relativeness of the time dimensions is the energy (the universe). The relative time doesn't stop the absolute time in any case. But the relative time can stop relatively. Many directional moments at a moment can make the entire universe while increasing the moments with the expansion of the universe. So the universe is growing making directional moments. I hope you will study it yourself. I'm busy with my work.

here for the dip:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  Yes, I will have to study more to understand it better, but I get it. Brilliant! When considering the space time continuum is just an interface or description of reality, it would make sense that as consciousness evolves and grows in complexity, higher dimensions are created. Thank you so much for the more in depth explanation.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

​ @here for the dip, You are welcome. I'm trying to understand the role (action/dependence) of the observer/consciousness. Thank you for your comments. Have a nice day.

කොහෙද මේ අපාය දේව ලෝක බ්‍රහ්ම ලෝක තියෙන්නේ කොහෙද?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

There is no fixed definition for a Yojana. I think a Yojana is not a fixed distance, and sometimes it depended on the size of a human hand. If a hand of a huge human is around 10 times or 7 times larger than a hand of a very small baby, then a Yojana is a range between about 1.3km to 13km or (4-5)/7 miles to 4-5 miles, and on average about 7km (around 7km at the time of King Asoka). Also, between 7-8 miles in other times/places. So on average, it is about 6 miles. I guess it is a range between about 6/7 miles (1.3km) to 6 miles (10km). It is better to use a Yojana as a range instead of giving it a fixed distance to measure the distances mentioned in Buddhism (in Suttas). Seemingly, Abhidhamma uses a very different range for a Yojana. I guess that range starts from about 50m. Perhaps, it is a range between about 50m to 500m.

Prajna Earth | Journey Into Buddhism FULL SPECIAL | PBS America

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Thank you so much. Buddhists have to learn and practice a lot of things. There are a lot of people who don't know deep Buddhist teachings. There are a lot of things we have to study and research about those teachings. Loka means the world. But Aloka means Light. PrajnAloka is Prajna/Wisdom + Light. Not Prajna Earth.

🎯212 | भड़की हुई कृष्णा भक्तिनि, SCIENCE JOURNEY से Buddh पर LIVE DEBATE करने आयी

--------------------------------------------------------

Charles T. Tart - Does Transpersonal Psychology Revamp Reality?

Purification and Simplification of Consciousness

How Sri Lanka became a Buddhist Country : Complete Story of Buddhism in Sri Lanka

Bodhisattva:
Buddhism was introduced to Sri Lanka in the third century BC and soon it took deep roots in the island nation. When Buddhism spread beyond India, the first nation in which it took root was Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka is considered to have the oldest continuing Buddhist civilization.  The Pali Canon was first written in Sri Lanka. Here Buddhism has survived repeated invasions by colonial forces, large-scale massacres of monks, burnings and destructions of monasteries and libraries and persecution of the lay disciples.  At multiple times the persecution of Buddhism on the Island was so complete that hardly a couple of ordained monks survived and Sri Lanka had to import monks from countries like Thailand and Myanmar to save Buddhism from extinction.  Let’s understand how Buddhism reached this beautiful island, how it was challenged by Indian Kings and later by European colonial powers and missionaries and how it revived from its ashes.
-------------------------------------------------------- 

Buddha - How To Live A Good Life (Buddhism)

Suresh Wanayalaege:

The Buddha didn't tell the monks to be vegetarians. If a monk can somewhat verify that someone didn't kill an animal to cook for the monk, then the monk can accept the food and eat it. Thank you so much.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Universe from the Lord Buddha's eye

According to Lord Buddha’s teachings the universe is infinite in time and space. Infinite in space means length of the universe, width of the universe or number of solar systems (Lokadhātu) in the universe are infinite. The portions which consist of hundred thousand solar systems are called as “Thri Sahashri Loka Datu”. The infinity of the universe has described by a fable in the Dhrama book as follows. If someone takes mustard seeds amount equal to the volume of Thri Sahashri Loka Datu and travel toward to a one direction with putting one seed on one solar system, seeds will finish but still there is no end. Universe is infinity vast but there is nothing which cannot be discoverable by Lord Buddha’s intelligence. By putting as far as possible or by covering anything will not be able to hide from Lord Buddha’s intelligence. (Faster than speed of light is possible according to Buddhim.) For every subjects of this universe there is no diffidence to a Lord Buddha’s intelligence. How much he wants to know this much he will know. For other two enlightenment statuses (Pacceka-Bodhi/Pacceka-Buddha, Savaka-Bhodhi/Arhat) have limits. But Lord Buddha has no limits. So Lord Buddha’s intelligence called “Anavarana Knana(Un-coverable Intelligence)”.  

Universe is Infinite in time means; there is no beginning date or ending date to the universe. Everything around us one day born and one day die. As Buddha’s teaching we cannot think about universe in the same way. How much we consider this much universe exist. But everything is changing always nothing permanent other than the Nirvana. 

In the Buddhism infinite universe is dividing in to units called as Lokadhātu (Sakwala) or world system.  One fully formed world system has one polar mountain (called as Sumeru) and one sun. Also other worlds including a human earth and heavens. 

A collection of 1000 world systems is called as “Sahashri Loka Dhatu”( Sahassī cūlanika Lokadhātu or small chiliocosm).

A collection of 10,000 solar systems are called as “Divi Sahashri Loka Dhatu”( dvisahassī majjimikā lokadhātu, or medium dichiliocosm).

 A collection of 100,000 world systems are called as “Thri Sahashri Loka Datu” (trisāhasra-mahāsāhasra-lokadhātu or great trichiliocosm).

A collection of 1000,000   world systems called as “Chtu Sahashri Loka Datu”. Similar way, 1000x109 (One trillion) world systems called as “Dasa Sahashri Loka Datu”. This may equal to Galaxy in science.

Buddhism descried up to the 1000x1099 world systems (“Sata Sahashri Loka Datu”).

There are Brahmas who govern 1000 world systems (Sahashri Brahma) also Brahmas who govern 10,000 world systems (Divisahashri Brahma).  Similar way higher authority brahmas exist level up to 1000x1099  world systems.  A Brahma who govern 1000x1099  world systems are called as “Sata Sahashri Brahma”. A ‘Sata Sahashri Brahma’ governs world systems more than the amount of atoms in earth.  Still a Buddha is powerful than a Sata Sahashri Brahma, even not comparable.   These world system units form and destroy cyclically without end. 

A Buddhist monk who has well developed supernormal abilities (with meditation), said to be able to announce to all of the animals in a Sahashri Loka Dhatu at once. 

Divi Sahashri Loka Dhatu is Called as "Jhati Kshetra" of Lord Buddha. Thri Sahashri Loka Dhatu Called "Akkna Kshetra" of Lord Buddha or domain of the Lord Buddha. Power of Buddhist Sutras like Atanatiya Sutta, Dhagagga Sutta, Ratana Sutta,  Can be obtain over Thri Sahashri Loka Dhatu by using with developed Sila(virtue described in Buddshim). 

The Lord Buddha many times discourse Dharma (Ultimate truth of a subject) to gods and Brahmas who came from Dasa Sahashri Loka Datu (our galaxy or trillion solar systems around us). Also Gods and Brahmas from Dasa Sahashri Loka Datu came to the Parinirvana of Lord Buddha. When the conception of Lord Buddha, born of Lord Buddha, renunciation of household life, on attaining Buddha hood, at the Buddha's first discourse, taking the decision of leaving last body or at Parinirvana it is said to be, light spread over Dasa Sahashri Loka Datu around us. 

The entire vast infinite universe is Lord Buddha’s “Vishaya Kshetra”. It mean a Lord Buddha can announce or spread light to any living being who living in any place of the universe without any limit, even over Sata Sahashri Loka Datu.

 In a Thri Sahashri Loka Dhatu it can only exist one Lord Buddhas at same time. But can be exist another Lord Buddhas beyond Thri Sahashri Loka Dhatu at once.

          Universe is one of four fully unthinkable (imponderable or Acinteyya) Dharma. Four imponderable Dharmas are:

1.       The Buddha-range of the Buddhas (i.e., the range of powers a Buddha gained as a result of becoming a Buddha)

2.      The Jhana-range

3.      Karma and result

4.      World-range (Universe)

          These four things can’t perfectly analyze even by an ascetic meditator with supernormal abilities, a god or a Brahma. An Arahant being with supernormal abilities can analyze these things in great manner but not perfectly.

For example; all non-noble humans in the world together think and analyze (with the support of physical equipment) the universe to a range with certain accuracy, but an Arahant being with supernormal abilities can analyze universe to a huge range with a great accuracy than that. For another example; somehow all non-noble humans in the world together think and analyze Buddha-Range in some amount to a certain accuracy but An Arahant being can think and analyze very much more range than that to a great accuaracy. Only a Lord Buddha can fully analyze these four things.  Buddha advice to monks, don’t think too much about these four things otherwise you will become a lunatic.

Author's book  "Theories of the Nature and Universe: Comparison of Pure Buddhist Philosophy and Science" 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The True Nature of Now: Meditation and the Predictive Brain | Ruben Laukkonen, Ph.D.

Mass Conversion | BJP's Video Of Delhi 'Mass Conversion' To Buddhism On Dussehra | English News

Wilson Wilson:

I am not Buddhist but who ever  wants to change their religion  it is their own wish nobody has right  to stop what they wants to be

D wiper:

I m Christian but I love budha n his teaching...

Deepan D:

Scheduled castes and OBC or Shudras are not part of the caste system and they are not Hindu's, infact their forefathers religion was Buddhism.

   Kalyan B:

   Give reference👆👆

   Deepan D:

   @Kalyan B  Read Ambedkar book " Who were the Untouchables".

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Some religions used violence to spread their religion. Prabhakaran was a Tamil Christain leader in Sri Lanka who used violence to removed Buddhist culture and Sinhalese people from northeast Sri Lanka and supported the spreading of Christianity there. Some religions try to use Blasphemy Laws to protect their religion and use violence to spread their religion.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sangha Panel: Past, Present and Future of American Buddhism

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Theravada Abhidhamma is the science of Buddhism. And Theravada Suttas are only prescriptions/menus (directions) to understand the science (Abhidhamma) in Buddhism. So I recommend people learning Abhidhamma to understand Buddhism on a deeper level as it is difficult to learn Buddhism using the prescriptions/menus (Sutta). But you would need to have the right faith (Shraddha) to imagine the existence of the ultimate realities (Paramartha Dhamma) mentioned in Abhidhamma.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monk Chat

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Thinking about the feelings that I will receive (resultant/Vipaka) after doing an activity is helpful to reduce or increase the value of that activity. And I meditate using a small loving-kindness meditation, and then I slowly reduce the speed of thinking to help me to sleep faster at night. I felt that the Breathing meditation is not a good meditation to start meditation without calming down the mind first using a thinking meditation because the thinking process continues without control if the mind is not prepared with a good thinking pattern. The fundamentals of Theravada (Abhi/Higher Dhamma) are available in English and online at the International Institute of Theravada. The Buddha taught those teachings to the beings in heaven first. If some modern humans are capable and intelligent enough to understand those teachings, then I think that they should know the existence of those teachings whether they like to study them or not. Those teachings are not like usual Dhamma Talks, and they are highly technical. But it is not good to think that humans don't want to study those teachings to have a deep understanding of Dhamma. 🙏🙏🙏

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

भगवान को साबित करने के लिए भक्तों के भोले तर्क | Argument of Jaya Kishori on the existence of God

Bernardo Kastrup - Part II - The Nature of Reality

Plato And The Creation of the Hebrew Bible - Russell E. Gmirkin

History Valley:

In this episode, Russel E. Gmirkin joins me on the History Valley podcast for the first time to discuss his book Plato and the Creation of the Hebrew Bible. His book claims that the Pentateuch (the Torah) utilized the works of Plato's dialogues.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Catholic meets Sufi, talks about Buddhism (Didn't expect this)

ابو عمر الجبوري:

The more I learn about other religions, the more grateful I am to Allah for being a Muslim.

Deon Liberator:

Jesus said, “Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to such as these.”

But Muhammad at 54 years old took them to bed.

Do trust Jesus or Muhammad for your eternal salvation?

Jesus said he is the only way to get to God. (Messiah)

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Buddhism is scientific. There are ultimate realities called Paramartha (Paramount) Dhamma: 28 Material forms/Rupa (4 great + 24 derived material forms), 52 Mental Factors/fields, mind (Citta) moment, and Nibbana (disappearance). Furthermore, there are small matter zones (Rupa-Kalapa) with 17 Citta/mind moments. There are three 3 moments in a mind moment like a wave moment. A moment of observation in the mind/Citta has a minimum of 7 qualities/activities called 'fair for all the minds' (Sabba Citta Sadharana), the mental activities/factors (Cetasika). It is a big process that happens during a single observation of the mind. Those 7 simultaneous activities are as follows: 1. Touch, Collision (Passa), 2. Feeling, Intensity (Vedana), 3. Signal, Reminder (Sangna), 4. Intention, Action (Chethana), 5. One-pointedness, Concentration (Ekaggatha), 6. Vitality, Life Faculty/Density (Jivitindriya), 7. Mental Advertence, Remembering (Manasikara). Also, there are 52 mental factors/activities that join with the mind/Citta in many different combinations while making a mind/Citta moment. Likely, the mind/Citta doesn't require an external soul to remind the previous activity of the consciousness/Citta. As mentioned in Buddhist texts, a moment of consciousness/Citta is filled with a lot of simultaneous functions that can behave like a stream of souls (living moments). The mind/Citta is NOT the only absolute reality mentioned in those earliest texts. The smallest material/Rupa unit lives for 51 smallest moments repeatedly. Also, the mind/Citta usually continues a series of mind/Citta activities (Citta Vithi) like a thought process within 51 smallest moments. So likely, the mind moment depends on the lifetime of the material units. The Buddha didn't reject the existence of the material world outside of the mind. The mathematical research called verifying the origin of everything explains the existence of those realities.

TheWayToSalvation:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  as a former Buddhist I don't think Siddharta Buddha was a scientist. 

This is another example of people changing his teachings to re-interpret them in their manner.  Like the bhuddists that made him God instead of a teacher. 

Buddhism is a lifestyle but doesn't answer the most inportant questions.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @TheWayToSalvation, The Buddha explained the process of mind and matter. Abhidhamma mentions matter zones that make matter body/particle (Rupa Sarira) that can make a connected Collection/atom (Rupa Santhana). Also, it mentions generations of elements (Rupa Santathi). I could verify it theoretically. The early Buddhist texts mention a rain of energized water (like water sticks, water robs, etc) fills the world (island universe) gradually and stays stably filled for a long time until cosmic air (virtual particles) comes into the filled world (island universe), causing to start the expansion. And then, the world (island universe) stays stably expanded until the contraction.” Virtual particles in space (like air) can come into low-density areas of space (between galaxies) from outside of the island universe until those virtual particles can go there with a maximum speed (up to the speed of light) to distribute virtual particles uniformly between galaxies. Also, the Buddha said, "There comes a time, Vasettha, when, after a long period, this world contracts. At a time of contraction, beings are mostly born in the Abhassara Brahma world. The beings were made of mind, fed on bliss and joy, self-luminous, traveled across the air, and were glorious, and they stayed like that for a very long time. But sooner or later, after a very long period, this world begins to expand again. At a time of expansion, the beings from the Abhassara Brahma world passed away and are mostly reborn in this world. Here they dwell, mind-made, feeding on delight, self-luminous, moving through the air, glorious, and they stay like that for a very long time. At that time, it was pitched darkness all over with no sun or moon,  no day or night.". Buddhism is a very big subject, and most people don't know Buddhism well. I left the Roman Catholic religion when I was 11 years old, and I could find a lot of answers from Buddhism. Buddhist teachings are better than illogical fairy tales.

TheWayToSalvation:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  There is a difference on saying a life or philosophy is "scientific" and sayin I interpret it this way.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @TheWayToSalvation, It is not an interpretation. The Buddha himself said that fundamentally there are 4 great elements (ghosts/Bhutas) called Maha-Bhuta. Also, he said that it made 8 pure elements called Pure Eight (Suddhattaka in Pali), and they made 24 formations that exist in a material zone. What I'm trying to say is that I already discovered those elements mathematically. So it is scientific now.

TheWayToSalvation:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  just because you found it? You do know how scientific research works right?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @TheWayToSalvation, Not only because I found it. The Buddha's explanation is also scientific because he used a different analogy to represent those fundamental elements. He named those fundamental formations with names of qualities that anyone can think to exist in reality. So both ways are scientific.

TheWayToSalvation:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  my point was in order to call it scientific it means another scientist should come to the same results as you

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @TheWayToSalvation, Yes of course. That is undoubtedly possible. Each step in the calculation is derivable. Also, the result of the calculation is compatible with modern science and better than modern scientific explanations. Also, I could find major errors in scientific explanations. E.g., The electric field is actually a magnetic field. And the magnetic field is actually an electric field. It is the end of false interpretations in modern science.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Gino Yu - What is Enlightenment?

Ishikawa:

Best explanation of it.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Yes, I also think so. The buddha said someone to think like this to attain enlightenment: "Seeing is only the seeing, Hearing is only the hearing," etc. And simply, there is nothing else to think more about it to attain Enlightenment if someone can practice it very well.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Life After Leaving Jehovah's Witnesses | The Truth Hurts Podcast Ep.1

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Great conversations. 'Searching what are skillful/good' (Pali: Kin Kusala Gavesi) is an action of the great spiritual practitioners who want to realize the truth (Bodhisathwa). Probably, great emotions are fundamental, and we can cultivate them. The rare and intelligent human life should be directed towards realizations. Thank you a lot.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What is Spirituality? Spiritual Journey by Acharya Prashant REACTION by Foreigners

Ram Setu Movie REVIEW | The Most BASED Film Of 2022?

The Sham Sharma Show:

have you seen Ram Setu? What did you think of the film? Let me know in the comments!

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Rama-Panditha was one previous life of the Buddha. Modern Hinduism likely used that Buddhist tale to make the Hindu story in order to make the Buddha an avatar of Vishnu. It was cheating. According to the Buddhist story, Seetha was Rama's sister. The modern Hindu story made her Rama's wife. And the Buddhist tale didn't mention Lanka, Hanuman, Ravan, and a war with Rama. Most likely, modern Hinduism was developed in south India after the invasion of the south Indian Kalinga Kindom by the north Indian King Ashok.

Saloni:

​Suresh Wanayalaege Hindu dharm is much older than your buddhism and in original ramayan written by maharishi valmiki bhagwan Ram and Mata sita are husband wife bhagwan Ram had no sisters he had only 3 brothers so stop your nonsense you bastard😡

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Saloni , The original story about Rama-Panditha is written in a Buddhist tale. Seetha was Rama's sister as mentioned in that Buddhist tale. Rama-paṇḍita was a Bodhisattva (a previous life of the Buddha), but Hindu Rāma was an Avatars of Vishnu. Avatars appear in post-Vedic literature & included Rāvaṇa while changing 'Sītā' from sister to wife of Rāma. Upanishads are in Sanskrit, but texts are not older than 500 BCE. Jain texts are from the 5th to 3rd BCE. Buddhism mentioned naked monks called 'Nigaṇṭha' ("without knot") and 'Nigaṇṭha Jñātaputta' but Jainism declared him as 'Mahavira'. We can see a big difference between Jainism and Nigaṇṭha group & they abandon the rule of nakedness later. Brahmanism is based on the caste system & animal sacrifices etc. Hinduism and Jainism are later developments of Brahmanism. Sanskrit texts were developed after 500 BCE & increased the powers of some Gods to help Brahmins and caste systems survive & used JĀTAKA #461 for it. You don't have a right to insult people because of your caste system. The caste system is being used for discrimination. So it is a violation of human rights.

Spartan Aryan:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  kya phookh ke aao ho bhai?? 🤣

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Spartan Aryan, The real story about Rama is mentioned in the Buddhist tale. Ramayana is a Big Lie.

Spartan Aryan:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  This means that you haven't learned anything at all. Ramayana predates budhha so how can you say that Ramayan is a lie?! You're stupid.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Spartan Aryan, All the written texts about Rama in modern Hinduism are not older than Buddhism. Don't try to use your imaginations to make the existing texts older than Buddhism. It is difficult to argue with people who don't know the difference between facts and unverifiable imaginations.

Spartan Aryan:

Says the guy who himself doesnt know what he's saying.  The Ramayana has proof in the texts itself. All the major events have been recorded according to some astronomical events and they re all chronologically consistent. So shut your mouth and do some homework first.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Spartan Aryan, The writer or writers of Ramayana could easily use the existing knowledge and discoveries to write it. I don't think that they didn't have a good technology to discover scientific facts and use them to write a new story to make a related history.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A Japanese Technique to Increase Focus & achieve your Goals | Zanshin Explained in Tamil | AE

Dr. Gagan Malik | "Journey from 'Prince Siddhartha' to a Buddhist" | Calm Lotus Joyce | Peace

Balaghat News/ बालाघाट पहुंचे गगन मलिक ने सुनाई थाईलैंड के बौद्ध अम्बेसेडर बनने की कहानी...

Anuradhapura: Sri Lanka's Magnificent Hydraulic Civilisation

📞191 | Jainism, बुद्ध मार्ग से copypest है? | क्या महावीर काल्पनिक है? | Science Journey

Bhikkhu Bodhi on Nibbana as Unconstructed

Suresh Wanayalaege:
Nibbana Dathu (Disappearing Element) is an ultimate reality/moment that causes stopping the mind/Citta according to the teachings in original Theravada Buddhism that contains the correct teachings about Paramartha Dhamma (Ultimate Realities). Most likely, The Nibbana Dathu is the moment that the smallest material zones disappear after the 16th mind moment of its existence. According to early Buddhist commentaries, a material zone disappears before the end of its cyclic lifetime. So the 17 mind moments in it would have a disappearing moment in the end. And a pure mind would use (go through) that moment correctly stopping the continuation of the mind

Tut Dvd:

How is that different from nothingness/ oblivion/ nihilism?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Tut Dvd, If Nibbana Element/Dhatu is a moment of nothingness, we can achieve it if it occurs without a disturbance in that nothingness. But our greed/attachment or purposes would not allow the mind to stop at there.

Tut Dvd:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  But how is Nibbana different from nothingness?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Tut Dvd, I was not talking about Nibbana. I was talking about the Nibbana element/Dhatu. Nibbana is nothingness.

Tut Dvd:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  I like your spirit. Dhatu is just Nibbana, it is just used to give those who have not seen it a general location or sense of what it is, they are not  separate things, Nibbana and Nibbana dhatu. 

In your suttas it mentions the base of nothingness as one of the immaterial Jhana states, and not even the highest. It has different words for Nibbana and nothingness. If Nibbana is nothingness why would this be? Are the texts wrong? It is good you are starting to gain an understanding of the texts, but it will only go so far before experiential perspective is needed. Do you have difficulty sitting in meditation?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Tut Dvd , Abhidharma mentions Nibbana Dathu. And it is something that the Buddha observed mentally. Likely, Nibbana Dhatu is a special mind moment that stops the mind. Nibbana is the result of correctly used Nibbana Dhatu. Nibbana is the discontinuation of the mind moment. I usually listen to meditations. There are not worlds related to Nibbana states according to Theravada Buddhism. Sometimes, I meditate while going to sleep. Nirodha Samapatthi Jhana state is like a Nibbana state because the mind moments are inactive in that state, but it becomes mind moments again because of some causes. Same like that the Nibbana Dhatu is not enough to attain Nibbana.

Tut Dvd:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  Nibbana is everything they always say, but nothing it is described as really helps to understand it until you experience it and then its all clear. The first time I glimpsed it I was blown away. Everything you think of as your "world" is gone, but it is not nothingness. 

The observer, time, space is not present and this is why it is difficult to intellectualize, because ultimately these things will be blown right into hyperspace of sorts. This is why the best advice as was given is to detach, renounce, dissolve self etc, because they all hold you back from really letting go. Bad karma as well, it brings fear and pulls you down and out of state. The formula is there for all to see, but to actually allow yourself to let go of "it all" is easier said then done. You could see it this very night if you sat and allowed yourself to truly let go. We dont need to build a fortified city like Venice on the water, we need a make shift raft to cross the river. Your raft is  good enough, now just let go and cross.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Tut Dvd, Abhidharma teachings are the most intellectual teachings in Buddhism. And there are a lot of good Abhidharma teachers. I started to learn about Abhidharma because of my research about fundamental elements. And I have a lot to learn. You can try to do your own research. It was nice talking with you.

Tut Dvd:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  I would recommend Zen Koans for your level of understanding. Abhidhamma is just digging yourself a deeper hole at this point. Cheers.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Tut Dvd, What is the main Buddhist tradition you follow or followed? Mahayana?

Tut Dvd:

​ @Suresh Wanayalaege  I practiced mostly Theravada for twenty years though of course all the schools have their strengths and weaknesses. All religions for that matter. All have worth, none are perfect.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Tut Dvd, Ok. I was following Theravada too, but I didn't know much about Theravada Abhidharma before. And I was a Roman Catholic until I was around 11 years old. There are 42000 Abhidharma teachings from the 84000 Theravada teachings. So, the Sutta teachings are not enough to understand Theravada Buddhist teachings. Abhidharma is a single discourse, and a great Thero said that it is important to learn Abhidharma to teach Buddhism.

Tut Dvd:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  The abhidhammas are quite the works to be sure. They are additions after the fact and not the teaching of the Buddha however. Certainly some of the most disputed texts from the most divisive times in Buddhist history. 

Sadly most Theros are just regurgitating something they read or learned and do not actually have insight into what they are teaching. If something inside someone needs to anally retentively dissect every moment of mind then more power too them. This is the most work you can do to clear the way, and ultimately it is not that relevant. 

Does Nibbana need abhidhamma, or even this Earth worlds version of Buddhism for that matter? Will Nibbana cease to be if the abhidhamma or Buddhism was gone? Of course not. These are bulldozers to clear the path, not the path itself. I wouldn't get too hung up on it. This is why I mentioned the Koans, they are designed to bypass the intellect, as it becomes one of the biggest hurdles. 

You have an imagine in your mind of you teaching Buddhism. Why? What will that achieve for you? Veneration? Ego gratification? What would motivate this image?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Tut Dvd, If you trust the virtue of early Buddhist Theros, then you would not doubt their teachings. Abhidharma is helpful for Vipassana meditation and to develop the right faith in the Buddha's teachings. The mind needs guidance through Abhidharma to remove misunderstandings about the science of the mind. Also, if you can understand Abhidharma, you will see that only a Buddha could teach Abhidharma. Surprisingly, there are fundamental elements that I can show mathematically and similarly to the fundamental elements mentioned in Abhidharma. So I have no doubts about those teachings.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WHY WE LOVE SRI LANKA 🇱🇰 & WHY YOU SHOULD VISIT!

Two Mad Explorers:
Let us know the other reasons to visit Sri Lanka 🇱🇰 in the comments ❤ Visit Sri Lanka 🇱🇰 there’s no better time than RIGHT NOW ❤

Suresh Wanayalaege:
I hope the government would provide more facilities for tourists without discrimination soon or later. As I know, tourists have to pay money to see some beautiful and historical places in Sri Lanka. Some tourists complain about it, and they say that the tourists who visit their countries don't have to pay extra money to visit public places. Obviously, those places in Sri Lanka are more valuable for Sri Lankans than for tourists. So it is not fair to take money or extra money from them only. I hope the government would remove those discriminations, and encourage tourists to revisit Sri Lanka.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Did the Buddha Quit?

xiao mao:

That's quite interesting. And I really wonder why a supposedly enlightened one has an aversion to noise and clings to silence/calm. 

There's a very helpful statement by Ajahn Chah in this regard: "If my mind doesn’t go out to disturb the noise, the noise won’t disturb me."

 Doug's Dharma:

 Yes exactly, I'll be mentioning that in a video soon! 😉

 Baby Me:

 Namo Buddhaya 🙏😊that is because Lord Buddha preferred calmness , discipline around him .And specifically many monks who followed him was not Arahat at that time. So considering that ,it(noise)  will be really disturb them .😊ofc Buddha didn't get bothered by noise. Like he became Enlightened when mara and his daughters tried to stop that with their tricks. But that didn't even matter a bit for Lord Buddha's disciplined mind. Lord Buddha always prefers peace (As I have heard previous Buddhas also preferred to live in a calm environment, even though they can live in any situation. ) Ex: Lord Buddha had to live 3 months in a rural situation even without proper food. But Lord lived calmly and even was thankful to the person who invited him .

 Suresh Wanayalaege:

 Noise disturbs other practitioners even if it doesn't disturb the Buddha.

 Ratul Roy:

 The statement by Ajah Chah is lately invented... Earlier buddhism seems not so hard ...

Kirtan Rathod:

Hey doug, I'm new in Buddhism, and I want to understand fully about it, so should I read Tripitaka or you have any other suggestions?

 Ishu Free:

 I really recommend you Thripitaka and Dhammapada 😊👍

 Suresh Wanayalaege:

 Abhidharma lessons would help you understand Sutta's teachings deeply.

 Kirtan Rathod:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  thanks

 Doug's Dharma:

 Hi Kirtan, I have a playlist on books that might be helpful: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL0akoU_OszRjBKHxKj98qtSmcLpBmDWkL

Paul Meers:

Thanks so much for exposing this - is this a lesson to make the monks value his teaching more? Or is it the lesson to us that irritants are irritating to sentient beings, regardless of attainment, brilliance?  "A thorn to the first jnana..."  - i love that expression.

 Suresh Wanayalaege:

 Noise disturbs practitioners. It is about the importance of silence.

 Paul Meers:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  Is silence important, and why? I am really disturbed by noise, so I'm trying to work with it as pure energy. It's NOT easy, especially because I'm trained as a musician.

 Suresh Wanayalaege:

​ @Paul Meers, The mind/Citta is very fast, and it absorbs a lot of things even if we don't listen to them intentionally. The lifetime of a mind/Citta moment is very short, and the smallest material units spend 17 mind moments during their lifetime. Likely, the mind moment is smaller than the smallest time called the Planck time. The Buddha said that the mind is a magician, and it moves and changes very faster.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fariba Ahmady

• Ardabil University of Medical Sciences
  
What is the main meaning of being?

This is a question that has been on the human mind for a long time. What is the true meaning of life and exi

How can you find this meaning and how can you live a meaningful life?

Philosophy, mysticism, religion, spirituality, science, psychology, art or what else can answer this human question?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

2 hours ago

'Searching what are skillful/good' (Pali term: Kin Kusala Gavesi) is an action of the great spiritual practitioners who want to realize the truth (Bodhisathwa). Probably, great emotions are fundamental, and we can cultivate them. The rare and intelligent human life should be directed towards realizations. The supreme buddha said, "seeing is only the seeing, hearing is only the hearing," etc. There is nothing else to worry about it.

Buddhism teaches about the smallest matter zones, smallest time, smallest mind moment, and smallest thought processing time. Quantum physics teaches about the smallest time called Planck time. Abhidhamma mentions about 28 matter elements and 52 immaterial paramount emotions. Abhidhamma teachings in Buddhism are like quantum physics. Time makes mind (Citta) and Kamma. Time changes everything, and it is dangerous. I think, attaining Nibbana is like bringing the mind into a relatively timeless state, making the mind (Citta moment) stop making relative time. The mind/Citta is very fast, and it absorbs a lot of things even if we don't listen to them intentionally. The lifetime of a mind/Citta moment is very short, and the smallest material units spend 17 mind moments during their lifetime. Likely, the mind moment is smaller than the smallest time called the Planck time. The Buddha said that the mind is a magician, and it moves and changes very faster.

According to Buddhism, there are 3 main mental qualities called Greed, Anger, and Delusion that technically cause problems. But Karma is a result of 4 main thinking patterns. (Arhat/Enlightened people don't think like that) 1) Taking impermanent things as permanent. 2) Taking suffering as happiness. 3.) Taking non-self as self 4.) Taking bad things as good.

Abhidhamma teachings explain how the mind processes good and bad Karma. There is a fundamental process in the mind called Citta Series/Vithi that receive information within a mind moment and processes our actions within a few mind moments. But the actions of enlightened people don't make good and bad Karma. Their actions are just actions. But they have to face the results of their previous Karma until their last death. Also, there is a mind consciousness that arises on a mental purpose/object. So, not only the 5 senses take the conscious purpose/object. The right mindfulness is supported/motivated by the Mental Factor called Intelligence/Knowledge (Pali: Gnana). Mindfulness is a process of moments of awareness. But mindfulness can be bad/wrong if it is not processed with intelligence/Knowledge (Gnana).

According to the teachings on Paramartha Dhamma (Ultimate Realities), the mind/Citta observes purposes during all the mind/Citta moments. And the Nibbana Dhatu (the element that ceases/disappears or blows out) is an ultimate reality/moment that causes stopping the mind/Citta. Most likely, the Nibbana Dhatu is similar to the 17th mind moment related to the smallest material zones that disappear after the 16th mind moment of its existence, because the 17 mind moment is likely a gap between the death and rebirth of the smallest matter zone. According to early Buddhist commentaries, a material zone disappears before the end of its cyclic lifetime. So the 17 mind moments in it would have a somewhat disappeared mind moment. According to Buddhism, the fully enlightened (Arhat) lay people die within 7 days. So likely, they don't have a purpose to live unless they become Buddhist monks to teach Buddhism. Therefore, a purposeless and unattached mind would go through that Nibbana mindless moment letting it stop the continuation of the mind.

Fariba Ahmady added an answer

November 28

Suresh Wanayalaege Thank you very much for your interesting and long answer. I really appreciate your attention. If it is possible to somehow stop the voice of the mind at any moment and seeing is only seeing and hearing is only hearing and being is only being. At that particular moment, the truth of life and its true meaning can be reached. Sages and wise men and different schools of the world have given different answers to this question. Definitely, meditation can be one of the good meanings to understand the happiness and joy of life.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

🔵 Metaphysics: Karma Path, or SASSATAVADA in Original Buddhism 🤔: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USUsX8UwHsU

Suresh Wanayalaege:
Citta Santhana (Mind Container) is the soul mentioned in Theravada Teachings. Buddhists only deny the existence of a permanent soul.

Theoria Apophasis:

wrong,  bannned

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Theoria Apophasis, There are teachings on Citta Santhana (Mind Container/Capacity/Collection). As mentioned, the matter zones make a matter body/particle (Rupa Sarira) that can make connected formations/atoms (Rupa Santhana). And there are 24 Generations of elements (Rupa Santati). The text mentions the existence of both Matter Santhana and Mind Santhana.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It's an 'atheistic system'. John Paul II on Buddhism: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJoAtIaB0Gw

Suresh Wanayalaege 5 days ago:

Buddhism is scientific. And it explains the nature of reality.

Meister Joshi:

It is impossible for Buddhism to be scientific as science is based upon empiricism ("observation through the senses") and the fundamental teachings of Buddishm is that the senses are not to be trusted (i.e. Mara). Secondly, Buddhism denies the reality of a Creator whereas the most significant scientific pioneers maintained that the mathematical principles of the universe are based upon Divine Intelligence (Nous or Logos i.e. God) and were fashioned by a benevolent Creator. For instance, Isaac Newton (Calculus), George Lemaître (catholic priest who uncovered the Big Bang theory), Pierre Joseph Pelletier (discovery of chlorophyll), Francis Collins (Human Genome Project) among countless others were all devoutly religious.

I wish you a blessed journey my friend and I hope that you get to experience the joy of God someday!

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Meister Joshi, Something wrong could happen to Newton if he denied God. Don't forget what happened to Galileo Galilei and a lot more early scientists. I have a mathematical equation that shows the existence of fundamental realities mentioned in Buddhism. So Buddhism is scientific for me.

Meister Joshi:

​ @Suresh Wanayalaege  Newton actually wrote more about the Bible than about Physics in his private notes so the likelihood of this being the case is rather low. He was also an Alchemist and aimed for spiritual purification through these practices that include long prayers.  Also with all religions including Buddhism atrocities happen as human beings are in a Fallen (imperfect ) state. The Dali Lama for instance  has also started wars (Sino-Tibetan War) and many Christians have been persecuted by Buddhists in the past as well.

Additionally, the persecutions against Gallileo did not happen because of Biblical scripture but because of the Catholic insistence that Aristotle (A Greek Philosopher from the Pre-Christian times) was right about his scientific model of the universe (geocentricism) and occasionally you have people in power who ought not be there. 

We all need to forgive and love one another my friend. Only God can save us. We cannot save ourselves that his how this whole disaster started :D 

" Beloved, let us love one another, for love is from God, and whoever loves has been born of God and knows God.  Anyone who does not love does not know God, because God is love.  In this the love of God was made manifest among us, that God sent his only Son into the world, so that we might live through him. In this is love, not that we have loved God but that he loved us and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins. Beloved, if God so loved us, we also ought to love one another. No one has ever seen God; if we love one another, God abides in us and his love is perfected in us."

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Meister Joshi, Don't tell lies. Buddhists didn't kill Christians. I was a Roman Catholic, and I know History well. Hitler was a Devoted Christian. And Christian Prabhakaran Killed a lot of Buddhist Sinhalese in Sri Lanka. And he removed Buddhists from northeast Sri Lanka. And he supported Christianity. Christian countries used slavery and a lot of violence to spread Christianity.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Meister Joshi, God is only a concept that creationists use to ignore the nature of reality. Roman Church did a lot of Crimes and ignorant activities. They banned zero too. According to Historiens, Plato gave the idea to write the Hebrew bible. I'm not talking about beliefs. There are scientific explanations in Buddhism that anyone can prove. Also, the meditations and ethical teachings in Buddhism are more practical than beliefs.

Meister Joshi:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  I don’t think the human is capable of conceiving such a wonderful thing!   Plus you can just ask Jesus for help and I am sure he will show you personally that if he really is the Son of God, that he does exist and the best part is you get to see for yourself 😌

P.s. I am very close to being a Platonist and the Hebrew Bible is not from Plato. He actually was part of a mystic sect and partaker of the Eleusinian Mysteries who have said to commune with the divine not through concept and theories but real experience.

Meister Joshi:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  actually Hitler was very fond of Hinduism, hence the choice of a Swastika on the flag.  Christianity general is very despised by all forms of social religions as it is a subconscious buffer against psychological projections  (both systems of national socialism and communism hence deliberately target to destabilize churches). I am a native of Germany so I knew first hand that and he believed in the validity of the cast system which is rooted in the biological grounder believe on the supremacy of the Ayran Race both European and of Indian decent.

However, I agree with you all religions have committed atrocities and ultimately we each have to chose ourselves how we relate with the Divine as a individual and not as a institution. 

Finally look up the Buddhist Power Force (BBS) of Sri Lanka who slaughter Christians and Muslims. However again all religious institutions have committed violence against people and ultimately individuals not institutions will be judged.

Peace be with you and good luck on your journey!

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Meister Joshi, It was not only Hiter but also there were photos of Hitler with a lot of Christian priests. Hitler's flag doesn't say that he followed Hinduism. Hitler alone couldn't do it. There are bad teachings in Hebrew Bible. And Christians hated Jews sometimes. Don't make wrong arguments. BBS is a non-violent organization. They tried to spot the extremism and violence of Muslims. They didn't care much about some bad activities of Christians. Don't say very Big lies. Christianity is famous for using a lot of lies.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Meister Joshi, There is a video on that research about Plato's dialogs. It is Plato And The Creation of the Hebrew Bible. According to the research, the story about Moses and the Garden of Eve are later added stories. Buddhism is better than those illogical stories. I personally, discovered a way to the reality of Buddhist teachings about reality. Therefore, I'm sure that the creator God is only a concept, and the universe is completely mathematical. If you can start to use your brain correctly, then I can tell you about it more.

Meister Joshi:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  I am not lying I am only giving an account of things as I have learned about them. I am actually a scientist and have received through training in the art of empirical research and as such the first

mistake I might have to make you aware of is that there is no “the science” as researchers disagree about fundamental ontological questions. There is probably three hundred different theoretical models that attempt to classify the experience of “stress” and it a psycho-physiological manifestations and none of them agree with one another. Scientists always carry out research form an apriori intuitive inclination about the reality of things and although that is probably best not said to one of us as we either might blush or get disgruntled. 

In any event if we aim to inspect which photo shoots Hitler and his famous mustache partook in then we also have to remember and not forget that he also has taken photos during his visitation with the Dali Lama in Tibet, from whence he derived the Aryan mythology in the first place, so I don’t think whether he was fond of posing with the priests or Buddhist monks really holds any water   🤷‍♂️.

Meister Joshi:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  

Plato: Phaedrus

"We saw the blessed sight and vision and were initiated into that which is rightly called the most blessed of mysteries, which we celebrated in a state of perfection, when we were without experience of the evils which awaited us in the time to come, being permitted as initiates to the sight of perfect and simple and calm and happy apparitions, which we saw in the pure light, being ourselves pure and not entombed in this which we carry about with us and call the body, in which we are imprisoned like an oyster in its shell. So much, then, in honor of memory, on account of which I have now spoken at some length, through yearning for the joys of that other time. But beauty,  as I said before, shone in brilliance among those visions; and since we came to earth we have found it shining most clearly through the clearest of our senses; for sight is the sharpest of the physical senses, though wisdom is not seen by it, for wisdom would arouse terrible love, if such a clear image of it were granted as would come through sight, and the same is true of the other lovely realities; but beauty alone has this privilege, and therefore it is most clearly seen [250e] and loveliest. Now he who is not newly initiated, or has been corrupted, does not quickly rise from this world to that other world and to absolute beauty when he sees its namesake here, and so he does not revere it when he looks upon it, but gives himself up to pleasure and like a beast proceeds to lust and begetting" 

Plato, again

"God is transcendent-the highest and most perfect being-and one who uses eternal forms, or archetypes, to fashion a universe that is eternal and uncreated. The order and purpose he gives the universe is limited by the imperfections inherent in material." 

In a sense he agrees with you that the universe is fundamentally mathematical we just believe that there is a Mathematician behind it :D

Suresh Wanayalaege:

​ @Meister Joshi, I know for sure that Christians hated Jews. So don't try to deny it by making lies and jokes. Hitler's regime burned the books of Albert Einstein too. Germany was a powerful Christian country, and Hiter was a devoted Christian as mentioned in many resources. Don't try to hide those details to protect Christianity. However, I didn't want to argue with you about that. Modern Hinduism was a later development of some Hindu creationists. There was no Hinduism in early India. There were only Brahamic Vedas and Brahmanism at the time of the Buddha. Don't try to make the Hebrew Bible good. Hebrew Bible encouraged apostasy laws and a lot of violence. And the God in the Hebrew Bible did a lot of Crimes. So don't try to ignore those things. Don't try to make the imaginary creator God lovely. I'm sure that the western scientific community tries to support creationism. It is very clear to me. So I know that new scientists would believe the lies of some western scientists. Also sometimes, creationists believe their own lies. I know that it is difficult to teach real science to creationists. If you don't want to learn something new that goes against your beliefs, then I can understand the nature of your beliefs. I know that some western scientists think that God is hiding in the gap of science.

Meister Joshi:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  Wikipedia:

"Hitler adopted the swastika,[39] a sacred symbol in Hinduism, and felt that Islam might be compatible with the German people.[40] Some historians argue he was prepared to delay conflicts for political reasons and that his intentions were to eventually eliminate Christianity in Germany, or at least reform it to suit a Nazi outlook.[41]"

"The Bhagavad Gita and the Vedas—especially the Rig Veda—were works that Heinrich Himmler, Hitler's trusted lieutenant, was intimate with and were used by him to justify the genocide of the untermenschen, the subhuman races. Himmler was the head of the SS and the man in charge of the Nazi concentration camps. He is widely held responsible for the Holocaust, the "Final Solution". Some sources claim that Himmler always carried a copy of the Bhagavad Gita with him and read passages from it every night. He called the book his "high Aryan canto" and regularly quoted excerpts from it. He espoused the Vedic caste system and believed that his SS were like the Kshatriyas, warriors who were empowered to kill for a higher purpose."

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Meister Joshi, According to you, a lot of Germans supported Hinduism. Please tell it to Hindus too. I feel sorry about the poor mentality of Christians. I was not only talking about Hitler. Christian and Islamic education have made extremists a lot. So don't try to save the imaginary God from the crimes he caused. Creationism is only a concept. And creationists don't know whether a creator God exists or not. But they try to spread their religion for religious and political reasons. Also, they tried to invade a lot of peaceful countries. And they use their powers to spread violence to remove other religions. The biggest problem is that the western scientific community bends science their best to support creationism.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EX MUSLIM: CAN ISLAM BE REFORMED? 🤔🤔🤔

Suresh Wanayalaege:

The western fake Big Bang theories encouraged creationism. Currently, the western scientific community is the biggest problem in the world because western scientists added the Big Bang and Cosmic Inflation theories to the standard model of cosmology to protect creationism. And they try to ignore Big Bounce models. They try to say that the universe started from Planck Epoch. It is the biggest lie that we should try to remove from science books.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Why Secular Buddhism Is Baloney! | Ajahn Brahmali

Ajahn Brahm & Ven Candā: "Why Ajahn Brahm Comes To England" 24.11.22

PragerFU: Live As If

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Superman came to the Earth and protected Humans according to the Holy Hollywood. If creationists don't care about the name of the creator God, then they can start believing that Superman is the son of the creator God because nothing is wrong with that if the only important thing require to go to heaven is believing any kind of creator God.

C.A.T.:

Interestingly, Superman doesn't require people to love him or grovel before him in order for him to save them.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @C.A.T., Yes. But the holy Hollywood can change the story in upcoming movies to control creationists if creationists like to believe the teachings of Superman in Hollywood movies. So the creationists have to decide which movies they can believe.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

History of Buddhism | Origin of Buddhism | Gautam Buddha | Ancient Indian History | UPSC GS

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Why Is Everything Made Of Atoms?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ae36scLdCsE

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Mathematical Symmetries must be fine-tuned if they are natural. Also, they can make hidden elements and parallel worlds according to my theory of everything. It works very well. And I could verify the theory using modern science and Buddhist science.

Berry Scott:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  This isn't Buddhist doctrine, so much as ancient Sanskrit, if I'm not mistaken...

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Berry Scott, The Big Bounce theory is a Buddhist teaching. Also, the Buddha explained the formation of the smallest elements.

Berry Scott:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  Hmmm... my understanding (albeit limited) is that this stems from older Sanskrit sources... wherein, cycles of cosmic creation (in modern parlance, Big Bounces/Crunches) are compared to the inhalations/exhalations of Brahman... 

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Berry Scott, Oral Sanskrit is very old but the written Sanskrit scripts and texts are not older than 500 BCE. Therefore, Modern Sanskrit and most Sanskrit texts are not older than Buddhism. The Buddha explained a lot of things about the universe, and there were Buddhist universities in India. Hinduism tried to adopt a lot of Buddhist teachings.

Berry Scott:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  '...Hinduism tried to adopt a lot of Buddhist teachings.'

Hmmm... I heard it was the other way round... But I won't argue the point (much), cause, if memory serves, I was still in Jr High, circa 500 BC ;)

 I do know our Dark (don't say Judeo-Masonic, don't say Babylonian Talmudist) Overlords borrowed heavily from Sanskrit mysticism... Erwin Shrodinger was influenced by this, something he likely passed on to Max Planck... Although, to be fair, Max Planck (a self-professed Christian) was also doubtless aware that certain Old Testament scripture seemed to foreshadow thermonuclear warfare...

  xxx

 'Their flesh shall consume away while they stand upon their feet, and their eyes shall consume away in their holes.'  ~  Zechariah 12:14-16

'...great and mighty clouds / shall rise to destroy all the earth and its inhabitants/ and they shall destroy cities and walls, mountains and hills, trees of the forest and grass of the meadows and their grain / no one shall be left to cultivate the earth or to sow it.'  ~ The Book of Esdras 15: 40-42  

 xxx

   ... As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clear-headed science, to the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research about atoms this much: There is no matter as such. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter.' ~ Max Planck 

 'We living beings all belong to one another, we are all actually members or aspects of a single Being, which we may in western terminology call God, while in the Upanishads it is called Brahman.' ~ Max Schrödinger

xxx

PS: PEACE OUT...

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Berry Scott , Brahaman means universe. Also, there are Brahmas in Hinduism and Buddhism. There were ideas about Great-Brahma, but the early Hindu text don't mention it well as I know. Modern Hindusim developed stories about Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva. Also  about Rama and Krishna. Modern science explains the process of forces and matter without a requirement of a creator God, and my theory explains it better. So there is not use to mention a God to explain science. And there are hidden dimensions and worlds according to some modern scientific explanations and my theory. Everything is scientific and I'm developing a theory to prove it.

Berry Scott:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  The notion that you can 'adequately/properly' explain Cosmic Creation without a Creator, without a supernatural, super-sentience, superceding all time/matter/space is LUCIFERIAN, not to mention CHILDISH NONSENSE....

 A fairly modest sized protein is 200 Amino Acids long, to say nothing of ribosomal machinery, ultra-sophisticated protein folding & so-called multi-gene proteins... You couldn't concoct a single novel protein, purely by chance, not in a trillion years...   

... The cosmos has been carefully arranged, from the beginning, for the benefit of fleshly beings like us. If it were otherwise, if any of the laws governing the observable universe, if any of the mathematical constants governing physics, chemistry & biology, were infinitesimally different than their observed values, we wouldn’t be here having this, or any other, conversation. But don't take my word for it:

' A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a superintellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question.' ~ Fred Hoyle 

xxx

PS: Since it is clear, we're about to 'drop the gloves' (hockey, aka ice hockey, parlance), let me appraise you of something. The Dalai Lama is/was a member of The Club of Rome, which makes him an evil agent of faux environmentalism & depopulation eugenics, a Luciferian, 'wolf in sheep's clothing', masquerading as enlightened...

PPS : (Edit: To me, & this is just me talking) 'Brahman' is the Hindu Creator God... Nothing more... Nothing less...

Suresh Wanayalaege:

​ @Berry Scott, Life is not atoms, and life could use atoms. The concept of Intelligent Design is based on misunderstandings about science since the beginning of creationism. Life is a special mathematical process that creates the body of life using atoms. Also, there are processes that make some bodies without life. Buddhism explained the process of the mind and matter very well. And Buddhism doesn't say that life started from atoms. According to Buddhism, life/mind is somewhat fundamental and it existed almost from the beginning of matter. The Buddha said that Human Brahmans and early heavenly Brahmans believed that the Maha-Brahma made the universe. But it was a misunderstanding because there are higher Brahma worlds that survive during the cyclic destruction process of the universe. And the Maha-Bhrama and other Brahmas come from higher Brahma worlds after the formation of the lower worlds. And some Humans contact them and started to believe in a creator of beings called Maha-Brahma. But they can't make worlds.

Berry Scott:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  '...The concept of Intelligent Design is based on misunderstanding about science since the beginning of the creationism...'

  Who/What are you?...  The THOUGHT POLICE?...The official keeper of all theological definitions, including connotations?... Here's a thought, try... TRY to think OUTSIDE THE BOX...rather than trying (and seemingly failing) to regurgitate some rather nebulous  nonsense...

  Newsflash: 'Intelligent Design' means different things to different people... But on a more simple level, as seemingly befits your level of comprehension... It means our universe was no accident...Ditto the life therein...It's ALL a product of preordination &, dare I say, Intelligent Design...

 To reiterate, that which gave rise to time/matter/space... must, by definition, transcend/supercede... time/matter/space..Otherwise..

....'How did the void know it was pregnant with a universe in the first place?'  I'm not a biblical literalist, still, to me, the answer is implicit in the bible's first verse...

 ‘In the beginning God created the heavens & the earth’ (Gen 1:1) literally from chaos & void, in Hebrew 'tohu va-vohu', in Latin, 'Creatio ex Nihilo'... 

'... There was no time & no space, before the beginning', though it smacks of Big Bang cosmology, that insight came from St Augustine...

‘Son, look upon heaven & earth, & all that is in them, & consider that God made them out of nothing’ ~ 2Macc 7:28

‘For the scientist…the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been there for centuries’ ~ Astrophysicist & former NASA scientist Robert Jastrow, author of, 'God and the Astronomers' 

 xxx

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  ...  'Human Brahman's...heavenly Brahamans ...Maha-Brahma...higher Brahma... worlds that survive...cyclic destruction...Brahmas...from higher Brahma worlds... Humans (who) contact them...' ???

  Is this what passes for cogent dialectic now?... AND this from a supposed proponent of mainstream science orthodoxy?  

  If you ever figure out which side of the fence you're on... Supernaturalism? Philosophical materialism? Or Other? Do let us know...

PEACE OUT

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Berry Scott, It is about Supernaturalism. Presumably, the real reason to reject absolute time is related to the influence of creationism in the western world. The Cosmic Inflation theory doesn't explain the nature of energy. The observable very huge early universe could be a result of the conservation of energy laws in the previously existing universe. Therefore, the faster-than-light cosmic expansion hypotheses mentioned in the standard model of cosmology don't represent real science. Science is a belief when it is wrong and doesn't predict both the past and future. And it depends on the reference frame too. Hypothesis like the so-called Planck epoch (10^-43 seconds universe), Grand unification epoch (10^-43 to 10^-36), Inflationary epoch with a rapid expansion of space (emerging a 10.6 light-years universe within 10^-32 seconds), and Quark epoch (10^-12 to 10^-5 seconds after the Big Bang) are misleading interpretations of the theories and experiments. As their interpretations change the theory itself (E.g., they turn General Relativity upside down to predict a tiny singularity with an infinite density), and the collisions between the high-energy particles in the particle accelerators are not like the so-called Big Bang. They try to say that the 27.574 billion light-years large (CMBR distance × 2) early universe or a larger part of the universe emerged and expanded before a second. Likely, some people want to reject the requirement of a larger time to explain the origin of the very huge early universe, and some people try to popularize those hypothetical epochs as if they are real science. We should use the theories and observations correctly. Humans, animals, and trees become larger little by little after their birth, but it doesn’t mean that they were very tiny a few moments before their birth. The observable universe's beginning can't necessarily be a new beginning, and its observable growth doesn't necessarily indicate that it had a new beginning. But it doesn’t mean that there was not a beginning from zero at some point. Please don't use western fake science to explain the existence of the universe.

Berry Scott:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  '...Presumably, the real reason to reject absolute time is related to the influence of creationism in the western world...'

 Or maybe, because absolute time doesn't exist... The old testament Hebrew had a word, 'raqia' which, if memory serves, some see as a veiled reference to the relativistic stretching of spacetime... The Greek/Latin/English bibles translated this as, 'the firmament', in hindsight, a mistranslation, prejudiced by Ptolemaic models of the heavens, or so it is said...

xxx

 PS: You speak of 'Western' Creationism & ID in such a pompous & derogatory fashion,  as if they were naught but primitive superstitions or paint by numbers, religiosity...

... Meanwhile, it's philosophical materialism, atheism and Neo-Darwinian evolution, underpinned by random mutation (which stands in stark contrast to what Alfred Russel Wallace, a contemporary of Darwin, dubbed, 'Intelligent Evolution'), that appears destined for the historical dustbin, as it were

PPS: ...That which I quoted, stuck out... Unfortunately, I don't have time to scrutinize anything else you wrote... I've got to get back to work... 

 Cheers... in keeping with the season

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Berry Scott, If you believe Prof. Albert Einstein you can try to believe his relativity theory. But I'm sure that it is not a fundamental theory. He developed it by looking at emerging forces. Special relativity wouldn’t change absolute time. The so-called relative time is likely an illusion created by relative interactions. The concept of relative time is most likely a wrong interpretation that doesn't represent the fundamental interactions because the fundamental moment would pass relative to the last moment. And the fundamental time is not relative to speed. It is not only a theoretical illusion that is related to special relativity but also the high-energy muon particles that travel faster than their usual speed showed that they can travel long distances without decaying quickly. Some observations like that probably show an illusion. The higher speeds would reduce the decaying process of fundamental waves (elementary particles) because of high-energy quantum jumps or something like that, but it doesn't mean that they didn't experience time.

The wavelength of light (photon) waves increases while traveling long distances, and therefore their energy reduces while traveling. The reason to reduce their wavelength is not the important thing. And their structural change clearly shows that they experienced time. Perhaps, the real problem is not relative to special relativity. Stable wave symmetries of wave particles would reduce the speed of their decaying process. The low-energy muon waves would have a large wave amplitude with a large wavelength that can make the muon wave symmetry unstable, causing it to decay faster. But if the high-energy muon waves have a smaller wavelength with a smaller wave amplitude relative to the low-energy muon, their wave symmetry would be stable, causing them to decay slowly. Electron waves would stay stable because they relatively have very low energy levels and are likely related to protons. The speed of light is not the same for all the observers because only the decaying process in the observers reduces when they travel faster. And when an observer travels at the speed of light, the speed of light that travels with the observer should be equal to zero to the observer relatively. The absolute time and speed don’t depend on wrong interpretations and errors in theories and observations.

The gravitational time dilation likely depends on the density (disturbance) in the medium because the pressure in the medium can reduce the speed of the traveler. Therefore, it is related to speed-dilation in higher density. Have a nice day and best of luck.

Berry Scott:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  '...life/mind is somewhat fundamental and it existed almost from the beginning of matter.'

Sheer Nonsense...Childish, Luciferian Nonsense... Mind is an absolute prerequisite for matter (Doubtless Buddha understood this; it is YOU who are confused). But don't take my word for it :

 'As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clear-headed science, to the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research about atoms this much: There is no matter as such. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent mind. This mind is the matrix of all matter.'   ~ Max Planck

xxx

PS: Yes, I know...I posted that Planck quote earlier... Alas, it's become clear to me, you're in dire need of repetition

PPS: Repeat after me... 'Cogito Ergo Sum'... 'Cogito Ergo Sum'...'Cogito Ergo Sum'...Cogito...

PEACE OUT

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Berry Scott, The real mind/Citta is not a living being. It is only a special observation (Vi+Gnana= Vingnana or Vinnana) similar to the observations of material objects. The only difference is the mind is a little bit special. And the Mind/Citta was not a life from the beginning and it is not a life in reality. The problem of the mind/Citta is its continuation like a living being. Probably, the mind/Citta receives, calculates, and outputs information like a calculator, and processes information like making judgments. According to the teachings on Paramartha Dhamma (Ultimate Realities), the mind/Citta observes purposes during all the mind/Citta moments. And the Nibbana Dhatu (the element that ceases/disappears or blows out) is an ultimate reality/moment that causes stopping the mind/Citta. Most likely, the Nibbana Dhatu is similar to the 17th mind moment related to the smallest material zones that disappear after the 16th mind moment of its existence because the 17 mind moment is likely a gap between the death and rebirth of the material zone. According to early Buddhist commentaries, a material zone disappears before the end of its cyclic lifetime. So the 17 mind moments in it would have a somewhat disappeared mind moment. Also, I can prove the existence of the fundamental material units using a special calculation.

Berry Scott:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  ‘The real mind/Citta is not a living being… The real mind/Citta is not a living being. It is only a special observation…similar to the observations of material objects. The only difference is the mind is a little bit special. And the Mind/Citta was not a life from the beginning and it is not a life in reality. The problem of the mind/Citta is its continuation like a living being. Probably, the mind/Citta receives, calculates, and outputs information like a calculator, and processes information like making judgments.'

Hmmm…Is this what is supposed to pass for a carefully crafted philosophical worldview? …

... Sorry to burst your space/time bubble…But it’s just MEANINGLESS BABBLE… a muddy cup of tea… devoid of nourishment… a smokey chasm of confusion… not the least bit enlightened...

... Borrowing from James Jeans, ‘The universe looks more and more like a great thought, rather than a great machine.’ 

xxx 

 As mentioned earlier, I’m NOT a biblical literalist… Still it’s increasingly clear to me, that you could derive enormous benefit from a little bible time… 

...Consider: The bible is the best- selling book of all time, the cross the most powerful symbol of all time, plus the whole world marks time, marks the passage of the years, beginning (however imperfectly, in keeping with the notion that Man is still a work in progress) with Anno Domini...

.. Unlike you, I’m convinced that none of the above was/is commensurate with an accidental  view of history; it's HIS-Story... That is to say, part of Divine Plan…

xxx

‘For you will no longer remember the oracle of the Lord, because every man’s own word will become the oracle (shades of the tower of Babel & the whore of Babylon), and you have perverted the words of the living God, the Lord of hosts, our God.' ~ Jer 23:36

‘But at the end of that period, I, Nebuchadnezzar, raised my eyes toward heaven and my reason returned to me, and I blessed the Most High and praised and honored Him who lives forever; For His dominion is an everlasting dominion, And His kingdom endures from generation to generation.’  ~ Dan 4:34

'For He is the living God and enduring forever, And His kingdom is one which will not be destroyed, And His dominion will be forever.' ~ Dan 6:26

 Xxx

 I don’t want to pull rank on you (much), but from my perspective, I’m talking to a child, a petulant child (albeit a child of promise)...

... Not to be overly dismissive, but again from my perspective, this conversation seems beneath me… 

 ...Alas, it's not so much a conversation anymore, as a free lecture (Take it or leave it?) 

Either way... Good Luck to You…

Peace Out…

Suresh Wanayalaege:

​ @Berry Scott, The mind can be a process that moves from moment to moment. It is difficult to say that you see two light particles at once at a single smallest moment. The mind is fast enough to construct pictures. I said about it because I know the process in matter units that uses the smallest moments in the universe. If you are not interested I don't want to explain it to you. I was a Roman Catholic until I was around 11 years old. I studied it in my school days. Bye.

Berry Scott:

For the record, I'm NOT a fan of Roman Catholicism at all, this has been (with occasional reprieves) adversely influenced  by a Luciferian & criminal, crypto-J, Jesuit faction, since the days of Ignatius Loyola...

...The Last 3 Popes (Protector of Pedophiles Everywhere) have been crypto-Js, arguably, Babylonian & Talmudic 'wolves in sheep's clothing' accused of Satanic Pedophilia by Malachi Martin, Gabriele Amorth, Alfred J Kunz & others, in keeping with St Malachy's 12th century Papal prophecy, along with this somewhat parallel forecast:

    ‘Rome will lose faith & become the seat of the Antichrist.’                                                                                                      ~ Our Lady of Salette,1846

xxx

To me, you keep clinging to a crumbling materialistic & mechanistic model for explaining the mysteries of mind, & it's like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole, which is why your explanations are so hopelessly muddled...

xxx  

 Test subjects, hooked up to EEGs, watched screens where colored &/or gray scale dots appeared at random. The moment the image is perceived by the conscious mind, massive numbers of neurons seem to fire in unison... To me, there's something about this which smacks of Quantum Entanglement & Einstein's 'Spooky Action at at Distance'  

xxx

 Test subjects, again hooked up to EEGs, are shown images, selected at random by random number generating computers. The images, flashing on & off the screen like a heartbeat, are of 3 types, sexually explicit, violent or neutral. Each type of image produces a telltale signature brainwave pattern...

... But after a while, those signature brain wave patterns start appearing a fraction of a second BEFORE the image appears, & they always guess right. Again , to me, this is a Quantum Effect, which speaks to the supernatural nature of nature, which speaks to the fact (to paraphrase Shakespeare) that there's more to heaven & earth Horatio, than dreamt of in your hopelessly materialistic & mechanistic philosophy... 

...And we could make similar arguments with respect to the myriad mysteries associated with everything from slime molds (routinely solving the traveling salesman problem, confounding colossal computers), to the strangely synchronized movements of flocks of birds & schools of fish, to various enigmas associated with social insects, to what some have taken to calling Quantum Evolution & MORE...

xxx

PS: You can share whatever you please, but if your gonna try to use crumbling materialist paradigms to explain MIND... I'm telling you in advance, it's a LOST CAUSE...

Suresh Wanayalaege:

​ @Berry Scott, As I told you before the mind/Citta is a calculator that can use the information to calculate and predict or react faster than we think. There are three moments in the mind/Citta and matter that continues in the smallest matter units. And if universal mathematics explains the existence of the smallest material units and the moments in them, then it is more reliable than concepts and assumptions about material processes. Mathematical explanations make predictable results. And I could discover and predict a lot of things using that theory. Creationism and the concept of God are definitely not scientific. But unfortunately, a lot of people can't understand the difference between science and imagination. Bye.

Berry Scott:

​ @Suresh Wanayalaege   If it's all materialistic/mechanistic cause & effect ... that would mean free will doesn't exist... Common sense, if you had any, would surely tell you how nonsensical that is???

Suresh Wanayalaege:

​ @Berry Scott, We usually react to a resultant that we don't choose, and our reactions usually depend on our habits and the situation of the mind/Citta. Therefore, it is somewhat deterministic. But it doesn't mean that it is always predictable. Our decisions and reaction depend on some probabilistic patterns. We can try to predict the probabilistic results, but sometimes we can't tell for sure what will happen from those probabilistic patterns because a special choice would depend on highly unpredictable possibilities. According to the Buddha's teachings, the result depends on our choice even if there are very limited choices. But some people's habits help to predict their future. Therefore, there are both predictable and unpredictable things or people. The Buddha did a lot of practice over many lifetimes to make him fortunate enough to complete his task. Probably, the first thing that comes to our minds would depend on some previous reasons, but if we use enough time to think about it without making a choice quickly then we would be able to make an unpredicted choice from the limited choices we had. But sometimes we may have only one choice because of some strong habits.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Does the Universe Bounce? #shorts: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/wiGIlbIvvrs

Suresh Wanayalaege:

The Buddha explained the Big Bounce. If gravitons accelerated matter into the center of the universe, then Matter could become energy before coming to the center of the bounced area of the universe. The previous universe could have ended with a rain of high-energy plasma of elementary particles that filled the universe after the contraction (Sanvattai). And then the universe could start to expand (Vivatta) during the first exchange of energy from one side to another. And the duration of the further expansion (Vivattai) is similar to the duration of the first energy expansion. Again it can contract (Sanvatta) within a similar duration. General Relativity doesn't allow faster-than-light expansion. Someone with a good brain should be able to understand that the universe didn't have a good reason to be very small like an atom or elementary particle. Space doesn't have a process that can expand matter quickly making cosmic inflation. Space is still increasing. So the Big Bang didn't create space to expand matter. A flat universe doesn't support the concept of Cosmic Inflation from a curved singularity. CMB Radiation showed that the universe was not a curved universe. So the Big Bang was not like a breaking of a curved geometry of spacetime. Therefore, the CMB radiation doesn't show that the Big Bang created matter and space breaking the curvature of the so-called singularity. Seemingly, matter came closer to each other on gravitational forces that acted in the flat universe that already existed. So the Big Bang was likely a Big Exchange of matter from one side to another. And there was no need for Cosmic Inflation to expand matter and energy faster than light. Scientists can't detect the duration of the existence of accelerated particles to decide the time of the Big Bang. The temperature between collisions could be somewhat uniform because of the exchange of energy from one side of the universe to another. Those collisions couldn't happen much closer to each to become one single largest Black Hole because of the large size of the universe and the crossover of gravitons from one side to another. The Buddha mentioned island universes. Everything would come back to a center of gravity in this island universe. Gravity would bring all the matter back to the center as a rain of High Energy Plasma of elementary particles. Gravitons would turn back and return to the center of the universe and accelerate all the matter making them high-energy particles. And then, they would cool down and become compact objects again. Perhaps, the Cosmic expansion happened during the Vivatta Asaṃkhyeya Kalpa. And then, galaxies formed during the Vivattai Kalpa. The universe would contract during the Sanvatta Kalpa. Planets keep destroying during the Sanvattai Kalpa. If we put the Cosmic expansion to the end, then Mahā-Kalpa starts from Vivattai Kalpa. Thank you.

Mr Cloudman:

Where did you get your ideas from?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Mr Cloudman, The Buddha explained it well. And I discovered fundamental fields of matter and forces theoretically. Also, I could verify that theory using modern science and Buddha's teachings on fundamental elements.

Mr Cloudman:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  Are you a big fan of Deepak Chopra by any chance?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Mr Cloudman, No. He doesn't know Buddhism well.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is The West Ruining Buddhism? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZQyYEbqTwDY

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Buddhism is extremely scientific, and the Abhidhamma teachings are the most scientific teachings of Buddhism. And Theravada Suttas are only prescriptions/menus (directions) to understand the science (Abhidhamma) in Buddhism. So I recommend people learning Abhidhamma to understand Buddhism on a deeper level as it is difficult to learn Buddhism using the prescriptions/menus (Sutta). But you would need to have the right faith (Shraddha) to imagine the existence of the ultimate realities (Paramartha Dhamma) mentioned in Abhidhamma. The right mindfulness is supported/motivated by the Mental Factor called Intelligence/Knowledge (Pali: Gnana). Mindfulness is a process of moments of awareness. But mindfulness can be bad/wrong if it is not processed with intelligence/Knowledge (Gnana). I think we need a lifetime to study Buddhism. So it is better if you can follow the discourses in Buddhism to be familiar first. According to Buddhism, there were around 62 types of beliefs (ditties) in India at the time of the Buddha. There were wandering ascetics called "Parivrajaka", and according to Buddhism some of them were just going around spirituality without reaching a destination. Therefore sometimes practicing concentration (Samatha) meditation is not enough to reach a destination. Mindfulness (Satipatthana or Vipassana) meditation is the best way to reach the destination called the state of Nirvana (enlightenment). Best of luck.

Jacob B:

Abhidhamma is nonsense, psuedophilosophy which was overthrown by modern physics a long time ago.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Jacob B, Abhidhamma explains the real nature of reality, and it is scientific. The existence of some fundamental elements mentioned in Abhidhamma texts is mathematically provable. And I could prove it. Abhidhamma teaches about the smallest matter zones, smallest time, smallest mind moment, and smallest thought processing time. Quantum physics teaches about the smallest time called Planck time. Abhidhamma mentions about 28 matter elements and 52 immaterial paramount emotions. Abhidhamma teachings in Buddhism are like quantum physics. The lifetime of a mind/Citta moment is very short, and the smallest material units spend 17 mind moments during their lifetime. Likely, the mind moment is smaller than the smallest time called the Planck time. The Buddha said that the mind is a magician, and it moves and changes very faster. I wrote a paper showing the similarities between Abhidhamma and mathematical physics.

the flying dutchguy:

extremely scientific i would not say. like start with the soul. wich has never been shown to be true in any way. most people use the word to describe conciousness. wich doesnt come from some spirit thats some non material magical thing. but we know conciousness is a product of the brain. without brain there is no conciousness. a change in the brain can cause a change in your personality. it can turn you into an entirely different person. and once the brain dies. your conciousness dies with it

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @the flying dutchguy, Perhaps, the impermanent soul is like a hidden quantum object. However, People who had NDEs say that they became a very large entity in space without a body. And they become small again when they come back to their body. This is the truth: "Near-death experiences are reported by 10 to 20 percent of people who survived cardiac arrest.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

​ @the flying dutchguy, Abhidhamma is extremely scientific because I could mathematically derive the fundamental elements mentioned in Abhidhamma. Those explanations about realities are extremely scientific because they are correct. Wrong science is a belief even if people think that it is scientific. Nature is scientific whether you can explain it scientifically or not.

Ghezero Fika:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  science is based on observation and experiments what experiments did the Buddhist do to arrive at such a conclusion, "they realised it in their trace" or other bs is not scientific at all. overusing quantum this quantum that😹😹 Doesn't make anything scientific.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Ghezero Fika, The supreme Buddha observed the laws of nature better than modern science. There are ways that we can use to verify a theory. Mathematical explanations make predictable results. And I could discover and predict a lot of things using that theory. Also, I could mathematically derive the fundamental elements mentioned in early Abhi (Higher) Dhamma (Realities) teachings. According to those teachings, there are 8 fundamental formations called Pure Eight, including 4 great fundamental elements (ghosts/Bhutas). And there are 28 material phenomena with 4 fundamental material phenomena and 24 derived material phenomena. According to my calculations, there are 4 fundamental dimensional sets (elements) in the matter area of my dimensional structure, so there are 28 material phenomena in my dimensional structure too. Moments of time at each location could make the relative time and distance. There is the smallest time and length in this universe. But scientists can't explain the reason to exist those Planck constants. And they don't know the origin of waves and the entanglement of waves with hidden elements. So they can't explain the other constants too. And without explaining the fundamental interactions they can't explain the nature of constants and about hidden constants. If the Planck length is the smallest length of the smallest matter zone that means that there is one or more simple fundamental structure that makes all the matter including all the constants by emergence from that. According to the early Buddhist teachings, there are 17 moments in a lifetime of a matter zone. And there are 28 material elements in those matter zones/fields with the interactions of the 8 pure elements and the 4 great elements. The collapse of the wave function suggests the existence of hidden worlds. The Planck constant is the fundamental constant of the visible world, but a calculation shows the presence of 32 parallel Planck constants. Also, some early teachings explain the existence of 31 planes of existence. So try to find real science first. Electrons have a positive charge because protons have a negative charge, and the name electric field that is being used in western science actually represents a magnetic field. Also, the name magnetic field that is being used in western science actually represents an electric field. It is a major error in western science. Each step in the calculation is derivable. Also, the result of the calculation is compatible with modern science and better than some modern scientific explanations. Also, I could find major errors in scientific explanations. A scientific theory must be correct and fundamental to make it a scientific law. Wrong theories are not scientific.

Ghezero Fika:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  32 parallel planks constant 😹😹 wth are you smoking do you know what planks constant is?? "Buddha observed better than modern scientist" i hate when all this religions people crap on about their ancient philosophy and say it's better than our science when they haven't mentioned what observation they used what deduction/logic, the maths behind they used behind that conclusion, go on and minx words to sound scientific, no religion is scientific, philosophy musn't meddle with science.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Ghezero Fika, The 32 Planck constants were derived using a special calculation. I hope you can understand English.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What is Generosity? The 6 Perfections of Buddhism https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5al4tBKIZv0

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Some big questions about the life and universe have been answered in Theravada Abhidharma. And there is a method to discover the formation of some of them. That calculation is explained and uploaded to the video list. It is about Binary Physics that can be confirmed using Abhidharma.

Alexander Baron:

Could you elaborate a little on what exactly you mean? :)

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Alexander Baron, Abhidhamma explains the process of life/mind and the existence of four ultimate realities. I discovered a way to prove the existence of those formations. It is about the existence of the smallest matter and immaterial realities.

✝️Reverend Dr. Thomas🌱:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  

In your own words, define “REALITY”. ☝️🤔☝️

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @✝️Reverend Dr. Thomas🌱, Time makes the reality from point to point relatively.

✝️Reverend Dr. Thomas🌱:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege , have you ever considered applying for work editing DICTIONARY entries?

If so, I would STRONGLY advise you to reconsider. 😜

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @✝️Reverend Dr. Thomas🌱, It was a simplified answer. My detailed explanation regarding the reality of reality shows the origination of the earliest universe, and it is compatible with the current universe. Also, the reality is scientific. So I would say that you can consider removing the creator God from the Bible and from your imagination.

✝️Reverend Dr. Thomas🌱:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  in fact, it was TAUTOLOGICAL. 🙄

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The birth, life and death of the universe – Public lecture by Dr. Don Lincoln: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Deq5PKVfeo

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Probably, matter converted into energy rays before the Big Bang, and exchanged from one side of the observable universe to the other side. The supreme Buddha explained the expansion and the contraction of the matter of this universe. Space doesn't have a process that can expand matter quickly making cosmic inflation. Space is still increasing. So the Big Bang didn't create space to expand matter. A flat universe doesn't support the concept of Cosmic Inflation from a curved singularity. The Big Bang was not like a breaking of a curved geometry of spacetime. Therefore, the CMB radiation doesn't show that the Big Bang created matter and space breaking the curvature of the so-called singularity. Seemingly, matter came closer to each other on gravitational forces that acted in the flat universe that already existed. So the Big Bang was likely a Big Exchange of matter from one side to another. And there was no need for Cosmic Inflation to expand matter and energy faster than light. A high-density medium reduces the speed of light and it wouldn't allow high-speed expansion related to each element in the medium. The temperature between collisions could be somewhat uniform because of the exchange of energy from one side of the universe to another. Those collisions couldn't happen much closer to each to become one single largest Black Hole because of the large size of the universe and the crossover of gravitons from one side to another. The Buddha mentioned island universes. Everything would come back to a center of gravity in this island universe. Best of luck, and thank you for the explanations. The low-density space should increase, and the low-density of space between galaxies would attract virtual particles in high-density space. The difference between the density of space between matter areas and space areas could reduce the expansion rate of the universe, and it was lower (67.4±0.5 km/s/Mpc) in the observable earliest universe. The observable universe's beginning can't necessarily be a new beginning, and its observable growth doesn't necessarily indicate that it had a new beginning. The high matter densities like the earliest stars and Black Holes could cause extra space to come and fill the low densities in space, increasing the wavelength of light while increasing the expansion rate between matter, and causing the Dark ages in the early universe. 

Daniel Snyder:

I thought we defeated the aether

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Daniel Snyder, Space is material.

Daniel Snyder:

@Suresh Wanayalaege  so what your saying is; the non matter between matter is matter? How ethereal.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

​ @Daniel Snyder, Space contains both matter and antimatter, and they are very small. So space needs space to contain its matter and antimatter. Therefore, the entire space couldn't emerge from a small place, and there was more space than matter from the very beginning. But western theorists/creationists try to say that space was only an emerging medium that expands matter. And they try to say that a lot of space emerged first, and the growth of space reduced later. It is clearly not a scientific explanation. Space is something/material and it can't emerge faster like that. But high-density space would reduce its space while moving its particles into a low-density space, and it wouldn't happen faster than the speed of light.

Daniel Snyder:

@Suresh Wanayalaege  I just figure space is phenomenological through emergence divergence and convergence

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Daniel Snyder, Probably, a Neutrino effect makes Gravity while increasing the density of space near massive objects. General Relativity is only a classical theory, and it doesn't explain the quantum nature of matter and energy. Some creationists try to prove all the solutions to Einstein's equation to prove gravitational singularity in order to prove creationism. White Holes and Gravitational singularities don't exist in reality. Scientists shouldn't use General Relativity to start space and time. The truth is that a lot of space existed before 13.8 billion years.

Daniel Snyder:

@Suresh Wanayalaege  Dirac?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Daniel Snyder, Why Dirac?

Daniel Snyder:

@Suresh Wanayalaege  Dirac made fundamental contributions to the early development of both quantum mechanics and quantum electrodynamics. Among other discoveries, he formulated the Dirac equation which describes the behaviour of fermions and predicted the existence of antimatter. Dirac shared the 1933 Nobel Prize in Physics with Erwin Schrödinger "for the discovery of new productive forms of atomic theory".[11] He also made significant contributions to the reconciliation of general relativity with quantum mechanics.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Daniel Snyder, Yes, he discovered antimatter theoretically. He discovered the opposite charge of electrons. But it doesn't explain the main difference between matter and antimatter. Probably, both matter and antimatter contain the same type of materials, and the only difference is their structure. So it is difficult to say that antimatter particles are completely opposite to matter particles.

Daniel Snyder:

You're deleting your posts and now your changing the subject as if I've said anything about matter antimatter disparity. I pointed to Dirac in regard to your frustration with quantum and relativity.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Daniel Snyder, Special Relativity and General Relativity are different. Quantum Physics uses the theory of special relativity. But it doesn't make General Relativity quantum. Special relativity is related to the speeds of particles, but it is not related to the quantum structure of particles. So it is also not a quantum theory. I didn't delete any posts, and I didn't know why you were talking about antimatter.

Daniel Snyder:

@Suresh Wanayalaege  homie you're a lost cause. "He also made significant contributions to the reconciliation of general relativity with quantum mechanics."

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Daniel Snyder, A real scientific method is better than assumptions and hypotheses. Some creationists try to reconcile general relativity with quantum mechanics using fake arguments to prove creationism. But I'm sure Dr. Dirac didn't do it.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brian Cox - What Was There Before The Big Bang? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BD0r2Xfgh_E

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Inflationary Big Bang is a western big lie.

Dr Satan:

You know this how?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Dr Satan, Space doesn't increase rapidly. And I know how the universe begin because I researched it using a special method.

Dr Satan:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  how do you know that space doesn't increase?

What's your special method? Belief despite the lack of verifiable evidence?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Dr Satan, The universe doesn't grow like a balloon, and it only grows at the edge according to the continuation of time relatively. And then, cyclic processes continue the formations and destructions continuously. the space inside galaxies doesn't grow or expand with Dark Energy. So Dark Energy is not likely a product of existing space. Virtual gravitons (probably, the force that oscillates neutrinos) would increase the space density inside galaxies, attracting virtual particles in space while traveling through them. The low difference between the density of space inside matter areas and space areas could reduce the expansion rate of the universe, and it was lower (67.4±0.5 km/s/Mpc) in the observable earliest universe. The high matter densities like the earliest stars and Black Holes could cause extra space to come and fill the low densities in space, increasing the wavelength of light while increasing the expansion rate between them, and causing the Dark ages in the early universe. According to Abhidhamma, “a rain of energized water (like water sticks, water robs, etc) fills the world (island universe) gradually and stays stably filled for a long time until cosmic air (virtual particles) comes into the filled world (island universe), causing to start the expansion. And then, the world (island universe) stays stably expanded until the contraction.” Virtual particles in space (like air) can come into low-density areas of space (between galaxies) from outside of the island universe until those virtual particles can go there with a maximum speed (up to the speed of light) to distribute virtual particles uniformly between galaxies. The Big Bounce model is the best explanation for the conservation of energy in both matter and space inside an eternally growing universe. So the entropy can sometimes decrease or increase inside some areas of the universe if the number of gravitons increases while increasing the entropy. Also, the particle accelerators make high-energy particles using low-energy particles, showing that entropy is sometimes a byproduct of acceleration (force). So cyclic expansion and contraction of gravitons can increase and reduce entropy in the observable universe. The entire universe started to continue from point to point relatively an uncountable time ago.

Dr Satan:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  actually no. The universe expands everywhere. It's expanding faster at the edges because the expansion is multiplied by distance. Look up the hubble constant. The "edges" of the universe are expanding faster than light because they are the furthers distance away

You clearly don't understand the expansion of the universe. Space expands everywhere. Gravity inside galaxies prevents the stuff inside them from separating but the space it occupies is still expanding. The galaxy just doesn't grow with it as gravity won't let it

Oh okay. You're a nutcase talking about stuff you don't understand who's trying to sound smart

The BGV theorem disproves the big bounce hypothesis and all cyclic universe models

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Dr Satan, Some creationists are misrepresenting the Borde-Guth-Vilenkin Theorem. "The BGV theorem shows that the expansion of the observable Universe has a beginning, not the entirety of the Universe itself."  The interpretation of the growth of space called ‘increasing vacuum energy’ is simply misleading because it can be some extra space that comes faster into the observable universe uniformly. Likely, there was a lot of extra space outside the observable universe. Energy is not something that exists, and energy is an output. So the name vacuum energy is an irrelevant answer because it only mentions the output, ignoring the growth of space (virtual particles). The space (virtual particles) inside galaxies shows that space doesn't make extra space from anything. The observed Hubble Tensions confirm that there is no single Hubble constant. And it proves that the nature of space is not consistent.

Dr Satan:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  The BGV theorem states that even in an inflationary universe, timelike and null geodesics are not past-complete, i.e., you cannot extend those geodesics to negative infinity within the spacetime itself. In essence and layman terms, this means that at some point you have to impose initial conditions on your spacetime or have your assumptions break down, e.g., by having the inflationary universe created through some sort of nucleation event in a larger spacetime.

It proves time does not extend infinitely into the past

Suresh Wanayalaege:

​ @Dr Satan, The entire universe had a start. But it doesn't mean that it had an infinite density and it started to expand like a balloon. It could start from a point, and it could expand from point to point. Therefore, the edge of the entire universe would expand forever. As I told you before I can explain it very well using a special method. The eternal growth of the universe could start an uncountable time ago. We only observe some parts of cyclic continuations in the observable universe.

Dr Satan:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  so you accept that the BGV theorem disproves the big bounce. Good

You do realize that infinite can just mean immeasurable, right? It was immeasurably dense 

Balloons can expand just like your point to point example

You said "therefore the edge of the entire universe would expand forever" yet the argument you provided for that in no way implies that it will expand forever

What is this "special method" and and why are you so afraid of explaining it? Who else has tried your "special method" that you have repeatedly failed to explain. Please cite some scientific articles published to accredited science journals which pertain to the results of your special method

Dr Satan:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  oh and it didn't start an uncountable time ago. It started roughly 13.8 billion years ago 

What "cyclic continuations" do we observe?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

​ @Dr Satan, I said the BGV theorem is not enough to explain the process in the entire universe because the entire universe is filled with groups and subgroups of matter like solar systems, galaxies, and groups of galaxies. So possibly, the entire universe could split into many small universes. Real mathematics starts from zero, but some creationists try to say that the universe started with strange mathematics that instantly jump from nothingness to a point with an infinitely huge density. And they don't explain any reason for the growth of space after the formation of the infinite density. A balloon expands somewhat uniformly when air comes into it. So space would come from outside of it, and it doesn't make extra matter. But the expansion/growth of the edge could make both early space and matter. We observe only a small part of the universe that undergoes a part of its cyclic process. But we can't easily observe the entire cyclic process in our region because of some limits. Time could make a lot of points of emptinesses relatively. And Binary Physics like that is more relative to reality than emerged physics. Some people don't want to know or fear accepting some truths because of religious or political reasons. And sometimes logic and mathematics don't work with creationists. Just try to be open-minded.

Dr Satan:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  the bgv theorem doesn't explain any process. It only proves time didn't extend infinitely backwards and thus disproves the cyclic universe hypotheses. Nothing that you said about galaxies, solar systems is relevant to the bgv theorem whatsoever 

We don't know that there ever was nothing. All we do know is there was a singularity 

How would expanding space edges make space? How would it make matter?

Time is space 

You're a lying charlatan. I am open minded but I know what I'm talking about and you are talking complete nonsense

Suresh Wanayalaege:

​ @Dr Satan, The observable universe is not the entire universe as same as the nearest galaxy is not the only galaxy. And some theories only relate to the frame of reference. We can't say that space is not expanding somehow just because the galaxy we are living in is not expanding. But it doesn't mean that space is actually expanding. High-density space from somewhere could come into low-density space if quantum gravity supported it. Time existed before space, and that is why anything starts and continues. The edge of the entire universe could continue growing the universe because of the relativeness between each new point at the edge. And that relativeness could make some constants relatively.

Dr Satan:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  I'm well aware the observable universe isnt the whole universe and that is completely irrelevant to the topic at hand, that you felt like bringing that up for no reason at all is more evidence that you're a lying charlatan 

Name two theories which "only relate to the frame of reference".

You're a brainless simpleton. Space is what's expanding. Galaxies don't expand because gravity stops them from doing so but the space they occupy still expands

Quantum gravity isn't proven so you have no basis upon which to claim it can support anything 

Time is space. That's why it's called the spacetime continum...

This nonsensical spew of scientific terms may impress your low IQ, uneducated friends but it's not impressing me

Suresh Wanayalaege:

​ @Dr Satan, Quantum gravity is not something that wants to be proven. It is something that wants to be discovered. And I already explained it to you. General Relativity is only a geometric theory, and it doesn't explain how mass makes gravity. So gravity could originate from an effect of some quantum particles that travel from high-density to low-density space. Some quantum forces could increase the density of space around a massive object. Space doesn't bend in reality. The reference frames between General Relativity and quantum theories are not relative to each other. Likely, High-Density space and Dark/Hidden Matter (parallel matter) exist around massive objects. Infinite nothingness could be the infinite negative time in the completely nothing universe. And that moment of nothingness could be both infinitely large and infinitely small because it could not be relative to anything. And then, time could continue to the positive time from point to point because a small point of nothingness doesn't have a permanent location if time continues. Just calm down. The educational level is not enough to insult others personally, and I usually don't care about the insults of creationists. However, I was patiently waiting till you give up this conversation. So, I'm thankful to you if you did it. Bye.

Dr Satan:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  you have discovered quantum gravity when absolutely no scientist alive has? Not likely lol

As it hasn't been quantified you have no basis to claim it can do anything 

General relativity explains how mass interacts with the gravitational quantum field we also call space and that explains the phenomenon we observe as gravity. So that's an outright lie 

Space isn't a material so it can't be high density or low density

Space does bend 🤦‍♂️. Explain time dilations without the curvature of space as the result of gravity lol 

Which quantum theories?

Nothing doesn't exist so to say it can be infinite is just plain dumb

Nothing cant be large or small because only things can be large or small. Nothing doesn't exist

Stop talking about nothing as though it has properties 🤦‍♂️

I am calm. You can calmly insult someone and you should when they're lying 

I'm not a creationist lol

Suresh Wanayalaege:

​ @Dr Satan, The universe was a thing even if it was infinitely nothing in the beginning, and that nothingness could increase with time from point to point continuously. Completely nothingness of a thing is infinitely large and infinitely small because it is not relative. Infinity is infinite if it is not relative. Space doesn't behave like rubber bands because space is filled with matter and antimatter particles that appear and disappear. Quantum particles or dry sand don't bend because they are not connected to each other tightly. And it requires a consistent force to keep them connected to each other if they repel each other and try to move away from an object. Quantum field theory doesn't explain the formation of Black Holes. But according to General Relativity, a very high-energy particle could become a very small Black Hole. Perhaps, some theorists who support creationists try to hide the real quantum nature of gravity because they try to use a wrong solution of the theory of General Relativity to theorize a universal singularity. Bye.

Dr Satan:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  you're a simpleton lol. Something can't be something and nothing at the same time. That would violate the law of noncontradiction 🤦‍♂️

Everything you've said is wrong

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Dr Satan, Nothingness grows with time. And time is something that continues and makes relative points of nothingness (negative and positive emptinesses). Bye. Don't waste my time because I'm busy.

Dr Satan:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  how does nothing grow with time?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Dr Satan, It is possible, and I have explained it in detail using a special method. But I don't want to discuss it with you. Have a nice day and best of luck. Maybe I'll not reply again to you because I'm very busy and there are a lot of details to explain. So, Bye for a few days or weeks.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Special Relativity: This Is Why You Misunderstand It

James Duncan:

Sabine's videos contain the most accurate and concise summations of these kinds of topics and I absolutely love it ❤️

Suresh Wanayalaege:

She is Superb. However, special relativity wouldn’t change absolute time. The so-called relative time is likely an illusion created by relative interactions. The concept of relative time is most likely a wrong interpretation that doesn't represent the fundamental interactions because the fundamental moment of time would pass relative to its previous moment. And the fundamental time is not relative to speed. It is not only a theoretical illusion that is related to special relativity. The high-energy muon particles that travel faster than their usual speed showed that they can travel long distances without decaying quickly. Some observations like that probably show an illusion. The higher speeds would reduce the decaying process of fundamental waves (elementary particles) because of high-energy quantum jumps or something like that, but it doesn't mean that they didn't experience time. The wavelength of light (photon) waves increases while traveling long distances, and therefore their energy reduces while traveling. The reason to reduce their wavelength is not the important thing. And their structural change clearly shows that they experienced time. Perhaps, the real problem is not relative to special relativity. Stable wave symmetries of wave particles would reduce the speed of their decaying process. The low-energy muon waves would have a large wave amplitude with a large wavelength that can make the muon wave symmetry unstable, causing it to decay faster. But if the high-energy muon waves have a smaller wavelength with a smaller wave amplitude relative to the low-energy muon, their wave symmetry would be stable, causing them to decay slowly. Electron waves would stay stable because they relatively have very low energy levels and are likely related to protons. The gravitational time dilation likely depends on the density (disturbance) in the medium because the pressure in the medium can reduce the speed of travel. Therefore, it is related to the speed-dilation in higher density. Presumably, the real reason for some people to reject the existence of absolute time is related to the influence of their religious background. Theorists should be responsible more.

PretTyFish:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  Please refer to the "Proper time" section of the video. Everything experiences time. It's just that everything experiences time differently depending on the velocity relative to each other, hence the relative time. It would be meaningless to find an "absolute time" if everything only evolves in its own time, which is relative to whatever the "absolute time" may be.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @PretTyFish, Elementary particles can't decide the absolute time because they emerged from quantum fields. Quantum fields would obey absolute time.

PretTyFish:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  That is not true either. Quantum field theory is literally developed to be compatible with the special relativity, which of course discards the notion of absolute time. And again, as I commented in my last comment, such "absolute time" would be meaningless if it does not introduce any new physics, which means that the proper time of everything is still the only time that matters and the introduction of the "absolute time" is redundant.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @PretTyFish, According to my theory of everything, the universe is based on absolute time, and absolute time is fundamental. Nothingness grows with time. And time is something fundamental that continues and makes relative points of nothingness (negative and positive emptinesses). Relative time emerged from relative interactions between points of absolute time.

PretTyFish:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  Well, if you claim so. Good luck publishing your theory and making predictions/calculations that are compatible with the current results. (I had a look at your channel, but Sinhala is not my specialty so I would not understand it)

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @PretTyFish, OK. Thank you. It is not much popular yet. But I have uploaded published and updated English versions of it to a social platform. Have a great time.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Course Introductory video of Abhidhamma (Pali)

What If Nalanda Was Not Destroyed ? || PART-2

The Supreme Buddha Explained The Origin Of The Observable Universe

Delson Armstrong PtII Dependent Origination Intellectual Content of Enlightenment & Core of Buddhism

Suresh Wanayalaege:
Abhidhamma is the most intellectual and scientific teaching in Buddhism, and its commentaries are profound too.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Klee Irwin - Are We Living In A Simulation? - Part 5 - The Self-Simulation Hypothesis

Suresh Wanayalaege:
A wonderful explanation. The Paramartha (Ultimate) Dhamma (Realities) process the reality. The supreme Buddha explained it suberbly.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Buddhism & Science | Vaishali Gaidhani | Week 13 | Dhamma USA

Something Strange Happened Before THE BIG BANG

Suresh Wanayalaege:
Space contains both matter and antimatter particles that appear and disappear. Therefore, high-density space could come into low-density regions of space because of the higher density of space around massive objects. And that could cause changing the wavelength of light, making the dark ages of the universe. It would be the real reason for the cosmic expansion.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

doSenprsto5u8hia4um39m451f8uif38tah77fclc7h08glclc004u6ifi3f  · 

Enemies of God and critics of The Bible that they've never read often present a long list of alleged errors and contradictions. They do it because they need excuses to disbelieve, so they attack The Bible thinking that we need the Bible to believe in God.

Christians often respond to critics but many critics find excuses to dismiss what they are saying by claiming that Christians write long responses and that Christians "make excuses" when that claim in of itself is an excuse to dismiss the Christian response without anything to disprove their response with, usually just assertions and fallacious claims.

Suresh Ran Rahas

Russell E. Gmirkin composed his research about the origin of the Hebrew Bible, and the name of it is Plato And The Creation of the Hebrew Bible. He claims that the Pentateuch (the Torah) utilized the works of Plato's dialogues. Also, Jesus didn't die on the cross, and the Roman empire made the Christian Bible.

• Like
• Reply
• 3h

• Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas What proof does Russell E. gmirkin have?

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 2h
• Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas Please list Plato's dialogues so we can compare to Scripture and please explain how Scripture was opposed to Platonism while you claim ignorantly otherwise.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 2h
• Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas Provide proof that Jesus didn't die on the cross.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 2h
• Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas Explain how the Roman empire made the Christian Bible when the Roman empire was pagan and how that could be the case when The Bible pre-existed the Roman empire 

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 2h
• Active

  Suresh Ran Rahas

  Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh, Bible was assembled by St. Jerome around A.D. 400 (Wiki Page: First_Council_of_Nicaea). Christ risen from the dead" - 1 Corinthians 15.20. But the resurrection of jesus is mentioned in the letters called Epistle to the Romans (Wiki Page: Epistle_to_the_Romans). According to the New Testament narrative, the ascension occurred 40 days after the resurrection. Apocalypse of peter, gospal of peter, Gospel of Thomas, and Gospel of Phillips mention that Jesus didn't die on the cross (National Geographic Documentary - Secret Lives Of Jesus - BBC Secret Documentary - (34th minute)).

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 49m
• Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas Bible existed before Jerome. Can you explain your ignorance?

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 47m
• Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas Sources older than the ones you appealed to say he died on the cross, why would I believe a younger source over an older one? 

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 47m
• Active

  Suresh Ran Rahas

  Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh, Mary's uncle (Joseph) and the Romans wanted to save Jesus from Jewish priests. A BBC documentary shows that Jesus was a Buddhist Monk. And he didn't die on the cross. According to some evidence, Jesus lived in Asia with the name Yuz Asaf (meaning “Leader of the Healed”/"Son of Joseph"). Perhaps, that is why Islam rejects that Jesus was the son of God. Someone gave a drink to Jesus before he died (maybe to make him look dead.). Usually, people take a long time to die on a Cross, But Jesus (a powerful person) died in 6 or 9 hours. So it is funny. Joseph of Arimathea arranged a special place to keep the dead body of Jesus. It seems that Jesus didn't die on the cross. Because Jesus appeared to many people around 200 to 500 times while he was leaving Israel. You can't find any detail about Jesus from the age of 13 to 30. So maybe he traveled to Asia, and then he could practice meditation as a Buddhist monk, which gave him some supernatural powers. However, the other proofs showed that he returned to Kashmir (Jesus in Ahmadiyya Islam). Romans almost didn't want to kill Jesus, but some Jews wanted to kill Jesus. Joseph of Arimathea was a rich man, and maybe he tried to protect Jesus with the help of the Romans. So Jesus could live in middle-east: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FsN4zE2yilo (Jesus lived in Kashmir)

  

  YOUTUBE.COM

  Jesus was a Buddhist Monk BBC Documentary

  Jesus was a Buddhist Monk BBC Documentary

  

  • Like
  • Reply
  • Remove Preview
  • 42m
• Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas People always make excuses to disbelieve. If Jesus was a Buddhist why didn't he teach Buddhism? 

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 37m
• Active

  Suresh Ran Rahas

  Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh, Romans didn't know Buddhism well. Romans tried to connect Jesus's teachings to Judaism. But Jews rejected it.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 34m
• Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas Stupid people will say ANYTHING 

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 33m
• Active

  Suresh Ran Rahas

  Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh, Jesus didn't want to establish a religion called Christianity.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 29m
• Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas No he didn't. He wanted us to know God and get to God through him. The Life and teachings of Jesus is called Christianity. How is that Buddhism? 

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 27m
• Active

  Suresh Ran Rahas

  Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh, Perhaps, Jesus also wanted reform Judaism with new concepts.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 26m
• Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas Yes he did. He formed a New Convenant ignoramus.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 25m
• Active

  Suresh Ran Rahas

  Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh, I don't think that Jesus was a Buddhist. Perhaps, he was a believer like Hindus. Some Buddhists worship some Gods too.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 24m

• Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas I think you are full of doo Doo and you will say anything without proof simply to dismiss Jesus Christ.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 6d

Suresh Ran Rahas

Jesus couldn't save himself from the political power of the Jews. Some teachings in Judaism are harmful to humanity. The Roman empire composed the Christain Bible, and they could make it better than the Hebrew Bible. But likely, they wanted to use slavery, and they couldn't reject it using the Christian Bible. And likely, they didn't want to protect animal rights because of their requirements. So the Christian bible was likely a political requirement. And they could use it to dehumanize non-Christians because they didn't care whether using violence is good or bad to convert atheists and polytheists because they think non-believers definitely receive eternal punishment in hell. Also, some believers didn't allow others to convert to another religion. Some politicians use the ignorance of people to increase their political powers, and they don't care about the truth. And sometimes they try to hide the truth.

• Like
• Reply
• 3h

• Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas Jesus sacrificed himself. He wasn't trying to save himself ignoramus.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 2h
• Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas Romans had slavery without the Bible. It was The Bible that ended slavery. Ignorant atheizoid.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 2h
• Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas Stupid people say stupid things about things they didn't research or study. I laugh at your desperate attempt to dismiss The Bible.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 2h
• Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas Jesus Christ is The Truth.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 2h
• Active

  Suresh Ran Rahas

  Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh, Plato And The Creation of the Hebrew Bible https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2CYpOFQrrQ (Russell E. Gmirkin)

  

  YOUTUBE.COM

  Plato And The Creation of the Hebrew Bible - Russell E. Gmirkin

  Plato And The Creation of the Hebrew Bible - Russell E. Gmirkin

  • Like
  • Reply
  • Remove Preview
  • 47m
• Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas Suresh Ran Rahas Please list Plato's dialogues so we can compare to Scripture and please explain how Scripture was opposed to Platonism while you claim ignorantly otherwise.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 34m
• Active

  Suresh Ran Rahas

  Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh, It you watch the video, then you will be able to find details. And you can try to study his book too.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 31m
• Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas I want proof and evidence. I spit on confirmation bias.

  Suresh Ran Rahas Please list Plato's dialogues so we can compare to Scripture and please explain how Scripture was opposed to Platonism while you claim ignorantly otherwise.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 31m
• Active

  Suresh Ran Rahas

  Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh, Plato suggested making a doctrine to control people in their Kindowm. Also, the stories about Adam and Eve, and Moses were added to the Hebrew Bible later. Some stories were taken from other cultures too.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 14m

• Active

  Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas How wonderful if Christianity could control people!

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 9h
• Active

  Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas Plato was a pagan Greek, the Old Testament stories were from the Jews. My friend, you are DESPERATE 

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 9h
• Active

  Suresh Ran Rahas

  Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh, Plato's dialogs influenced for making the Hebrew Bible. You can study more about it online.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 3
• 
  
• Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas Well, cite the sources.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 1h
• Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas and where does Christianity teach that long rant?

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 1h
• Active

  Suresh Ran Rahas

  Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh, You can find citations from the author. I'm not the author.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 12m
• Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas Is the author a primary source?

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 10m
• Active

  Suresh Ran Rahas

  Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh, No. I don't have time to find more details. If you want more details you can try to find it yourself. I didn't write that book.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 7m
• Active

  Suresh Ran Rahas

  Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh, You can ask the same questions about the authors of the Bible.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 4m

• Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas I can and they are.

  Is the author a primary source?

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 5d
• Active

  Suresh Ran Rahas

  Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh, The author provides evidence in his book.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 5d

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Does Secular Buddhism Exist? | Ajahn Brahmāli

The Ancient Wisdom: Part 5 with Pablo Sender | At Home with Theosophy Series

The Three Refuges, with Bhante Suddhaso

Suresh Wanayalaege:
🙏🙏🙏. The noble eightfold path is related to 8 good emotional qualities that should be applied to the mind moment simultaneously to attain enlightenment. Thank you so much.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Moment before death, with Ayya Soma

Suresh Wanayalaege:
Fully enlightened people(Arhats) are amazing. 🙏🙏🙏💛🙏🙏🙏

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Abhidhamma & Buddhist Practice | Dr. Beth Jacobs | Lecture 21

Suresh Wanayalaege:
There are four continents where Humans live according to Buddhist cosmology. Likely, some Humans live in the animal realm/plane. I guess, there are Humans in Pretha and Asura realms too. Abhidhamma is a single discourse, and the Buddha taught it to his mother and other beings in Trāyastriṃśa heaven for three months while going to the upper (Uttar) continent called Uttarakuru to receive meals from humans to partake meals. Uttarakuru continent is closer to heaven, but according to the texts “When it is midday in Aparagodānīya, the sun is setting in Jambudvīpa and rising in Uttarakuru, while it is midnight in Pūrvavideha.” If some modern humans who live in Jambūddhīpa (the lowest continent) are capable and intelligent enough to understand those teachings, then I think that they should know the existence of those teachings whether they like to study them or not. May Triple Gems Bless You.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Your Pseudogenes DISPROVE God #shorts

दैनिक जीवन में अभिधम्म / Abhidhamma in daily Life / Bhikkhuni sakya Dhammadinna #dhamma #buddhism

15 Signs Someone is Fake Smart

The Jehovah's Witness Matrix

01. Introduction & Two kinds of Truths / Reality

Pakistan bans Wikipedia

Breakthrough In Dark Energy? Here's What The Researchers Have To Say

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Dark Energy is extra space. Galaxies expand into space and space comes between them to balance the density of space between galaxies. And it shows that we are living in an island universe. It is the real reason for cosmic expansion for sure.

Brandon Hanson:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  I don't think so,

Suresh Wanayalaege:

​ @Brandon Hanson, It is the truth. Hubble Constant is not a single Constant. Space is moving at different speeds. Some scientists/creationists try to ignore that extra space exists beyond the observable universe. The Big Bang theory is misleading. The church still exists behind the western scientific community.

jaz:

This is literally a made up conclusion to publish anything.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Dark Origins of the Scientific Method

Did Allah DECEIVE all ex-Muslims and Apostates?? 👀👺🔥

Islam sanctions Marital R*pe?!

02. The 4 Ultimate Realities and Citta

03. Cittas according to planes & lobhamūla citta

What is the law of karma? | Ajahn Jayasaro

Suresh Wanayalaege:

The mind collects and makes information very faster, and makes the resultants called Karma Vipaka. Thank you so much.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

04. Dosamūla Citta, Mohamūla Citta & Mental process in brief

Sigiriya - Ancient Sky City Built With Advanced Technology

Suresh Wanayalaege:

The war between Rama and Ravana is most probably a myth created by South Indian Hindus to make the history of India. Rama was Gauthum Bodhisatwa, and Sita was his sister according to the Buddhist Jataka tale. South Indians could easily know about the islands (Bridge) between early Sri Lanka and India, and they could name it Rama Setu (Rama Bridge) with their new story about Rama and Ravana. Most likely, the Valmiki's Ramayana texts were developed later with the development of modern Hinduism. Ravana is not available in the original story. But it doesn't mean that someone called Ravana didn't exist in Lanka. Hinduism is a mixture of many stories and cultures. The existing Sanskrit texts are not older than Buddhism. Some Hindus likely have tried to merge Buddhism with Hinduism. Rama-paṇḍita was a Bodhisattva (a previous life of the Buddha), but Hindu Rāma was an Avatars of Vishnu. Avatars appear in post-Vedic literature & included Rāvaṇa while changing 'Sītā' from sister to wife of Rāma. And the Buddhist tale didn't mention Lanka, Hanuman, Ravan, and a war with Rama. Most likely, modern Hinduism was developed in south India after the invasion of the south Indian Kalinga Kindom by the north Indian King Ashok.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Dhamma uploaded: Is it correct that Buddhism teaches us to give up all desires?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Truth About Buddhism! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FWEAQwQNI1s

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Buddhism is extremely scientific, and I could prove it using a special equation. The supreme Buddha mentioned a lot of things about the origin of the mind and matter. And I have uploaded videos explaining them.

Brendan:

Buddha/ Gautama received enlightenment under a tree from a serpent and Budda believed the dragon is the only way to true englightement this is All from Satan himself

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Brendan, The Hebrew bible, and most religious scripts developed after 500 BCE. Hinduism and Abrahamic religions contradict each other a lot, and those texts are just political rules and beliefs.

Brendan:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  500 BCE well for one that is wrong you obviously have not researched but let me ask you this if there is No God who has no beginning and no end you believe in nothing because that is the only two choices you have and if you don't believe that give me a Third choice

Suresh Wanayalaege:

​ @Brendan, The research of it is called Plato and the creation of the Hebrew Bible. And I did research about the formation of the universe. It is in the video list. Points of spacetime could grow with time.

Brendan:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  time space matter All came into existence by themselves so you believe in Nothing? Only two choices God Almighty or Nothing everyone has to have faith in something even though your faith is in nothing nobody gets to have no faith you need to believe in God or Nothing FACTS no way around it

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Brendan, Some people say that time didn't exist before space. It is only their opinion. Time could make everything relatively from point to point, making relative time and relative distance. It is a research I did recently and confirmed it using the science in Buddhism. So I have no doubts about it.

Brendan:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  I don't care about some people or your emotions either God always existed had no beginning and has no end or this is other option that everything came into existence from Nothing so you believe and have faith in Nothing and Budda received enlightenment from a serpent/ Lucifer under a tree as I said every person needs to have faith in either God or Nothing you still can't show me another option because there isn't

Brendan:

Suresh Wanayalaege I've researched buddishm, Hinduism and many more eastern religions and believes you don't believe in Almighty God but in the same hand pray to hundreds of spirits basically you are praying to demon's if don't believe in Almighty God Why pray to spirits because your logic say's we all came from nothing you are part of the occult satanism witchcraft this conversation is over Jesus Christ is God

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Brendan, The Buddha explained how the observable universe expands and contracts within a Great Aeon called a Maha Kalpa. And he explained how the smallest matter makes large and larger matter. Also, he explained how the mind moves in the smallest matter. The mind is faster than you think, and that is why the mind continues after death. You have to study the deepest teachings in Buddhism to understand Buddhism well. It is difficult to reject those teachings because those teachings are highly technical. And there are a lot of things in Buddhism that we can learn, and I learn about Buddhism since I was around 11 years old. Before that, I was following the Roman Catholic religion and I went to Catholic schools only. You can live with your imagination if you like. Bye.

Brendan:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege you believe in Nothing and that is a Fact and this is isn't me attacking you personally as I said before either Almighty God had no beginning and has no end or You believe in Nothing because that is your two choices everyone has faith even atheist like yourself have a faith also Why do you pray to hundreds of spirits who are gods but in the same time don't believe in Almighty God it's called double talking

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Brendan, The gods in Buddhism are just better living beings in heavenly worlds. Personally, I don't ask for help from them. If you are not afraid of your imaginary and unscientific Almighty God, then you can take a look at the research I did about the origin of the entire universe. The name of it is Binary Mathematical Physics and Buddhism. If you think that time is not real, then you can't understand how time could grow the universe, making points of spacetime relatively. Some people try to change or hide the truth to fit their faith. And some people believe them and insult others who don't believe them. And sometimes, they used weapons and made rules to make people believe them. You shouldn't think that we should believe your beliefs. Buddhism is a very peaceful religion. Usually, bad people have reasons to insult good people. And sometimes, we can't easily change bad people because sometimes their reasons are religious reasons or strong wrong views. Therefore, we have to ignore those people. Bye.

Brendan:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  you pray to dead spirit's and You are a atheist contracting yourself when you die and we all die you will stand before Almighty God for your Sins and I know buddisht make merit for there Sins but Why would you do that because who are you making merit to and what for because you don't believe in God you are completely using circular reasoning

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Brendan, Don't worry about me. If you think that you have a mind, then try to investigate more about it, without thinking that you don't want to know about it. Try to develop your mind within this life, and enjoy the benefit within this life. Don't live like a robot because of your beliefs about the next life.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Artificial Intelligence (Chat-GPT) and Buddhist Non-Self: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hp0zpOYkqMI

Suresh Wanayalaege:

The people in cartoons can't see anything. And electric machines don't use a good medium like blood to allow a mind to connect and influence materials. Therefore, the mind called Citta (in Pali) is different from Artificial Intelligence. Citta is a moment of receiving and making data and actions faster than anything else.

Doug's Dharma:

Maybe so! If it were able to really learn and change from experience then it would fast become unique. We will see where things go ... 🙏

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Doug's Dharma, The mind/Citta is only a moment of making a mind element called Vingnana Dathu while making a feeling, recognition, concentration, action, life faculty, mental advertence, and a lot of processes and functions like that simultaneously. But an electric machine works using algorithms of software that usually do those processes and functions separately. Therefore, it doesn't have a single and continuous mind. 🙏

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Can we make ultimate moral judgements? | Tommy J. Curry, Joanna Kavenna, Massimo Pigliucci

Suresh Wanayalaege:

If a Buddhist monk accepts that killing a bad human is fine, then that Buddhist monk loses his monkhood if that person died. According to Buddhism, Buddhists shouldn't harm living beings, causing them regret.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Se7en Stages of Defense at Sigiriya, Sri Lanka - Part I

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Council of Ex-Muslims of Sri Lanka

1h  · 

Suresh Ran Rahas

Jesus was in a superposition of both dead and alive at the same time according to the Bible. He was like the cat in Schrödinger's thought experiment.

• Like
• Reply
• 7m

Ex-Muslims of North America

nSpdsetoorA24c3asY8: ye3mglita1t0 10778mag0aa3Mcuautdeh2 i4r  · 

Has Jesus Risen?
Saint Schrodinger, the forgotten disciple #EasterSunday

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

21h  · 

Cults that attack Christianity, ironically, borrow a lot from Christianity, even atheists.

Suresh Ran Rahas

The concept called Creator God is not scientific. Buddhism is scientific and explains almost everything about the mind. Also, there are explanations about the material forms too. Jesus was in a superposition of both dead and alive at the same time according to the Bible. He was like the cat in Schrödinger's thought experiment. Jesus didn't die on the cross, and the Roman Catholic religion was developed by the Roman Empire. The Hebrew Bible was created with the influence of Plato's dialogs. So don't waste your valuable human life with fairy tales. According to Buddhism, the animal world and the other bad worlds are the home of most living beings.

4

• Like
• Reply
• 21h

Hide 15 Replies

• Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh

  Suresh Ran Rahas Jesus was loyal and died for his family and friends, Buddah left his wife and children to follow his own desires. Buddah died and evaporated without solving the problem of suffering. Jesus died and resurrected and ends our suffering. Enough said!

  

  3

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 20h
  • Edited
• Alperovich Anatoly

  Suresh Ran Rahas the creator is a scientific fact . Do you believe “everything was created 13.7 billions cosmic years ago, buy the image of a Bozon of Higgs ? Then your creator is the Bozon of Higgs

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 16h
• Active

  Suresh Ran Rahas

  Shaykh Sérgio Terra Pbuh, According to Buddhism, there are 3 main mental qualities called Greed, Anger, Delusion that technically cause problems. But Karma is a result of 4 main thinking patterns. (Artat/Enlightened people don't think like that) 1) Taking impermanenant things as permanent. 2) Taking suffering as happiness. 3.) Taking non-self as self 4.) Taking bad things as good.

  Abhidhamma teachings in Buddhism explain how the mind processes good and bad Karma. There is a fundamental process in the mind called Citta Series/Vithi that receive information within a mind moment and processes our actions within a few mind moments. But the actions of enlightened people are don't make good and bad Karma. Their actions are just actions. But they have to face the results of their previous Karma until their last death. According to the teachings on Paramartha Dhamma (Ultimate Realities), the mind/Citta observes purposes during all the mind/Citta moments. And the Nibbana Dhatu (the element that ceases/disappears or blows out) is an ultimate reality/moment that causes stopping the mind/Citta. Most likely, the Nibbana Dhatu is similar to the 17th mind moment related to the smallest material zones that disappear after the 16th mind moment of its existence, because the 17 mind moment is likely a gap between the death and rebirth of the smallest matter zone. According to early Buddhist commentaries, a material zone disappears before the end of its cyclic lifetime. So the 17 mind moments in it would have a somewhat disappeared mind moment. According to Buddhism, the fully enlightened (Arhat) lay people die within 7 days. So likely, they don't have a purpose to live unless they become Buddhist monks to teach Buddhism. Therefore, a purposeless and unattached mind would go through that Nibbana mindless moment letting it stop the continuation of the mind.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 16h
• Active

  Suresh Ran Rahas

  Alperovich Anatoly, The Big Bang theory is not a proven theory, and it is entirely based on assumptions. Also, the Big Bang theory is wrong because it is not scientific. Creationism is not science. Buddhist Abhidhamma explains the process of Mental factors, Many worlds, Mental states (Jhana), Rebirth, the status of the mind, etc. The mind moments continue as 3 moments. And a stream of mind (Pali: Chitta Vithi) has a maximum of 17 mind moments. And during that process, the mind continues as many rebirths every 3 moments, and also every 17 mind moments conditionally. The normal death is a conditional death, and it can continue to the next 17 mind moments of the conditioned life until the mind moment stops continuing as a result of that 17 conditioned mind moments. If we know Abhidhamma well we can explain the other (Sutta) teachings of the Buddha easily without misunderstandings and struggles.

  The mind is not a permanent soul but a process like a soul that continues with the five aggregates of clinging. There are no fixed five aggregates in the mind to be destroyed. The mind is a stream of continuation in Matter (Rupa) and immaterial (Nama) elements. The mind doesn't need to carry Matter or Nama with it to make another birth. The Buddha said that it takes only a minimal amount of time (the time it takes for a strong person to make his hand straight) to move to another body. So perhaps, after death, a normal mind travels less than the speed of light to be attached to another body. But if the mind is based on quantum processes, then the mind can get information about the previous birth using very fast quantum interactions like quantum entanglements, quantum tunneling, etc. According to Abhidhamma, there is a Rupa (particle) called Life Faculty (Jivithaidriya) which is almost similar to the Higgs particles in quantum physics. So the Matter (Rupa) density in space can help the mind to travel while causing it to continue the five aggregates. Maybe, if we can disconnect our mind moment from the mass/matter (Rupa), then we would not have a rebirth. However, Abhidhamma explains a quantum process between sets of elements. If we can understand those explanations clearly, then we can understand the logical science of rebirth too.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 16h
• Alperovich Anatoly

  Suresh Ran Rahas so what is newin that ? We know it for 4500 years at least. It all is coded in Torah.

  The Big Bang theory is “disproven hypothesis “ , as it was shown , by latest mathematical model. That there are “ sheets on the wing” theory now. There are parallel universes ( dimensions) , that move back and fourth , and are not plane. Thus when come closer ( like two magnets) they crush into each others fields , with the extreme points, and then the big bang happens . We live between the big bangs.

  I am a Destructor and the Creator of the worlds. Care for mathematical model and explanation of multi dimensional? Made by two scientific jews? Do you have a guess, why seventy percents of Novel Prize laureates are jews ? Though they are mostly from Christian countries ?

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 16h
• Alperovich Anatoly

  Suresh Ran Rahas i study buddhism. And daoism. Practice Zen. Now also hinduism. No problem for us. Talmud from Babylon , one of my blood line wiseman had explained . Still four generations before Siddhartha Buddha . That it is important To learn the wisdom of far east and india, cause these cultures “ advanced tremendously in studying the secrets of the world ( universe ) . Just dont look for the reason. So i started to learn and compare . And proved to myself , my ancestor was right. It is important to learn. Cause the history of imperialism is different in east asia and the peninsula .

  So, do you look for the reason?

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 16h
• Jon Shu

  Suresh Ran Rahas Buddhism is not scientific, in today's sense - it doesn't strictly adhere to the scientific method, no. While the 17 javanas of abhidhamma, your mind moments, are carefully explained, proof is pretty difficult. Repeatability of any experiment is also in question. There is also no way to prove anything to an external observer, objectively, since you have to directly experience it yourself to know it. This makes it subjective.

  So, subjective, non-repeatable, and the experiments don't actually have any failure conditions - a proper scientific theory sets out what conditions would disprove the theory...

  Add to this that not all Buddhist lineages accept all sutras, all teachings, as equally valid. Buddhism is right on a great many things, but at the end of the day, when Buddha was asked what happened after death, he refused to answer the question. For good reason?

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 1h
• Active

  Suresh Ran Rahas

  Jon Shu, The concept of God itself it unscinetific. Original Buddhism is Theravada Buddhism. Buddhism is extremely scientific, and the Abhidhamma teachings are the most scientific teachings of Buddhism. I could mathematically derive the fundamental elements mentioned in Abhidhamma. Those explanations about realities are scientific because they are correct. Wrong science is a belief even if people think that it is scientific. Nature is scientific whether you can explain it scientifically or not. Buddhism teaches about the smallest matter zones, smallest time, smallest mind moment, and thought processing process. Quantum physics teaches about the smallest time called Planck time. Abhidhamma mentions about 28 material elements and 52 immaterial paramount emotions. And there are hidden dimensions and worlds according to some modern scientific explanations and my theory (Verifying The Origin Of Everything). The Buddha said that this great universe which has a thousand billion Sakwala (Galaxies) undergoes a cyclic process within a duration called a Maha-Kalpa. The Buddha explained a lot of things about the process of the universe. And we can find those teachings in the Higher (Abhi) Doctrine (Dhamma) in Theravada tradition.

  Thanking God, Asking for forgivness, and Believing god to go to heaven is absolutely not scientific.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 1h
• Jon Shu

  Suresh Ran Rahas I never said believing in God is scientific, either. I've already explained a great deal about Buddhism to this guy, and he's not all that interested. But to be completely fair, what I said is true - the abhidarma does not meet the requirements of what, today, we call the scientific method.

  I actually tend to agree with practically everything in the abhidarma, but that's due to experiential factors, not some external scientific verification. One place where buddhism seems to have gotten it wrong is in the kalpa idea, roughly analogous to the cyclic model of the universe in contrast to the big-bang.

  The proof that the universe had a beginning puts all that to rest. There is no 'begingless time,' if the universe had a beginning. The idea of dependent arising works perfectly, for us, and our envirionment - nobody has ever observed an uncaused cause. That does not mean that one does not exists, tho - you can't use logic to extrapolate OUTSIDE the temporal box we live in, so to speak. But I'm not going to bother to get into a big scientific debate on facebook, especially when books and articles are easy to find on your own if you actually are willing to invest the time, which it sounds like you are.

  At any rate, at the end of the day, the Buddhist position is that if a religion causes people to be kind and loving, and creates these kind of people, then we should respect it, even if we cannot agree with their philosophy.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 1h
• Active

  Suresh Ran Rahas

  Jon Shu, Scientists should know what Energy is. They can’t say that the expansion of the observable universe is made by the energy that makes space. The materials in space are not massless energy, and forces can change their location, and make high and low densities. General Relativity is only a geometric interpretation. The contraction of the observable universe could easily start soon after the moving materials in space reduce the speed of the expansion. Balloons expand somewhat uniformly even if air comes inside from only one side of them. Probably, space air comes between galaxies from everywhere, causing a similar expansion. The standard model of cosmology ignores that possibility while using an unbelievably infinite energy density without matter, blocking the Big Bounce model. Energy is a work like a finished action that doesn't really have a mass. Real energy is a relatively high-speed (accelerated) expansion of a volume relative to the amount of mass of an object and space (density of the medium). Light slows down when it travels in a high-density medium, indicating that it needs space. Probably, a mass changes its symmetry relative to the speed of its continuation, but it doesn't convert mass into energy. All the field waves have some type of mass, and that change doesn't make them energy. Prof. Albert Einstein introduced energy using mass (Kilograms), and his definition of energy only represents potential energy in mass, and it is different from real energy. All the quantum elements including space are potential energy because they contain moving or rest mass. And a packet of mass should have a maximum density if it doesn't overlap with other packets of mass. But usually, the defined mass represents overlapped field waves. Likely, the wave function of quantum elements collapses due to increasing the density of their mass during the observation. The wavelength of light changes while the light is traveling because light experiences time. Prof. Einstein didn't care about what light experiences. Wave symmetry is changing relative to their speeds, and it doesn't change the absolute time they experience. Relative time doesn’t exist in reality. If the light has a mind, then it can know that it changes with time due to quantum fluctuations. Interpretations don't change the reality of time, and light itself is moving in time. Changes in both matter and space make time. If some theorists believe in Einstein's space bending, then it means they don’t care about the quantum nature of space. Some theorists tried to show the origin of matter inside a tiny singularity by turning General Relativity upside down, using an unbelievable interpretation. Likely, they didn’t know that only matter can produce energy or didn’t care about it.

  If you can read my research paper, then you will see why I said Buddhism is scientific. You should be able to understand that we shouldn't block our common sense by using unnatural principles to prove theories. Most likely the Western scientific community intentionally supports creationism in a modern way by using unscientific and unnatural principles and assumptions.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 54m
• Jon Shu

  Suresh Ran Rahas CMBR and our ability to measure it ever more precisely is actually your biggest problem, I think, if you don't like the idea that the universe had a beginning. But I'll read your paper. Do you have a link?

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 51m
• Jon Shu

  Suresh Ran Rahas says "Most likely the Western scientific community intentionally supports creationism in a modern way by using unscientific and unnatural principles and assumptions."

  And that sounds incredibly biased. The actual truth is that western materialist science worked overtime, as it were, to get exactly what you describe OUT of science. Are you just laying the foundation for an excuse when a theory you favor is shown to be defunct?

  You're definitely starting with a presupposition.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 45m
  • Edited
• Active

  Suresh Ran Rahas

  Jon Shu, Science is a belief when it is wrong and doesn't predict both the past and the future. It requires reliable scientific calculations to confirm scientific explanations. If some observed facts help to theorize and predict that the universe was a tiny singularity with an infinite density, then to call it a good scientific prediction, it should also predict its previous state with its ingredients. And the observed facts that can be used to make predictions should closely relate to the reference frame of the prediction. But there are no such observed facts supporting it like that. Hypothesis like the so-called Planck epoch (10^-43 seconds universe), Grand unification epoch (10^-43s to 10^-36s), Inflationary epoch with a rapid expansion of space (emerging a 10.6 light-years universe within 10^-32 seconds), and Quark epoch (10^-12s to 10^-5s after the Big Bang) are misleading interpretations of the theories and experiments. Some interpretations change the theory itself (E.g., they turn General Relativity upside down to predict a tiny singularity with an infinite density), and the collisions between the high-energy particles in the particle accelerators are not like the so-called Big Bang. They try to say that the 27.574 billion light-years large (CMBR distance × 2) early universe or a larger part of the universe emerged and expanded before a second. Likely, some people want to reject the requirement of a larger time that needs to explain the origin of the very huge early universe scientifically. And some people try to popularize those hypothetical epochs as if they are verified real science. We should use theories and observations correctly. Humans, animals, and trees become larger little by little after their birth, but it doesn’t mean that they were very tiny a few moments before their birth. The observable universe's beginning can't necessarily be a new beginning, and its observable growth doesn't necessarily indicate that it had a new beginning. But it doesn’t mean that there was not a beginning from zero at some point. Christianity avoided the concept and symbol of zero, and the Catholic Church refused to accept zero until some major developments in mathematics. But it is difficult for theorists to reject Big Bounce models without using nothingness (zero) in the first place to make their theories. Prof. Albert Einstein said, 'Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.' According to Buddhism, the world systems (Sakwalas) formed during the period (eon) of expansion called Vivatta (expanding) Kalpa. And then, the expansion stabilizes during the Vivattasthai Kalpa. And then, it starts to contract during Sanvatta Kalpa. And finally, the contraction stabilizes within a similar duration called Sanvattasthai Kalpa.

  You can read my updated research papers from here: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Suresh-Wanayalaege

  This is an introduction of it: https://web.facebook.com/aperahas/videos/176160705283368/

  Usually, most people develop theories using observations to explain observations, and sometimes they use unexplained principles to justify their theories. It is like reverse engineering. But, we can try to use mathematics first to explain observations and physics too. And then, we would see a lot of contradictions between them.

  

  RESEARCHGATE.NET

  Suresh WANAYALAEGE | Data Analyst | Analysis & Research | Research profile

  Suresh WANAYALAEGE | Data Analyst | Analysis & Research | Research profile

  • Like
  • Reply
  • Remove Preview
  • 19m
• Jon Shu

  Suresh Ran Rahas I'll take a look.

  You say 'doesn't predict both the past and the future.' When universal constants, such as c, are shown to be changing, real scientists call into question whether they actually ARE constants. They're clearly not, and changing a fundamental, probably the single most fundamental constant such as the speed of light has consequences that reach into the entire time continuum, both forwards and backward.

  The tool you want, while we thought it existed, it apparently doesn't. Under these conditions, expecting to be able to see into the past becomes less and less reliable, the further back you want to go, no?

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 15m

• Active

  Suresh Ran Rahas

  Jon Shu, Special relativity wouldn’t change absolute time. The so-called relative time is likely an illusion created by relative interactions. The concept of relative time is most likely a wrong interpretation that doesn't represent the fundamental interactions because the fundamental moment would pass relative to the last moment. And the fundamental time is not relative to speed. It is not only a theoretical illusion that is related to special relativity but also the high-energy muon particles that travel faster than their usual speed showed that they can travel long distances without decaying quickly. Some observations like that probably show an illusion. The higher speeds would reduce the decaying process of fundamental waves (elementary particles) because of high-energy quantum jumps or something like that, but it doesn't mean that they didn't experience time. The wavelength of light (photon) waves increases while traveling long distances, and therefore their energy reduces while traveling. The reason to increase their wavelength is not the important thing. The fact is their structural change clearly shows that they experienced time. Perhaps, the real problem is not relative to special relativity. Stable wave symmetries of wave particles would reduce the speed of their decaying process. The low-energy muon waves would have a large wave amplitude with a small wavelength that can make the muon wave symmetry unstable, causing it to decay faster. But if the high-energy muon waves have a larger wavelength with their large wave amplitude, their wave symmetry would be stable, causing them to decay slowly. Electron waves would stay stable because they relatively have low energy levels and are likely related to protons. The speed of light is not the same for all the observers because only the decaying process in the observers reduces when they travel faster. And when an observer travels at the speed of light, the speed of light that travels with the observer should be equal to zero to the observer relatively. The absolute time and speed don’t depend on wrong interpretations and errors in theories and observations.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 9m
• Jon Shu

  Suresh Ran Rahas lol. Exactly the sort of discussion I wanted to avoid, since I'm only going to understand a quarter of it. Which is why I tend to focus on the larger points, and read conflicting opinions by experts in their fields that break it down into more accessible language.

  Time is basically change. To be in time means to change. But an actual definition of time, in an absolute sense? We don't really have that yet, no. We're sure good at measuring it tho. Because we can count increments of change, in ever smaller increments.

  But ultimately this is all based on some things being constant, most generally, if you follow the trail of causes and conditions to the start, to the speed of light. We know that has changed, and is changing. This is a problem for people whom want to try to go back too far into the past, in most cases. I have a suspicion that you're simply trying to confuse me by making me look at all your pretty trees, and ignore the forest.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 3m

• Active

  Suresh Ran Rahas

  Jon Shu, If you have enough free time, then you can read and think about it more. Bye.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 1m

• Jon Shu

  Suresh Ran Rahas I downloaded the second paper on your list; it looked the most interesting to start with. Just remember that the Buddhists that authored the abhidharma and commentaries didn't have all this technology, all these tools to enable measurement of all these diverse phenomena, and they didn't have a problem with changing their theories when new facts arrived. Buddha is not a god, tho many treat him as such, today, in fact if not in name.

  Of course, my lineage was Soto Zen Buddhism, and I well understand the Indian/Tibetan looking down on such as not 'real' Buddhism. So be it - we do lack an awful lot of the mythological trappings and claim none of the paranormal magical powers being obtainable, that initially draw so very many into the Tibetan/Indian traditions in the first place.

  I already know you're biased, against the west, and for Indian and Hindu derived systems, given your focus on the void of zero. So I'll be taking your conclusions with that in mind, as well, of course.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 9m
• Active

  Suresh Ran Rahas

  Jon Shu, Ok. You can take it as you wish. Have a nice day.

  • Like
  • Reply
  • 1m

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Did the Dalai Lama recently act like Prophet Muhammad?!

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Innocent Dalai Lama likely reacted so fast without thinking about the other meanings of that act. Intelligent people can understand what Dalai Lama meant. But some unintelligent people could use it to insult Dalai Lama.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What Does the Bible Say about Creating Humans? | Creation Stories of the Ancient World: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UouSERsJ_ns

Preston Bacchus:

Genesis 2:7  "Then the Lord God formed a man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being."  From that, first God formed the body of Adam, then he breathed the breath of life into it.

 Suresh Wanayalaege:

 The church couldn't punish Charlse Darwin because he was very careful, and he didn't publish his book until he gets old.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

According to that translation, God didn't create heaven and the earth from the beginning. He was thinking that he was modifying it. But all the things that happened to the earth were completely natural. Also, God doesn't need to separate light from the darkness. The rotation of the earth and the light of the sun make the Day and Night. It is not a separation because it is only a natural rotation. Perhaps, the poor God in the Bible didn't know that he didn't create or modify anything at all. It is like some ancient knowledge about the natural evolution of the earth. Some eastern ancient teachings (Theravada teachings) explain the natural formation of the observable universe too. Somewhat wrong Translations in the verse: 1.) The earth was not a 'Complete Chaos'. It was a formless wasteland. 2.)  It was not a 'Wind'. It was 'Spirit' hovering. Just be truthful, and discover the truth. May natural nature bless you.!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WOTM: Love

The Dark Side of Online Dawah

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Star Lord, [20/04/2023 12:54 PM]:

Actually from Buddhist point of view how a universe is born when new Kalpa starts

Star Lord, [20/04/2023 12:54 PM]:

When a kalpa ends universe gets destroyed and nothing remains. So if nothing remains then how a new universe would born. Universe can't come from nothing

Suresh @ Telegram, [20/04/2023 1:54 PM]:

According to the explanations in Buddhism about the world and universe, the world starts to end during the contraction period of the universe which begins with a rain of liquid energy and destroys the world and heavenly worlds including material Brahma worlds within a duration called Sanvatta Asankhya Kalpa. The contraction of the universe continues without material worlds during Sanvattai Asankhya Kalpa. And then, the universe starts to expand with a rain of liquid energy called Sampatthi Mahamegha during a similar period called Vivatta Asankhya Kalpa. Also, the duration of the further expansion (called Vivattai Asankhya Kalpa) that starts with the formation of worlds is similar to the duration of the first period of expansion that filled the universe with a rain of liquid energy beams (called Sampatthi Mahamegha), the rain that stopped falling before the start of the formation of worlds that happens with the further expansion. Again, the universe contracts and destroy worlds during Sanvatta Asankhya Kalpa.

Perhaps, gravitons or any other force would bring matter back to the center of gravity with an acceleration, causing them to become beams of high-energy particles that gain energy with the contraction that causes matter to pass through the center of the universe. 

The period between the start of Vivattai Asankhya Kalpa and the end of Vivatta Asankhya Kalpa is called a Mahā-Kalpa.

Star Lord, [20/04/2023 8:21 PM]:

Some people say after gaining nirvana u will erase ur existence. It means nibbana means suicide

Suresh @ Telegram, [21/04/2023 7:53 AM]:

Nirvana means being natural again. LIfe is not natural, it is artificial.

Star Lord, [21/04/2023 9:53 AM]:

Tell me one point here when world systems gets destroyed and nothing remains. Then from that point how a new universe will origin ? The rain of liquid energy due to which world again starts to grow, tell me where this rain came from if nothing remains 🤔

Suresh @ Telegram, [21/04/2023 12:30 PM]:

The Buddha didn't explain a decaying process of matter. He explained the destruction process of the world systems. The remaining dusts and ashes would convert into liquid-matter when they freely travel in space.

Star Lord, [21/04/2023 10:30 PM]:

Ok

Star Lord, [21/04/2023 10:31 PM]:

Can we talk on call for few minutes I have some confusions

Star Lord, [21/04/2023 10:31 PM]:

And don't worry I think u know me I'm the same person who went to livestreams of Muslim you tubers

Star Lord, [21/04/2023 10:32 PM]:

Next time I'm planning to go to livestreams with some knowledge so that I can defend Buddhism

Star Lord, [21/04/2023 10:32 PM]:

I need ur help 🙏

Suresh @ Telegram, [22/04/2023 8:42 AM]:

Ok.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Big Bang Believers Don't Want to Know How Matter is Produced

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Yes. And they don't say that energy is only a product of mass. Energy didn't create mass because energy is only an output of the speeds of masses. Thank you so much.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

After the Oldest Galaxy, Webb Now finds A Black Hole at the Edge of the Universe

First insight knowledge: Nama rupa pariccheda nana

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What Is Richard Dawkins AFRAID Of? Eric Weinstein on The INTO THE IMPOSSIBLE Podcast

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9SVa5XxmH0

Dr Brian Keating:

Can a scientist be religious?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

The mind can change the body, supporting the evolution.

Jungle Jargon:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege    It alters your genome too but it doesn’t make you anything other than human.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Jungle Jargon, The mind is a moment of observation that can use a body of any type of being. Karma would provide a body for the mind to observe and change the body. Scientists should use their minds to unterstand the process and power of the mind. The brain is not the mind. Probably, the mind uses blood as a medium to continue its becoming (Bhavanga) nature easily. The mind's becoming process can select or make a suitable body to continue its process even after the death of the existing body.

Jungle Jargon:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege   Yes, although everything there is and every ability or power we have is given by the Spirit.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Jungle Jargon, The mind moment is natural, and it continues in Matter Zones (Kalapa) according to Buddhism.

Andy We:

"... to cheat on the rules of Science because of Jesus" - remember that there are other religions. Buddhism for instance does not necessarily interfere with scientific concepts, simply because it is not a theistic religion. So the answer is of course yes.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

The mind is the fastest thing that changes the body.

Jungle Jargon:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege    Your choice is not a physical thing.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Jungle Jargon , Smallest Matter Zones (Rupa Kalapa) are hosting the mind and allows the mind to make choices and good or bad actions (Karma), and good or bad actions have a potential to make roads of actions (Karma Patha) and produce resultants (Vipaka). But some actions of the mind called functional actions (Kriya) don't make Karma according to Buddhism. Therefore, our choices are physical actions. The actions in material things are only functional actions (Kriya) because those actions don't have a purpose to make resultants (Vipaka).

Jungle Jargon:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  There is no power or ability that is not given by God. When you know the truth, the truth will set you free. Only your Creator can perfectly cover for you Himself and remake you again from the inside out by the power of His true word as no one else ever can. There is no other absolute truth.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Jungle Jargon , If the creator God who lives in your imagination is an atheist, then you can tell your imaginary God that his abilities were given by his creator God. But it is not an absolute truth because it is only a belief. You should try to find the absolute truths in your mind and body to understand the process of them. According to Buddhism, absolute truths are 28 material forms, 52 mental factors, and the measurement (Mano) of the beauty (Cittan) called Citta. Don't let your birth place to decide your path. You shouldn't limit your knowledge to the religion you followed if you really want to understand yourself. A religion must be scientific. Probably, some beliefs and political reasons made some unscientific religions. And those religions don't explain the nature of reality as it is. But usually, the followers of those religions think that they have found the solutions to their problems.

Jungle Jargon:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege    Right, check to see if you have the absolute truth. The physical universe can’t make itself and since it’s running down, it has a non contingent eternal Creator. Every living thing consisting of 20 essential elements and 20 left handed amino acids also has a Creator since no physical thing can ever make or order its own existence. The absolute truth is that only your Creator can perfectly cover for you Himself and remake you again from the inside out by the power of His true word as no one else ever can. This is the only absolute truth. Every other physical thing is subject to change and so is not absolute.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Jungle Jargon, The indivisible elements in nature are absolute truths even if they change every moment. Those elements and the measurements of the mind can select or make suitable environments for their existence because the absolute truths contain 52 mental factors that can take decisions and support its evolution. Therefore, the measurement (Mano/Mind) is superior (Pubbangama/Primary) in the nature (Dhamma/Realities). The visible atoms are extremely large objects to the mind. The mind can continue in invisible matter in space. Also, the hidden matter called Dark Matter would host the mind to continue its process. Don't ignoring the reality by thinking that a Creator God will help you from his unscientific words. A lot of people died believing in God because they didn't use medicine for their illnesses. Sometimes, we can use the mind to see hidden realities. So you can try some advanced meditation techniques to know the truth for yourself.

Jungle Jargon:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege    You may have heard of word salad but what you are saying is more like corn meal mush wording. There are no physical absolutes. The only thing that is absolute is that you have a Creator and only your Creator can be your Savior. Think about it.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Jungle Jargon, The Planck constants are extremely small physical constants, and they are the building blocks of the emerged material processes. The research I did using binary mathematical physics and Buddhism showed me the existence of absolute truths. Time is the creator of those absolute truths. Best of luck. Bye.

Jungle Jargon:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege    Matter can’t make or direct itself according to the laws of thermodynamics.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Jungle Jargon, The forces between atoms and quantum process could make a lot of natural structures in special conditions. According to Buddhsm, the mind doesn't need a large structure to continue its process because it is a very small continuation. And the mind is continuing a becoming (Bhavanga) process using its previous actions and causes. The mental factors in the mind could shape the structures of matter to continue its becoming process because the mental factors are absolute truths, and they can help the mind to select good and bad actions. The laws of thermodynamics entirely depend on the forces in nature.

Jungle Jargon:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege     Your mind is getting in the way of you knowing the absolute truth that there’s a Creator of the fabrication of measurable time and space because of all of the atoms that matter is made up of. Your Creator is able to recreate you again so that you will never die even if you die. It’s not something you can do for yourself. It’s what the Holy Spirit can do for you because of the provision of the death of Jesus instead of us. God can’t have anything to do with us without His perfect provision for us. We can’t make our own provision for ourselves because of our own corruption. God is not corrupt so He can perfectly cover for us Himself.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Jungle Jargon , The causes and effects in nature (Karma) support the mind to develop some faculties (Indriya) to continue/conserve some of its behaviors even after the death. It is only a natural process in nature called dependant origination according to Buddhism. Therefore, our emotional actions would impact the physical environment, causing the environment to become somewhat emotionally intelligent collectively. We can't say that our thoughts can't change the environment. According to some deep teachings in Buddhism, the Buddha's good qualities exist in nature and help us even after his death. Everything is a miracle to you if you don't want to think scientifically.

Jungle Jargon:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege    Everything is from a supernatural cause since no natural thing can cause itself. God holds the universe together and He can take it apart. There is nothing that not by the power of God. All things are are by the power that He gives. Nature gets none of the credit (glory).

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Jungle Jargon , You are saying the same thing without explaining how a God exists without a cause, and how he makes everything from nothing. However, I know that you studied the process of nature from the followers of Abrahamic religions. And I know how they try to say that this universe is a new universe, and time started a few billion years ago, and so on. So I feel sad about the followers of those unintelligent people. Don't think that all the scientists are intelligent. And don't try to believe the picture that they try to make in your brain. A lot of them were afraid to the church from the beginning. It has not changed yet much.

Jungle Jargon:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege    Obviously things were caused so there has to be a non contingent cause for the fabrication of limited time and space that we find ourselves in. This cause has to be unlimited (eternal all knowing and all powerful). It’s really not so complicated.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Jungle Jargon, It is a childish argument, and you are just craving to give your responsibilities to someone else to feel good like a child. Your requirement to create a creator to create the universe doesn't make a creator better than this universe. You are believing the definition of the concept of creator God. You didn't try to study what I tried to teach you. Your curiosity to know the nature of reality is not strong enough because of your beliefs. You are just telling others to believe a God to save us from his anger if we don't believe him. Your reason to believe in a God is also a childish reason. And your imaginary God behaves like an unintelligent child who wants to receive love from people forcefully. The scientific community in the West tries to support creationism with or without understanding the childish mindset of the followers of creationism. Perhaps, a lot of them are childish too.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Is there LIFE after DEATH ? Matt Dillahunty vs Dinesh D'Souza

Suresh Wanayalaege:

The lifetime of the mind is smaller than the smallest time called Planck Time according to Buddhism because the smallest matter zones (Kalapa) are hosting the mind to continue the mind moment from moment to moment. The mind moments arise, exist, and disappear before the matter zone disappears. Therefore, the mind moments can easily continue between matter zones even after the death of the body. We already die and reborn from moment to moment according to Buddhism. The process of the rebirth is logically imaginable.

Jan Hertsens:

Spiderman is also imaginable.  Somebody did.  And made a movie of it.  Therefore, he exists, right?  You can't prove he doesn't! BELIEVE in his webness!

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Jan Hertsens , Spiderman is not LOGICALLY imaginable. The teachings in Buddhism about the process of the mind show strong logical reasons to prove the process of rebirth. If you know about Quantum Jumps, then you would be able to understand that some quantum elements can jump and catch other locations, violating the rules of chemistry.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Buddhism Debunked | Buddha Kiyun Khuda Nahi Hosakta? | Dr. Mufti Yasir Nadeem Al Wajidi https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1Qwj2VvgII

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Kaaba worshiping is also idle worshiping. And it is a support to the tourism industry in Arab.

RAMEEZ SHEIKH:

Naa kaaba ko worship karte hain naa waha kisi tourist ki entry allow hai. Sirf muslims Hajj-Uamra namaz-tawaf jo karne ata hai bus unki hee entry allowed hai kisi non-muslim ki bhi nahi.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @RAMEEZ SHEIKH , Muslim tourists are enough for Soudi Arabia.

𝘼𝙡𝙡 𝙇𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙡𝙮 𝙈𝙤𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙣:

Suresh Wanayalaege Tum Mandir me puja karne jaate ho ya Aarthik Karan ke Liye ya Murti pujari ke Bank Blance ke liye ??

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @𝘼𝙡𝙡 𝙇𝙤𝙫𝙚𝙡𝙮 𝙈𝙤𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙣 , Mohomad or the writers of Islamic texts wanted to bring people to Kaaba to develop Arabia.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Buddhist teachings are scientific, and base on dependent origination.

Sohail Khan:

Explain

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Sohail Khan , Buddhist texts explains the process of both the mind and matter. The origin of matter: 4 Mahabhuta made 8 Pure-Eight elements. And then 24 elements emerged from them inside the smallest unit of matter. The mind continues in those units of matter. They made the matter Body (elementary particles) called Rupa Sarira. And then, they made the Atoms called Rupa Santhana. It is an extremely scientific explanation.

I'm_Ajaz🧐:

​ @Suresh Wanayalaege   May I ask if you have ever read the Quran?? 😅

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @I'm_Ajaz🧐  I could study the racism and unethical teachings in Quran using Ex-Muslim resourses.

June Day:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  why not reach out to any original and real source to know abt Islam and Quran?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @June Day , There is nothing special to learn in Quran. But I tried to learn Islam from Zakir Naik's talks on peaceTV and from a few other talks. Buddha's teachings are far better than the teachings in Islam. You should try to study Buddha's teachings using the original and real sources if it is safe to you. But you will not be able to convert to Buddhism publicly because of the laws in Islam regarding the apostetes. You shoud have a pure mind to understand the difference. You can try to study the different between Humans and other beings to understand that there are a lot of similarities between them. You should have a kind heart to understand that innocent apostetes and other beings feel pain too.

June Day:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  I doubt you tried Quran and Zakir Naik's lectures. the actual matter with people like you is, you just like to say bad things about Islam and muslims, you ignore the ground reality and history. You are unable to show any role model, any instructions or guidance from your religion to lead one's life in any capacity or any role, you just beat about the bush. For example, what guidance do your religious teachings have for a person as husband or wife?? If you have any, then it's scientific!

June Day:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  actually it's You who need a pure mind and a kind heart to understand Islam, and need to understand that Muslims feel pain too. It's just that You need to be honest and truthful!

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @June Day , Theravada Buddhist canon is 11 times larger than the Christian Bible. You can study a lot of ethical teachings from those texts. Those texts explain about the remarkable lifestyles of Buddhists. According to those texts, husband and wife should have equal mental qualities if they want to be good partners. But a religion must show the scientific process of living beings. The absolute realities mentioned in those texts are smaller than elementary particles. Those teachings explain the process of absolute realities in detail. It is the knowledge we need to realize the truth. It is called 'Nama Rupa Paricceda Gnana' in Pali.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @June Day , Islamic teachings are harmful for non-muslims, ex-muslims, children and for females in some countries. But the muslims always like to say that they are the victims. Muslims need illigal armies to follow the laws in Islam while showing that they try to protect human rights. But strong Islamic nations allow religious racism, and allow punishing ex-Muslims and activits. It is disgusting to me when muslims say that they are the victims enjoying the religious freedom and human rights while living in non-muslim countries.

June Day:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  I am a simple person, I dont have access to those heavy volumed books of wisdoms and quotes, I cant read them, I don't have any science education, now what do I do? Who should I look upon as a role model to lead my life in any certain status and situation?? And are the teachings of Buddhism still intact? Are there any people around who follow it word to word as was followed by Buddha (btw Buddha is respectable for muslims too, as some scholars say he might have been a Prophet, even if not, was a pious and God-fearing man)

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @June Day, The nature of reality is not something about us because it is what we have to face whether we are Humans or not. Humans can use their intelligence to understand it better with the help of Buddhism to end the dangerous cycle of rebirth. The problem is all Humans are not intelligent enough to understand it, and sometimes they try to hide the truth. You can try to study the nature of reality yourself if you can stop believing that you know the nature of reality because of your brainwashed mind. Currently, I don't like to spend a lot of time with people who can't understand that the nature of reality is natural. They try to make a lot of assumptions and irrelevant arguments to tell that it is a miracle. They are blind about the nature of reality they can feel and experience. Bye for now.

ian wright:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  Your sources are not reliable. You can never prove what was originally said by Buddha. It is all mind trap, the rabbit hole of Buddhist logic...Human wisdom is foolishness in front of GOD.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

​ @ian wright , Most reliable Buddhist teachings are Theravada Buddhist teachings because those teachings were preserved by Fully enlightened (Arhat) Theros. Mohamad couldn't read and write, and he didn't have any power of mind. We can't trust bad Humans. The God in your mind is only hiding in your brain.

ian wright:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  Can you prove Buddha ever existed? give me evidence from his time period. All evidences are after many centuries after Buddha's "supposed" time period. Buddha was fictional character, a cartoon character of spiritual world. OK. Thervada people worships human and animal bones kept in stupa! Do you think people who found "the truth" behaves like this? Enlightenment is all superstition. There is no such thing as enlightened. These people wrote their own street wisdom and sold it in the name of Buddha, Ambedkar did the same..!

Suresh Wanayalaege:

​ @ian wright, King Ajasatru sponsored the first Buddhist council, and he lived during the time of the Buddha. Archeological evidence and his statues exist all around India. Ashoka Empire sponsored the third Buddhist council. The development of Pali and Sanskrit, the origin story in Genesis 1:1, and a lot of religions developed after his time. The order of the Buddhist monk is coming from the Buddha's time. Also, the Buddha's teachings are extremely scientific. Mohamad could easily learn how to make a religion if he studied other religions because there were a lot of religions in his time. A lot of people didn't care about him until he moved to another place and increased his political and army power. He didn't make the Quran, and you shouldn't trust him because he was not a good Human. We can't trust politicians because usually, they don't care about ethics. And they just want to control people to protect their power.

ian wright:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  Buddha's teaching of meditation leading to nirvana is scientific? Sanyasa is scientific? wearing Bhagwa colored saree and begging is scientific? enlightenment is scientific? Tell me why no Buddha is from shudra caste or woman? is this your science?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @ian wright, A few scientific explanasions in Buddhism: The universe is running on smallest constants. The Buddha said that the hardest thing he did after attaining the Buddhahood was looking at the process of the mind and matter. He could see the smallest time (Kshana), the smallest mind, smallest matter, the expansion and contraction of world systems, etc. If you purified your mind, then your mind stops making causes (Karma) that continues the mind after the death of the body because a purified mind doesn't have a greed to have a rebirth. He explained it in detail scientifically to Gods in heavens. It was a single discourse, but there are 42000 teachings. Also, the other 42000 teachings and commentaries contain scientific teachings. Those teachings are better and deeper than irrelevent interpretations of the followers of other religions. Knowledge is not available for free sometimes. You have to pay attention.

ian wright:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  Ok, tell me how you purify your mind? in washing machine?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @ian wright, The process of purification of the mind takes a lot of time because we have to develop a lot of faculties/dominants (Indriya like knowledge-faculty, attention-faculty, courage-faculty) to support the moment of realization. And the noble eightfold path helps us develop 8 emotional qualities that must be applied to the moment of enlightenment simulteously. If we can cultivate good mental qualities, then they can help us to receive a good rebirth. Usually, the path of Buddhist monks is easier than the path of lay Buddhists because Buddhist monks can use a lot of time to develop mental qualities. We can see our good and bad mental qualities if we can give time to look at them. And then, the mind starts to purify itself.

June Day:

I'm surprised at your "beating about the bush" tact!! Couldn't find any science in your lectures. Although I very respectfully mentioned Buddha, but you in almost all your comments have criticised our beloved Prophet Muhammad PBUH, I won't care whether your Budhism is scientific or not, but definitely miss moralities and good behavior along with impracticality too in it.

In one comment you say bad things abt Muhammad PBUH bcz He PBUH couldn't read and write, and in next comment you accuse Him PBUH of "learning and studying other religions at His PBUH time and thus creating a new religion Islam", what to say abt Your enlightened, scientific mind now??!!!

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @June Day, Yes, you don't care whether a religion is scientific or not, and don't care what is good and what is bad. You proved it. Truth sounds like hate to those who hate the truth. We could find swards in a lot of mosques, and Islam uses swards a lot. It shows hatefulness and forcefulness than peacefulness. Also, you don't care about the hateful words and violence mentioned in Islamic texts too. But you can't even tell muslims publicly that you leaved Islam because some of them or Islamic government would not leave you alive to let you tell that it was a joke. You can try that method to see how Islam tries to make brothers forcefully. It is an insult to peace. They are afraid to allow others and non-believers to challange their texts because they are not peaceful enough to tolerate them, and they don't care whether Islam is peaceful or not. You don't care about the truth, and you would tell lies to protect lies. You are trying get respect while doing disrepectful things. But I don't usually expect respect because I care about truth only. Sometimes, the so-called respectful society tried to hide the truth, disrespecting the truth. Don't try to use the word respect to protect lies and bad actions.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Walking with Monks: My 5-day Buddhist Monastery Stay in Sri Lanka

JESUS IS BAD - Sam Harris vs Jordan Peterson

😰 OUR GREAT LESSON! Please Learn this, I beg of you 🤗

गगन मलिक - बौद्ध धम्म 🙏💙| फ़िल्म अभिनेता गगन मलिक बौद्ध धम्म का प्रचार💐🌍 #buddha #buddhism #jaybhim

Suresh Wanayalaege:

The truth in dhamma shines when it opens up. Kind and intelligent people can understand the value of true dhamma. Thank you a lot. ❤

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Many-Worlds Interpretation - Quantum Odyssey 13

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Maha-Meru (Large-Emerged) mountain is a huge hidden mountain according to some texts. And it would look like a spiral arm around the earth acording to the positions of the four continents of 4 kinds of Humans mentioned in those texts.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Buddhism Past Present Future by Rev B. Piyarathan Thero (LLB/MA)

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Revealing the truth is very important. 🙏

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Connection Between Psychedelics and Buddhism https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUWFb1nFBrY

Hep Hep:

I appreciate that you interview people with other experiences, beliefs, and practices.  I recognize that God gave us free will, so we are all free to choose. However, free choice does not mean free truths. 

I like what you said Michael, about already recognizing the beauty and wonderful things in the intricacies of our beautiful creation in our natural life without the necessity of drugs. 

I myself have looked at water in the river and HAVE noticed each bubble and the beauty of the movement in the water. But I also at the same time recognized the influence of God in all these things. From this young man he marveled at the intricacies of nature, but he never recognized the source. He never came to a deeper understanding of anything.

Michael hit the nail on the head. No actual wisdom was gained or learned. This gentleman   is a bunch of vagueuries. 

I hope he continues to seek the truth not "his truth" but the actual truth in the God of the Bible.

Jn 14:6

Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Training the mind to remove unskillful emotions helps to purify the mind to stop rebirth.

Fury_Blade:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  Stop rebirth? What do you mean?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Fury_Blade, Usually, the mind flows in blood in the body, but it can move through space, and find another body.

Fury_Blade:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  So the soul in your understanding is just “taking a ride” in the body, so to speak? Does the body even mean anything, granted this way of thinking?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Fury_Blade, It is not only a my way of thinking. The higher teachings in Theravada texts mentioned how it works, and cause rebirth. A becoming process continues the mind like a becoming process continues a wave. But a becoming process doesn't represent a permanent soul. The places where the mind emerge are called Citta Santhana in Pali. Fundamental material formations and interactions make processes, supporting the emergence of the mind again and again. A stream of mind is called a Citta Viti in Pali. The truth in true Dhamma shines when it opens up. But usually, a lot of people don't try to find the knowledge from the original and reliable sources.

Fury_Blade:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  I’m not sure I follow that completely, but I think I get the general idea. To contrast; Based on what Jesus taught (and the teachings of the early Catholic Church), nobody is reborn, the soul separates from the body, you face judgement, and either go to purgatory, heaven, or hell. Death in this life is, in short, the beginning of the soul’s eternal life, or eternal death. What do you think about Jesus in general? His resurrection, what he said and did, etc. Does your religion (you haven’t told me which) agree with anything he says or even acknowledge him? Asking out of curiosity.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

​ @Fury_Blade, Jesus most likely didn't die on the cross even according to the Bible. He didn't need to take his dead body to heaven. Arising from the dead and resurrection are different, and the resurrection story added later. Romans wanted to protect Jesus from Jewish priests. Most probably, Romans could help Jesus to escape, and use his name to make the Roman Catholicism. Perhaps, Jesus didn't have enough time to share his knowledge. Therefore, his teachings and Roman texts are not enough to understand the process of life.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Theravada Buddhism vs Mahayana | Prelims Essentials for UPSC - Ancient History

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Probably, Hinduism could influence Mahayana traditions, using the story of Rama. And probably, Chandraguptha (King Ashoka's greadfather) made the Maurya Kingdom with the help of his european wife, and supported to make modern Jainaism with new stories. And Hinduism could develop from it too. Also, they could use Jataka tales to make their stories. Abhidharma was available in Sutta Pitaka of oral traditions. But probably, it wasn't much popular. 👍

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adipurush (Official Trailer) Hindi | Prabhas | Saif Ali Khan | Kriti Sanon | Om Raut | Bhushan Kumar

@ block buster movie 6235:

Prabhas + Sharad kelkar voice = totally Goosebump 🔥🔥

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Valmiki's Ramayana is a modified story. Originally, Sita was sister of Rama-Pandith. And they didn't fight with Ravana. And it didn't mention Lanka, Ravana, Hanuman, and a lot more things. King Ashoka's grandfather (Chandraguphtha Maurya) made the Maurya Kindom with the help of his european girlfiend, and supported to make Jainaism. Perhaps, his support to Jainism of early Hindus could become a challange to early Buddhism and Buddhists. Also, modern Hinduism developed later with new texts written in Sanskrit. And their texts were used to convert the Buddha into an Avatar of Vishnu by converting Rama-Panditha into an Avatar of Vishnu. Sanskrit scripts introduced after 500 BCE, and oral Sanskrit doesn't make written Sanskrit older than 500 BCE. Also, they could easily use Buddhist Jataka tales and deep teachings in Buddhism to write their stories and teachings. Unintelligent educated people could cause a lot of damage to the history of the world like that on political and high ego based reasons and beliefs.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Infidel Noodle1 hour ago

Two Ex-Muslim men, Yousef Mehrad and Sadrollah Fazeli Zare, were brutally executed 3 days ago in Iran for apostasy and blasphemy. Additional charges included “encouraging atheism” and “insulting Islam”.

This is the horrific price Ex-Muslims can be forced to pay under a Sharia government.

My heart goes out to the families of both men and the people of Iran.

No one should face persecution for exercising their basic rights and freedoms.

Source: https://amp.abc.net.au/article/102322904

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Islam is a disrespect to humanity.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Give respect, get respect!✊ ☪️

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Face the Reality

  · 

We live in a time where intelligent people are being silenced so that stupid people won’t be offended.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THEREVADA AND VAJRAYANA BUDDHISM

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Thank you for your profound explanation. Early Brahamanism and modern Hinduism are very different. The first council of Jainism was the start of modern Jainism and modern Hinduism.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOW to ACHIEVE FREEDOM from SAMSĀRA

things you forgot before you were born.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dan Hooper | At The Edge of Time: Exploring The Mysteries of Our Universe's First Seconds

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWuYhkTj73o

Richard Marcus:

Your professors taught you what to think, not HOW to think. If I were you, I'd sue for a full refund of tuition.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

The lifetime of early galaxies measured using JWST telescope disproved the beginning of time in our universe. 

Pentcho Valev:

Einstein: "If the speed of light depends even in the least on the speed of the light source, then my whole theory of relativity, including the theory of gravitation, is wrong."

The speed of light does depend on the speed of the source, as originally, prior to fudge-factoring that distorted the analysis, proved by the Michelson-Morley experiment.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Definitely, his principle is wrong. Energy is not massive, and it is an output of mass. Therefore, it doesn't show the start of time. We must dismiss his principle to be normal again.

Thierry Phillips:

 @Suresh Wanayalaege  Propose a mechanism for the generateion of a Cooper pair in free space from a photon.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Thierry Phillips, Photons contain moving mass. Photons are not massless in reality, and they need free space to travel. Mathematicians should know the real nature of photons. They shouldn't make theories to make mass using energy to support beliefs. They have made a Big Error theory.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A person GREATER THAN GOD ? Sam Harris vs Jordan Peterson

Suresh Wanayalaege:

An interesting conversation. The concept called creator God is helpful to ignore the nature of life. Thank you so much Mr. Sam Harris for making very good arguments.

Strannick:

How does the concept called Creator God" ignore the "nature of life"?

Dalym:

​ @Strannick  I think he's referring to the God of the gaps phenomenon.

Thunder was explained in the past by blaming gods like Zeus and Thor. This didn't contribute to an actual understanding of thunder.

Strannick:

Nietzsche, and St Paul, both rightly said, without God, everything is permitted. That's not a good thing. Definately not a God thing

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Strannick, According to the Bible, Jesus helped to catch fish. And he turned water into wine. It was like a God's permision to eat animals and drink alcohol. Innocent living beings have a right to live, and a God didn't create them for us to eat. We can identify our good and bad actions by observing our feelings and thoughts like greed, anger and delusion. Therefore, we can use common sense to be better people if we really care how the life of living beings work. We can investigate our thoughts by using meditationall practices to understand deeper truths. The life is more complex than you think.

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Strannick, The concept of God can't decide the nature of afterlife of living beings. Thinking that they receive forgiveness from a God for sins is a way to ignore natural causes and effects. Logically, we should think that our greed, anger, and delusion can become natural causes to give us bad results within this life or in another life. Also, God is not a good concept to use to ignore the natural potential to receive an afterlife because we can see a lot of living beings suffer a lot. Definitely, we have to cultivate good thoughts to receive a better afterlife if our thoughts are the causes that make results. Expecting unnatural benefits while Ignoring the natural causes is childish. We should think how to control the natural continuation of life.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Do you have FREE WILL ? Sam Harris

Suresh Wanayalaege:

Free will would depend on the time we use to take a decision. Sooner: no free will.

Slavko Desik:

Did you catch his example of endless deliberation over which hand to move? What do you make of it?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Slavko Desik, A story: A man decided to help someone. But he took around 3 days to help. Then, a supreme person said that the power of his merit reduced due to waiting for 3 days to help. He was a very kind person. Probably, it means that if he had to take his decision sooner, then he had to take a decision without updating himself.

Slavko Desik:

Suresh Wanayalaege I get your analogy, but it doesn't translate well to the issue at hand. His example is much more instructive. What did you make of it?

Suresh Wanayalaege:

 @Slavko Desik, Our reaction would depend on the time we take to react.