Buddhist Essentials and Concepts

Buddhism is the greatest religion in this world and in the universe. It explains about the existence of living beings. Researching on memories of some children who remember previous life, about Hypnosis, Near-Death Experiences, Ghosts, Meditation and Buddhist Abhdhamma teachings help us to prove Rebirth. - 500 Enlightened (Arhat) Sri Lankan Buddhist Monks protected the Buddha Dhamma by writing the words of the Great Teachings in the Pali language around 100 BCE. *Buddhist Essentials and Concepts

My ideas and comments on Buddhism - Page 18

Prof. B. Alan Wallace talks on “Mind, Emptiness and Quantum Physics."

Suresh Madusanka:

According to Buddhist Quantum Physics there are 8 elementary ghosts (particles) called Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka).

I think this is it: "Finding The Dimensions In The Universe Mathematically"

According to this mathematical formula: (a+b)2=a2+2ab+b2

This is my theory of everything:

Distance of Directions in beginning of the Universe: (+0-0)6

i: (+1-(-1))3

ii: (+0.0-0.0)3

= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas

A: + (+1)3

B: - ((+1)3 x (-1)

C: - ((-1)2 x (+1)2))

D: + (-1)2 x (+1)

- (

E: + (+1)2 x (-1)

F: - ((+1)2 x (-1)2

G: - ((-1)3 x (+1)))

H: + (-1)3)

)) x

ii: (+0.0-0.0)3

= ( This should be the 12 elementary particles (of matter) and 4 basic forces in Standard Model (in particle physics). 12 Elementary particles: (6 quarks:) up, charm, top, Down, Strange, Bottom and (3 electrons:) electron, muon, tau and (three neutrinos:) e, muon, tau. And 4 basic forces: the gravitational force, the electromagnetic force, the weak nuclear force, and the strong nuclear force.

01: + (+(1))(+1)3

02: - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1)

03: - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))

04: + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)

- (

05: + (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1)

06: - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2

07: - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))

08: + (+(1))(-1)3

)

- (

09: + (-(1))(+1)3

10: - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1)

11: - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2))

12: + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)

- (

13: + (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1)

14: - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2

15: - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1)))

16: + (-(1))(-1)3))

))) x

This should be the Higgs boson in Standard Model (in particle physics):

17: (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)

- W. Suresh Madusanka

(It is the first part of 'The Theory Of Everything'.)

There is space for 6 dimensions because of the 6 directons of the Universe. I have explained how (+1-(-1))3 dimensions combined and make 8 dimensional formations including 4 dimensional forms with 3 dimensions and 4 dimensional forms with 4 dimensions. And then a 5th dimension (+1-(-1)) from this (+0.0-0.0)3 with a strange field (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which caused to form the 6 quarks, 6 leptons, 4 forces and a strange Higgs boson in standard model in particle physics.

(+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3

(+0.0-0.0)3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)

Most Possible or Probable Outputs of (+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) :

(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.0-0.0) x (0) x (0) x (+0.0-0.0) ----(A)

(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) x (+0.0x(0)-0.0x(0)) ----(B)

From the (A):

(+0.000 - 0.000) x 1_.. = (+0.0-0.0) x (0) x (0) x 1..x(1/1) ----(P)

((+0.000 - 0.000) x 1_..)/ ((0) x 1..x(1/1)) = (+0.0-0.0) x (0) ----(C)

From the (B) and (C):

(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) x ((+0.000 - 0.000) x 1_..)/ ((0) x 1..x(1/1))

1_.... x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) x (1....x(3/3) x 1_..)/ ((0) x 1..x(1/1)) ----(Q)

1_.... x 1..x(1/1) x (+0.0-0.0) x (0) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_..) = (+0.000/(0) - 0.000/(0)) ----(D)

From the (B) and (D):

(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.0x(0)-0.0x(0)) x 1_.... x 1..x(1/1) x (+0.0-0.0) x (0) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_..)

(+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) = (+0.00-0.00) x (+0.00-0.00) x 1_.... x 1..x(1/1) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_..)

Using this (a+b)2=a2+2ab+b2 Mathematical formula to get the Most Possible or Probable Outputs of this result:

(+0.00-0.00) x (+0.00-0.00) x 1_.... x 1..x(1/1) / (1....x(3/3) x 1_..)

= (0.00^2 - (1...... x 1......) x 0.00 x 0.00 + 0.00^2) x 1_.... x 1....x(3/3) / (1......x(5/5) x 1_..)

= (0.00000 - (1......) x (+Null-Null) x 0.00000 /(5/5) + 0.00000) x 1_.... x 1....x(3/3) / (+Null-Null) x 1_..

= ((0.00000 + 0.00000) x 1....x(3/3) - (1......) x 0.00000 x (+Null-Null)/(5/5) x 1....x(3/3)) x 1_.... / (+Null-Null) x 1_..

Starting to use the 6th dimension. But it makes many small forms of it, because it is unable to make a large main dimension.

= ((0.00000 + 0.00000) x 1....x(3/3) - (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 x (+Null-Null)/(5/5)) x 1_.... / (+Null-Null) x 1_..

= (((1 x 0.00000 + 1 x 0.00000) x 1....x(3/3)) - ((+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 x (+Null-Null)/(5/5))) x 1_.... / (+Null-Null) x 1_..

= (0.00000 x 2...., x (+0.5......-(-0.5......))x(3/3) - (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 x (+Null-Null)/(5/5)) x 1_.... / (+Null-Null) x 1_..

= (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x (0.00000 x 2...., x(3/3) - 1....x(3/3) x 0.00000 x (+Null-Null)/(5/5)) x 1_.... / (+Null-Null) x 1_..

= (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x (2...., x(3/3) - 1....x(3/3) x (+Null-Null)/(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / (+Null-Null) x 1_..

= (+0.5......-(-0.5......)) x 3 x (2....,/3 - 1..../3 x (+ - )xNull/(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / (+Null-Null) x 1_..

= (+1.5......-(-1.5......)) x (2....,/3 - 1..../3 x (+ - )xNull/(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / (+Null-Null) x 1_..

= (+0.5......-(-0.5......) +1.......-(-1.......)) x (2....,/3 - (1..../3)xNull/(5/5) + (1..../3)xNull/(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / (+Null-Null) x 1_..

So, the final output of this (+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) is nearly: (+0.5-(-0.5) +1-(-1)) x (2/3 - (1/3)xNull/(5/5) + (1/3)xNull/(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / (+Null-Null) x 1_..

According to the Standard Model of Particle Physics,

the Spin of most elementary particles = 1/2 (or 0.5)

the Charge of some Quarks = 2/3

the Charge of other Quarks = -1/3

the Charge of electrons = -1

According to my mathematical calculations the +1 dimension is unstable because there is already a larger +2/3 dimension against the -1/3 dimension, so that can be the reason to disappear the charge in neutrinos.

I think my mathematical calculations clearly show a similarity to the elementary particles in the Standard Model in Particle Physics.

- W. Suresh Madusanka

(This is my second part of The Theory Of Everything.)

* According to Buddhism Suddhāṭṭhaka (“suddha” for “pure” or fundamental” + “āṭṭha” or “eight”) means a unit of matter consisting of eight fundamental entities. Four of these are the “satara mahā bhūta“ (The Four Great Bhūta. Bhūta is another name for “ghost” because of their elusive nature.): Pathavi (Solid/Earth), āpo (Liquid/Water), tejo (Heat/Fire), vāyo (Gas/Air). These are indeed the most fundamental units of matter, but they cannot be detected by themselves. The four mahā bhūta ('Matter') are with four basic “gati” ('Character of Matter'/ 'Antimatter'): Pathavi gati (hard/coarse), āpo gati (bound/attracted/liquidity), tejo gati (fiery or energetic), vāyo gati (motion). Thus, in Buddha Dhamma, it says, “gati (character) attracts a similar gati”. (*Read more about "The Origin of Matter – Suddhāṭṭhaka" at Pure Dhamma website.)

*I discovered and used the real Mathematics of the Universe to make the calculation of the start of the Universe. - Suresh

--------------------------------------------------------

Alan Guth - What Does A Fine-Tuned Universe Mean?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pp3X-Xr6Lf0

Cosmik Relic:

How many Higgs bosons does you theory predict and what are their masses and charges?

Suresh Madusanka:

@Cosmik Relic The Higgs filed came from this: (+0.0-0.0)^3 and that is what made the 5th dimension (Mass Dimension). According to Quantum physics the Higgs field gave mass to elementary particles.

The Higgs bosons came from this: (+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)

Still I'm not sure about the Mathematical value of the Higgs boson. If it is 'Null' or 1 then I think there is only one Higgs boson, and if it is 'Null' and 1 or 0.5 then it can make 2 different types of higgs bosons.

I'm stil analysing this to find the Higgs boson mathematically : (+0.5-(-0.5) +1-(-1)) x (2/3 - (1/3)xNull/(5/5) + (1/3)xNull/(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / (+Null-Null) x 1_..

And it shows enough mathematical reasons to explain the charge, but I'll have to continue the mathematical calcutions to find the masses.

Ferdinand Kraft:

Suresh Madusanka Sureshit.

Suresh Madusanka:

@Ferdinand Kraft, Some believers have a blind faith, and they don't like to explore the truth if it is against their faith.!

---------------------------------------------------------

WHY PEOPLE ARE LEAVING ISLAM

Suresh Madusanka:

Thanks for the video. Islam proved to me that there is no creator God, because the Muslims are the only people who follow a single God, but they have the highest religious terrorism, so their God is like a leader of a mafia gang, or there is not real creator god.

------------------------------------------

Faith vs. Knowing in Early Buddhism

------------------------------------------

Roger Penrose - Why Did Our Universe Begin?

Closer To Truth:

Our sincere congratulations to Sir Roger Penrose for winning the 2020 Nobel Prize in Physics! Well deserved!

Suresh Madusanka:

Yes. That is true. Time was irrelevent even after the big bang because of the high energy in the Universe both during and after the big bang. According to Quantum physics Mass makes the time, and the Higgs field can't give Mass to elementary particle even after the big bang until the Universe start to cool down, and it shows that the Mass is not a part of the calculation of the big bang, and the mass should be a sub dimension. It means that there were 2 main steps to complete in order to make the current Universe. I think these are the 2 steps of the Universe which occurred during the big bang and after the big bang according to the 6 directions and the 6 distances of the first start of the Universe: (+0-0)^6

= (+1-(-1))^3

x (+0.0-0.0)^3

The 2 steps in detail:

(+0-0)^6 =

(i.)

{

(+1-(-1))^3 =

(+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1) - ((+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3)

(+0.0-0.0)^3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)

}

(ii.)

{

(+ (+(1))(+1)3 - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1) - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)

- (+ (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1) - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) + (+(1))(-1)3)

- (+ (-(1))(+1)3 - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1) - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)

- (+ (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1) - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-(1))(-1)3)))

x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)

}

Output of this (+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) is nearly: (+0.5-(-0.5) +1-(-1)) x (2/3 - (1/3)xNull/(5/5) + (1/3)xNull/(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / (+Null-Null) x 1_..

According to the Standard Model of Particle Physics,

the Spin of most elementary particles = 1/2 (or 0.5)

the Charge of some Quarks = 2/3

the Charge of other Quarks = -1/3

the Charge of electrons = -1

I think my mathematical calculations clearly show a similarity to the elementary particles in the Standard Model in Particle Physics.

- W. Suresh Madusanka

James McCaul:

@Suresh Madusanka So are you saying 0=0? what is the physical meaning of your calculations?

Suresh Madusanka:

@James McCaul , According to Quantum Physics almost all the elemantary particles don't have a single Quantum state until we interact with it to measure it, so the elementary particles are a representation of many dimensions at once, and I think it is not a wave, but it interacts like a wave too. The universe is based on dimensional interactions, and the dimensions don't have a position and a speed because of the singularity of the universe. So the physical meaning of the elemantary particles is a representation of the singularity of the early universe too. We can use the duality of the 6 directions of the universe to find the dimensions of the Universe.

If you can't understand that the 0 should have a direction and it should be represented as (+0-0) with a direction, and you can't use only one (+0-0) to show all the directions then you can't understand this mathematical formula:

The duality of 6 directions and the 6 distances of the first start of the Universe: Matter + Antimatter = (+0-0)^6 + (-0+0)^6

The Universe made only 16 elementary particles with the nature of matter and antimatter and a Higgs boson, but maybe the Universe made another 16 elementary particles against the other 16 elementary particles which caused to annihilate each other, but when the dimensional formations used dimensions to form particles, mass, charge and spin between shared dimensions with dimensional gaps it caused a tiny unbalance of the Ratio of the Matter quarks and Antimatter quarks in the early Universe (3000000001:3000000000) which caused to survive a very small portion of elementary particles (1 from 3000000001).

The early universe was a thing with nothings, so the direction of a nothing (0) thing = +0-0

What if +0-0 can make +0.0-0.0 and +1-1? Then it should be the start of something (distance and dimensions) of the Universe.

According to this mathematical formula:

(a+b)2=a2+2ab+b2

If the, a= +0 and b= -0:

(+0-0)2 = 02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0 x 0 + 02

(+0-0)6 = (+0-0)2 x (+0-0)2 x (+0-0)2 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3

--------------------------------------

Lightbringer:

big bang theory is nonsense

Suresh Madusanka:

@Lightbringer, I think the Big bang is a part of the cyclic process of the Universe which has a connection with the edge of the Universe. And maybe the big bang is an illusion of the Universe which makes the Universe look very small from the destruction process by removing the Mass from the particle before the next big bang. So if that is just a temporary separation of some groups of particles (earth/sun), then maybe it has a potential to rearrange some major groups of particles (earth/sun) with nearly the same materials again. However, we can't find a good balance in the cosmic background, so it shows the existence of a previous Universe, and every big bang can change the size of the Universe. Maybe we will be able to find the process of the big bang mathematically.

Lightbringer:

@Suresh Madusanka I think this universe is just information, like an advanced video game and there is no matter or physical reality, just codes that we decode into what we experience, all of it inside a computer outside this reality.

Suresh Madusanka:

@Lightbringer, My first comment explains it much better than your assumption, and I think there is a Buddhist explanation about it too. According to Buddhist Quantum Physics there are 8 elementary ghosts (particles) called Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka). It sounds like that there are 8 invisible elementary particles with some activities as Ghosts. Those 8 different types of activities made information, atoms etc. According to my mathematical calculations the elementary particles (of the standard model in particle physics) received the nature of matter and antimatter. The Universe made only 16 elementary particles with the nature of matter and antimatter and a Higgs boson, and the Universe didn't make another 16 elementary particles with the nature of antimatter only, but maybe the Universe made another 16 elementary particles against the other 16 elementary particles which caused to annihilate each other, but when the dimensional formations used dimensions to form particles, mass and charge a set of particles were between 0/3 - 1/3 or 1/3 - 2/3 or 2/3 - 3/3 dimensions or 0/3 - 2/3 or 1/3 - 3/3 dimensions or something like that which caused a tiny unbalance of the Ratio of the Matter quarks and Antimatter quarks in the early Universe (3000000001:3000000000) which caused to survive a set of elementary particles. But the Universe doesn't have a process to make 32 particles at once, and the opposite 16 particles completely vanish during the process. So I think that is why sometimes matter particles make antimatter particles. I think that the quantum nature of matter has a connection to Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas. And the quantum nature of antimatter has a connection to it too, so the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas which comes under 4 elementary ghosts and another 4 with only the characters of the elementary ghosts are the two groups of elementary particles which sounds like a group of matter and a group of antimatter.

Lightbringer:

@Suresh Madusanka all of the particles and everything you talked about is just information, codes in a computer.

Suresh Madusanka:

@Lightbringer, Yes, you are correct, you can call it like that. I just tried to explain your statement mathematically.

------------------------------------------------

Roger Penrose - Did the Universe Begin?

Suresh Madusanka:

A Big Bang is a start of an Aeon (Kalpa: A great kalpa is 4 medium kalpas). Existence of the Aeons (Kalpa) in Buddhism shows a start and an end of the Universe again and again.

Buddhism explain about four quarters of the Universe from start to the end:

First quarter – time taken for this world to form. (after the Big Bang)

Second quarter – stable duration of this world where all living beings can thrive.

Third quarter – time taken for this world to be destroyed.

Fourth quarter – empty time period. (the accelerated Universe can convert the form into waves)

"A world that is a thousand times a thousandfold minor world system is called a thousand-to-the-second-power middling world system. 514 (3) A world that is a thousand times a thousand-to-the-second-power middling world system is called a thousand-to-the-third-power great world system. Ananda, the Tathagata can convey his voice as far as he wants in a thousand-to-the-third-power great world system." - The Tathagata (The Buddha) (Anguttara Nikaya The Numerical Discourse 277 |Page:314)

If the first 1000 world systems (small universe) = A Galaxy,

then the thousand-to-the-second-power middling world system (1000x1000) = Maybe the 'Dark Matter' combine groups of galaxies making a thousand-to-the-second-power middling world system (middle universe),

And then a 1000 middling world systems (1000x1000x1000) = thousand-to-the-third-power great world system (the triple thousand–great universe)

"All of the great universe [that comprises many thousands of middle and small universes] undergoes the cycle of creation and destruction," (LengthyDiscourses Page: 152)

According to Buddhist Quantum Physics there are 8 elementary ghosts (particles) called Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka). It sounds like that there are 8 invisible elementary particles with some activities as Ghosts. Those 8 different types of activities made information, atoms etc. According to my mathematical calculations the elementary particles (of the standard model in particle physics) received the nature of matter and antimatter. The Universe made only 16 elementary particles with the nature of matter and antimatter and a Higgs boson, and the Universe didn't make another 16 elementary particles with the nature of antimatter only, but maybe the Universe made another 16 elementary particles against the other 16 elementary particles which caused to annihilate each other, but when the dimensional formations used dimensions to form particles, mass and charge between dimensions or something like that caused a tiny unbalance of the Ratio of the Matter quarks and Antimatter quarks in the early Universe (3000000001:3000000000) which caused to survive a set of elementary particles. But the Universe doesn't have a process to make 32 particles at once, and the opposite 16 particles completely vanish during the process. So I think that is why sometimes matter particles make antimatter particles. I think that the quantum nature of matter has a connection to Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas. And the quantum nature of antimatter has a connection to it too, so the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas which comes under 4 elementary ghosts and another 4 with only the characters of the elementary ghosts are the two groups of elementary particles which sounds like a group of matter and a group of antimatter. - Suresh

Finding The Dimensions In The Universe Mathematically:

According to this mathematical formula: (a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2

Distance of Directions in beginning of the Universe: (+0-0)^6

= (+1-(-1))^3 x (+0.0-0.0)^3

= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas

Step 1:

i: (+1-(-1))^3 =

A: + (+1)3

B: - ((+1)3 x (-1)

C: - ((-1)2 x (+1)2))

D: + (-1)2 x (+1)

- (

E: + (+1)2 x (-1)

F: - ((+1)2 x (-1)2

G: - ((-1)3 x (+1)))

H: + (-1)3)

)) x

ii: (+0.0-0.0)^3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)

Step 2:

(+1-(-1))^3 x (+(1)-(-(1)))= 8 elementary particles x (+(1)-(-(1))) = 16 elementary particles

Output of this (+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) is nearly: (+0.5-(-0.5) +1-(-1)) x (2/3 - (1/3)xNull/(5/5) + (1/3)xNull/(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / (+Null-Null) x 1_..

According to the Standard Model of Particle Physics,

the Spin of most elementary particles = 1/2 (or 0.5)

the Charge of some Quarks = 2/3

the Charge of other Quarks = -1/3

the Charge of electrons = -1

I think my mathematical calculations clearly show a similarity to the elementary particles in the Standard Model in Particle Physics. - Suresh

ZoKevo:

Nobody reading all that bro

Suresh Madusanka:

@ZoKevo, It's fine bro. Sometimes I comment in detail to post my comments and conversation on a blog (Eg: buddhist-essentials-and-concepts blogspot).

--------------------------------------------

Suresh Madusanka:

According to Buddhism there are 6 types of consciousness:

The six types of consciousness are eye-consciousness (that is, consciousness based on the eye), ear-consciousness, nose-consciousness, tongue-consciousness, body-consciousness and mind-consciousness.

Mind is a process, and it can survive even with only one consciousness, so that is why after the death it can travel from one body to another body.

According to Buddhism there are '5 Aggregates Of Clinging' which cause to continue the mind.

(Matter or Form (rupa), Sensation or Feeling (vedana), Perception and/or cognition (sanna), Volition or Mental Formation (sankara), Consciousness (vinnana)

Edward Russell:

This is just looking at some aspects of human awareness.. its not the whole. Buddhism does not have the complete answer.. its a religion contaminated by human thought and desires..

Suresh Madusanka:

Origin of Matter – The Mind:

The origin of the smallest unit of matter, called a “suddhāṭṭhaka.” (sometimes written as suddhāshtaka).

These original suddhāṭṭhaka have lifetimes of close to 20 antakkappa (or antarākappa in Sinhala), where 80 such antakkappa are in a mahā kappa (great aeon).

When enormous numbers of these suddhāṭṭhaka fuse, they get to a more condensed state of “mahā bhūta.” The subtle bodies of Brahmā and some gandhabbā are made of mahā bhūta.

Only when vast amounts of these mahā bhūta fuse together to become even more condensed, that we can see them. At this highly condensed state, the matter is called “dhātu.” Bodies of devas are made of finer dhātu. That is why we cannot see devas, but Brahmā can see them.

Thus our bodies are made of more dense dhātu that we can see. That is why solid objects are called “Pathavi dhātu“; suddhāṭṭhaka in such solid objects have predominantly Pathavi.

The Buddha said, “manō pubbaṅgamā dhammā…”, i.e., “everything has a mind as the precursor…”.

However, almost all of the matter around us was created by this “mental process” a very long time ago. That is the story in the Aggañña Sutta. At present also, suddhāṭṭhaka are being created by us all the time (via javana citta), but in very minute quantities.

Thus instead of having a lifetime of 17 thought moments, as some people erroneously believe, a suddhāṭṭhaka has a very long lifetime.

Anyone with higher abhiññā powers is supposed to be able to create a significant amount of matter, like a flower or even larger entities. Matter (at the level of suddhāṭṭhaka) is created by javana citta. And someone with abhiññā powers can maintain a citta vithi with javana citta flowing continuously to generate “significant amounts of matter.” I briefly discussed that at the end of the post, “Citta Vithi – Processing of Sense Inputs.”

Four of these are the “satara mahā bhūta“ (The Four Great Bhūta. Bhūta is another name for “ghost” because of their elusive nature.): Pathavi (Solid/Earth), āpo (Liquid/Water), tejo (Heat/Fire), vāyo (Gas/Air). These are indeed the most fundamental units of matter, but they cannot be detected by themselves. The four mahā bhūta ('Matter') are with four basic “gati” ('Character of Matter'/ 'Antimatter'): Pathavi gati (hard/coarse), āpo gati (bound/attracted/liquidity), tejo gati (fiery or energetic), vāyo gati (motion). Thus, in Buddha Dhamma, it says, “gati (character) attracts a similar gati”.

Thus “gati” leads to “bhūta,” the first phase of rupa that can be seen (only by Buddha). That is the suddhāṭṭhaka stage. That is where mental energy is converted to matter at the very fundamental stage.

Now, the craving for these material things leads to four more gati due to taṇhā. Due to our tendency to think highly (“varnanā karanava” in Sinhala), another gati of “vaṇṇa” is created as different manifestations of the satara mahā bhūta. Similarly, three more units called gandha, rasa, and oja created due to taṇhā.

(*It sounds like that there are 8 invisible elementary particles with some activities as Ghosts. Those 8 different types of activities made information, atoms etc.)

These eight never arise in isolation and thus are called “avinibbhoga rupa.” They always rise together; all eight are there in any suddhāṭṭhaka. The relative “amounts” of each component can vary, and thus some suddhāṭṭhaka can be dominated by one element, for example. Even then, all eight are present to some extent. That is equivalent to saying that wherever there is avijjā, there is taṇhā, and vice versa.

One’s character (gati) determines one’s future births. The ability to figure that out is called the “nāmarūpa pariccēda ñāna“ (one understands how the mind is related to matter, i.e., how viññāna acts as the critical link between mind and matter.).

(*Read more about "The Origin of Matter – Suddhāṭṭhaka" at Pure Dhamma website.)

Suresh Madusanka:

@Edward Russell, According to Buddhist Quantum physics, I guess, the Brahma worlds have only 4 elemantry particles with a higgs boson in their standard model of particle physics. And maybe there are only 8 elemantry particles in the standard model of other heavenly worlds. And we have 16 elemantry particles with a higgs boson in our standard model of particle physics. Maybe there is a connection between Heavenly worlds with Dark Matter, and Brahma worlds with Dark Energy too.

----------------------------------

Sabine Hossenfelder: (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpU_e3jh_FY)

In this video I explain why free will is incompatible with the currently known laws of nature and why the idea makes no sense anyway. However, you don't need free will to act responsibly and to live a happy life, and I will tell you why.

The reference I mentioned is here:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5239816/

0:00 Intro and Content Summary

0:30 Free will as the possibility to select a future

1:21 Free will is incompatible with the laws of nature

3:02 Chaos and quantum mechanics make no difference

3:50 Free will is nonsense

4:28 Other definitions of free will

6:32 What is really going on

6:58 Reacting to a prediction is not free will

8:00 Free will is unnecessary for moral behavior

9:30 How to live without free will

Francis Vaughan:

Interestingly Roger Penrose has spent a lot of time trying to convince the world that free will exists. I had the pleasure of attending a lecture series he gave many years ago, not long after his somewhat controversial book The Emperors New Mind came out, where he expounded on his ideas, many of which he didn't really give full voice to in his book. The overwhelming insight was that he is a closet hidden variable physicist, and he believes that free will exists in part because quantum processes are not random, but have some deeper structure, one that can be tied back into the physical world. (As an example of an indeterminate but not random process he, of course, gave Penrose tiling as an example.)

I think there is a critical point to be made here. An assertion that free will cannot exist because quantum processes are truly random is implicitly asserting this randomness as a basic axiom, not just an interpretation of QM. One can argue this one forever, but it isn't yet an accepted axiom of physics, and it isn't hard to find physicists who, in their hearts, don't believe in it. Personally I won't make a call on this. We clearly don't yet know enough to assert this as undeniable truth. There is nothing that says we have to make a choice about it either.

Suresh Madusanka:

Francis Vaughan, You didn't get the point. Quantum uncertainty doesn't mean that our will is completely predicable, and we are not responsible about our will. But because of the uncertainty in our mind sometimes our mind doesn't give the output we want. And it is about the output of our will which we can't control. Our will (Chethana/Karma) has a previous cause, but that previous cause is based on our habits and practices, so even if we can't change the previous cause or will it always has a stream of habits and practices. The middle way is the answer. Training the mind from deep meditations can change the determinism, because the meditation is the best way we can change our quantum behaviour by changing deeper levels of the mind to disconnect our mind from the world around us to develop a locality inside the mind. I think if we can use our mind to change the quantum fabric of the space (quantum foam, particles etc) as much as and as far as possible then it can help to change our path. If we don't try to change our mind, then we just follow the stream of the world around us. The Buddha showed us a way to go against the stream. According to Buddhism there is a very small determinism which related habits and practices of people who continue it many life times.

Sam O:

@Suresh Madusanka Those who hold that everything is ultimately based on something material are not going to agree with your presentation, and most posters here would fall into that category. Buddhism says everything is ultimately based on something immaterial i.e. consciousness related. The law of karma is the law of causality in that immaterial realm. If the material realm does not arise from the immaterial realm then the law of karma cannot operate in the material realm. But because the material arise from the immaterial, the law of karma can operate as a physical causal law via a physical structure such as a brain. Note however that the idea in Buddhism that everything is ultimately based on something immaterial does not imply that there is one universal mind or consciousness as in Hinduism. If fact, Buddhism argues against that. If Buddhism is correct, then there is a part of reality that science can never reach and therefore explain. It is tempting to use this on free will but unfortunately for those who think in that way, the Buddhist position appears to be deterministic through and through. But Buddhism still allows for randomness and the sponstaneity of enlightened Wisdom to affect outcomes.

Suresh Madusanka:

@Sam O, You explained it very well. And I think that the Buddhism has a scientific explanation about the immaterial realm too. Accrding to Buddhism, one’s character (gati) determines one’s future births. The origin of the smallest unit of matter, called a “suddhāṭṭhaka.” Four of these are the “satara mahā bhūta“ (The Four Great Bhūta. Bhūta is another name for “ghost” because of their elusive nature.): The four mahā bhūta ('Matter') are with four basic “gati”. It says, “gati (character) attracts a similar gati”. Thus “gati” leads to “bhūta,” the first phase of rupa that can be seen (only by Buddha). That is the suddhāṭṭhaka stage. That is where mental energy (immaterial) is converted to matter at the very fundamental stage.

dlevi67:

@Suresh Madusanka Don't confuse (possibly) internally consistent with scientific.

Suresh Madusanka:

@dlevi67, Just because scientists couldn`t discover something from their technology that doesn`t make that thing not scientific. I showed the science in Buddhism, and it is not a Buddhist imagination. But scientists should try to discover it. I personally have a mathematical explanation for it too.

Finding The Dimensions In The Universe Mathematically:

According to this mathematical formula: (a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2

Distance of Directions in beginning of the Universe: (+0-0)^6

= (+1-(-1))^3 x (+0.0-0.0)^3

= ( This should be the Pure Eight (Pali: Suddhātthaka) in Buddhism: Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas, Character (Pali: Gati) Of Solid, Liquid, Heat, Gas

Step 1:

i: (+1-(-1))^3 =

A: + (+1)3

B: - ((+1)3 x (-1)

C: - ((-1)2 x (+1)2))

D: + (-1)2 x (+1)

- (

E: + (+1)2 x (-1)

F: - ((+1)2 x (-1)2

G: - ((-1)3 x (+1)))

H: + (-1)3)

)) x

ii: (+0.0-0.0)^3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)

Step 2:

(+1-(-1))^3 x (+(1)-(-(1)))= 8 elementary particles x (+(1)-(-(1))) = 16 elementary particles

Output of this (+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) is nearly: (+0.5-(-0.5) +1-(-1)) x (2/3 - (1/3)xNull/(5/5) + (1/3)xNull/(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / (+Null-Null) x 1_..

According to the Standard Model of Particle Physics,

the Spin of most elementary particles = 1/2 (or 0.5)

the Charge of some Quarks = 2/3

the Charge of other Quarks = -1/3

the Charge of electrons = -1

I think my mathematical calculations clearly show a similarity to the elementary particles in the Standard Model in Particle Physics. - Suresh

dlevi67:

@Suresh Madusanka Perfect demonstration of my point. Just because you can make something up that is internally consistent (and your gibberish isn't even consistent - "nearly" is not good enough, and a series of mathematical tautologies saying 0 = 0 can be made up with any numbers in them), it does not make it scientific.

Suresh Madusanka:

@dlevi67, The origin of the smallest unit of matter, called a “suddhāṭṭhaka.” (sometimes written as suddhāshtaka).

When enormous numbers of these suddhāṭṭhaka fuse, they get to a more condensed state of “mahā bhūta.” The subtle bodies of Brahmā and some gandhabbā are made of mahā bhūta.

Thus our bodies are made of more dense dhātu that we can see. That is why solid objects are called “Pathavi dhātu“; suddhāṭṭhaka in such solid objects have predominantly Pathavi.

According to Buddhist Quantum physics, I guess, the Brahma worlds have only 4 elementry particles with a higgs boson in their standard model of particle physics. And maybe there are only 8 elemantry particles in the standard model of other heavenly worlds. And we have 16 elemantry particles with a higgs boson in our standard model of particle physics. Maybe there is a connection between Heavenly worlds with Dark Matter, and Brahma worlds with Dark Energy too.

A Big Bang is a start of an Aeon (Kalpa: A great kalpa is 4 medium kalpas). Existence of the Aeons (Kalpa) in Buddhism shows a start and an end of the Universe again and again.

Buddhism explain about four quarters of the Universe from start to the end:

First quarter – time taken for this world to form. (after the Big Bang)

Second quarter – stable duration of this world where all living beings can thrive.

Third quarter – time taken for this world to be destroyed.

Fourth quarter – empty time period. (the accelerated Universe can convert the form into waves)

If the first 1000 world systems (small universe) = A Galaxy,

And then a 1000 middling world systems (1000x1000x1000) = thousand-to-the-third-power great world system (the triple thousand–great universe)

"All of the great universe [that comprises many thousands of middle and small universes] undergoes the cycle of creation and destruction," (LengthyDiscourses Page: 152)

dlevi67:

@Suresh Madusanka More unscientific gibberish. Please stop. You are welcome to keep your beliefs in Buddhist cosmology; just don't try to assert in any way whatsoever that they are scientifically supported. If you are interested in this kind of thing, at least read something like "The Tao of Physics" first.

Suresh Madusanka:

@dlevi67 , You repeat the same thing. And I can repeat the same thing too: "Just because scientists couldn`t discover something from their technology that doesn`t make that thing not scientific." If you can't understand it you don't know about science. I try to show that scientific side of Buddhism from my mathematical calculations: "I discovered and used the real Mathematics of the Universe to make the calculation of the start of the Universe." If you can't understand my mathematics it is not a my problem, and almost all the normal people in this world haven't used that mathematics before. But my calculations explained a lot of scientific discoverties to me. I'm still developing it to explain more scientific discoverties and Buddhist cosmology.

Time was irrelevent even after the big bang because of the high energy in the Universe both during and after the big bang. According to Quantum physics Mass makes the time, and the Higgs field can't give Mass to elementary particle even after the big bang until the Universe start to cool down, and it shows that the Mass is not a part of the calculation of the big bang, and the mass should be a sub dimension. It means that there were 2 main steps to complete in order to make the current Universe. I think these are the 2 steps of the Universe which occurred during the big bang and after the big bang according to the 6 directions and the 6 distances of the first start of the Universe: Matter x Antimatter = (+0-0)^6 - (+0-0)^6 OR (+0-0)^6 + (-0+0)^6

We can use this mathematical formula to find the dimensional vibrations in the Universe: (a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2

This is the calculation of the existing Matter: (+0-0)^6

= (+1-(-1))^3

x (+0.0-0.0)^3

The 2 steps in detail:

(+0-0)^6 =

(i.)

{

(+1-(-1))^3 =

(+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1) - ((+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3)

(+0.0-0.0)^3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)

}

(ii.)

{

(+ (+(1))(+1)3 - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1) - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)

- (+ (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1) - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) + (+(1))(-1)3)

- (+ (-(1))(+1)3 - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1) - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)

- (+ (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1) - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-(1))(-1)3)))

x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)

}

Output of this (+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) is nearly: (+0.5-(-0.5) +1-(-1)) x (2/3 - (1/3)xNull/(5/5) + (1/3)xNull/(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / (+Null-Null) x 1_..

- W. Suresh Madusanka

dlevi67:

@Suresh Madusanka That is not a mathematical representation of anything physical. Those are null identities that can be made to work with any numbers.

Suresh Madusanka:

@dlevi67, If you want to explain Quantum Physics, then you have to use the Mathematics of the Universe. There is a difference between the Quantum Reality and the Physical Reality. Quantum Reality is almost empty with vibrations, dimensions etc.

Our common knowledge about mathematics don't help us to make that calculation, because if we use a normal calculator to multiply 0 from a 0 then the result it shows is 0 ( wrong mathematics: 0x0 = 0), but in the reality if we multiply 0 from a 0 (mathematically: 0x0), then the result should be 0.0 (mathematically: 0x0 = 0.0). There is a big difference between 0 and 0.0 (Null). Real mathematics can show how forms can come from nothing (without a distance (0 distance = +0-0)) and from the infinity of the 6 directions.

We usually show directions with a distance like this (If distance from my school to my house = 1Km, then Distance = 1Km and Direction = my school to my house direction): 1km-0km = 1km. But we can show the 6 directions like this too: +0-0 left, +0-0 right, +0-0 up, +0-0 down, +0-0 front, +0-0 back. So we can calculate the thinkness of the Universe like this: (+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0)x(+0-0) = (+0-0)6

What if +0-0 can make +0.0-0.0 and +1-1? Then it should be the start of something (distance and dimensions) of the Universe.

According to this mathematical formula:

(a+b)2=a2+2ab+b2

If the, a= +0 and b= -0:

(+0-0)2 = 02 - (+1-(-1)) x 0 x 0 + 02

(+0-0)6 = (+0-0)2 x (+0-0)2 x (+0-0)2 = (+1-(-1))3 x (+0.0-0.0)3

We can write gaps of 3 directions like this to calculate a solid object: (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0)

And we can write the gaps of all the 6 directions like 2 objects like this: (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0) x (+0-0)

If you calculte those 6 virtual gaps in the Universe mathematically then you will see how the Universe make +1 distance and and -1 distance with +0.0 and -0.0.

I just show the distance like this: +0-0 because it can show a direction without using a distance. I have mentioned a gap between +0 and -0, but that gap doesn't really exist, because there no distance between it. All the 6 directions can have that +0 and -0 gaps without gaps in beginning, which just represents a direction only. But we can use those gaps to calculate 2 solid objects with three dimensions. A gap between left and right direction (+0-0) and the gap between up and down direction (+0-0) and the gap between front and back direction can make an object (like a cube). So same like that the Universe can make two objects (Matter x Character of Matter) using the 6 gaps of the 6 directions, but we can calculate it mathematically to find whether it can make a distance inside those objects or not. And those two objects should be the first two solid objects in the Universe. We can calculate it same like we calculate a solid cube. But because we converted 0 into +0-0 to show directions, we can't use 0 to calculate it, so those 2 objects can have a different shape (rounded shape).

(+0-0)3 x (+0-0)3 = Matter x Character of Matter

6 directions and the 6 distances of the first start of the Universe: (+0-0)^6 - (+0-0)^6 or Matter + Antimatter = (+0-0)^6 + (-0+0)^6

This person can read and influence mind (and he believes in Karma too): Lior Suchard - Master Mentalist: https://www.youtube.com/user/supernaturalllllllll

Mentalist Lior Suchard predicts the score of the T20 cricket game - https://youtu.be/ZEIAqqtgqiY

Divine Powers ¤¤¤ Ram Bahadur Bomjon ¤¤¤ Full Documentary: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQ7fpqPaeIc

Rare Interview About Buddha Boy: Ram Bahadur Bamjan - https://youtu.be/_DMLOeW9yYE

(I repeat: "Just because scientists couldn`t discover something from their technology that doesn`t make that thing not scientific.")

dlevi67:

@Suresh Madusanka And I repeat that just because you can use some numbers in null identities that could be built with any other number, it doesn't make the numbers or the underlying reasoning in any way "scientific". Nothing to do with technology. Now, please, go and spew your torrents of nonsense somewhere else.

Suresh Madusanka:

@dlevi67 . Some believers have a blind faith, and they don't like to explore the truth if it is against their faith.!

There are space for 6 dimensions because of the 6 directons of the Universe. I have explained how (+1-(-1))3 dimensions combined and make 8 dimensional formations including 4 dimensional forms with 3 dimensions and 4 dimensional forms with 4 dimensions. And then a 5th dimension (+1-(-1)) from this (+0.0-0.0)3 with a strange field (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) which caused to form the 6 quarks, 6 leptons, 4 forces and a strange Higgs boson in standard model in particle physics.

The Universe started from 0 with infinity of directions. In line mathematics, x = 0, y = 0, z = 0. But in 3 dimensional mathematics x = +0-0, y = +0-0, z = +0-0. Because if you show a line you should show a direction like -1 or +1, and in line mathematics we don't show a direction when we write 0. but it doesn't mean that 0 doesn't have a relative direction. So the line mathematics we usually use is not the real mathematics. Real mathematics should show directions of 0 too.

I didn't know about the standard model in particle physics when I started to make that calculation around 3 years ago. I just received 8 dimensional formations from it in the beginning, but few weeks ago I just continued that calculation to get the final result, and then I found another dimension (MASS dimension) from it which converted it into 16 dimensional formations with another things (Higgs boson).

If you can't understand mathematics, then you can't understand science too, because Mathematics are the foundation of science.

- Suresh

Bye.

dlevi67:

@Suresh Madusanka I understand mathematics well enough, thank you. You on the other hand have a complete misunderstanding of what a scientific hypothesis is or of how to use mathematics to begin to validate that hypothesis.

What you are doing - and may you continue to have fun with it - is much closer to isopsephy or gematria, and I'm sure there is a rich tradition of it in Indian religious thought. Keep doing it, but don't call it "science", because it is not.

Suresh Madusanka:

@dlevi67, If you think you can use Kilogram, Litre, Time, Distance to explain Quantum Physics, then you have a misunderstanding about Quantum physics. Most units are not fundamental, and quantum physics should be based on ratios, dimensions etc. I already have enough mathematical explanations to understand quantum physics. But maybe there are a lot of people like you who can't understand the foundations of mathematics, but without mathematics you can't talk about science. However, you replied to me very faster, so I don't think that you are a good learner.

Bye.

dlevi67:

@Suresh Madusanka I don't need to spend hours meditating on your gibberish. Good riddance to bad rubbish.

BTW, it may be of interest to you that the most essential constant in Quantum Mechanics (Planck's constant) is expressed in units of Kg * m^2/s, so if you think you cannot explain QM in terms of these units, you have another thought coming.

Suresh Madusanka:

@dlevi67, No comments. No hard feelings. I'm busy too. And I don't like to waste my time. Bye

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Bernard Carr - Why Cosmic Fine-tuning Demands Explanation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWBuVtjPhi0

Suresh Madusanka:

The Universe should be balanced if it is a natural process. So fine-tuning is natural too.

According to Quantum Physics almost all the elemantary particles don't have a single Quantum state until we interact with it to measure it, so the elementary particles are a representation of many dimensions at once, and I think it is not a wave, but it interacts like a wave too. The universe is based on dimensional interactions, and the dimensions don't have a position and a speed because of the singularity of the universe. So the physical meaning of the elemantary particles is a representation of the singularity of the early universe too. We can use the duality of the 6 directions of the universe to find the dimensions of the Universe.

The duality of 6 directions and the 6 distances of the first start of the Universe: Matter + Antimatter = (+0-0)^6 + (-0+0)^6

The early universe was a thing with nothings, so the direction of a nothing (0) thing = +0-0

What if +0-0 can make +0.0-0.0 and +1-1? Then it should be the start of something (distance and dimensions) of the Universe.

According to this mathematical formula:

(a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2

If the, a= +0 and b= -0:

(+0-0)^2 = 0^2 - (+1-(-1)) x 0 x 0 + 0^2

(+0-0)^6 = (+0-0)^2 x (+0-0)^2 x (+0-0)^2 = (+1-(-1))^3 x (+0.0-0.0)^3

If you think you can use Kilogram, Litre, Time, Distance to explain Quantum Physics, then you have a misunderstanding about Quantum physics. Most units are not fundamental, and quantum physics should be based on ratios, dimensions, virtual shapes etc. There is a difference between the Quantum Reality and the Physical Reality. Just because scientists couldn`t discover something from their technology that doesn`t make that thing not scientific. If you want to explain Quantum Physics, then you have to use the Mathematics of the Universe. I already have enough mathematical explanations to understand quantum physics. If you can't understand the real mathematics of the Universe, then you can't understand science too. Maybe there are a lot of people who can't understand the foundations of mathematics. But without mathematics you can't talk about science. Some believers have a blind faith, and they don't like to explore the truth if it is against their faith.!Accrding to Buddhism, one’s character (gati) determines one’s future births. The origin of the smallest unit of matter, called a “suddhāṭṭhaka.” Four of these are the “satara mahā bhūta“ (The Four Great Bhūta. Bhūta is another name for “ghost” because of their elusive nature.): The four mahā bhūta ('Matter') are with four basic “gati”. It says, “gati (character) attracts a similar gati”. Thus “gati” leads to “bhūta,” the first phase of rupa that can be seen (only by Buddha). That is the suddhāṭṭhaka stage. That is where mental energy (immaterial) is converted to matter at the very fundamental stage.

We can use this mathematical formula to find the dimensional vibrations in the Universe: (a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2

This is the calculation of the existing Matter: (+0-0)^6

= (+1-(-1))^3

x (+0.0-0.0)^3

The 2 steps in detail:

(+0-0)^6 =

(i.)

{

(+1-(-1))^3 =

(+1)3 - ((+1)3 x (-1) - ((-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-1)2 x (+1) - ((+1)2 x (-1) - ((+1)2 x (-1)2 - ((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-1)3)

(+0.0-0.0)^3 = (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)

}

(ii.)

{

(+ (+(1))(+1)3 - ((+(1))(+1)3 x (-1) - ((+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (+(1))(-1)2 x (+1)

- (+ (+(1))(+1)2 x (-1) - (+(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 - (+(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) + (+(1))(-1)3)

- (+ (-(1))(+1)3 - ((-(1))(+1)3 x (-1) - ((-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)2)) + (-(1))(-1)2 x (+1)

- (+ (-(1))(+1)2 x (-1) - (-(1))((+1)2 x (-1)2 - (-(1))((-1)3 x (+1))) + (-(1))(-1)3)))

x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0)

}

Output of this (+0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) is nearly: (+0.5-(-0.5) +1-(-1)) x (2/3 - (1/3)xNull/(5/5) + (1/3)xNull/(5/5)) x 0.00000 x 1_.... / (+Null-Null) x 1_..

Accrding to Buddhism, one’s character (gati) determines one’s future births. The origin of the smallest unit of matter, called a “suddhāṭṭhaka.” Four of these are the “satara mahā bhūta“ (The Four Great Bhūta. Bhūta is another name for “ghost” because of their elusive nature.): The four mahā bhūta ('Matter') are with four basic “gati”. It says, “gati (character) attracts a similar gati”. Thus “gati” leads to “bhūta,” the first phase of rupa that can be seen (only by Buddha). That is the suddhāṭṭhaka stage. That is where mental energy (immaterial) is converted to matter at the very fundamental stage.

- W. Suresh Madusanka

Current Employee:

You are smarter than me. I should believe you :)

Suresh Madusanka:

@Current Employee, You don't need to believe mathematics, but you should be intelligent enough to understand it or disprove it. Learn more about Buddhist Cosmology:

The origin of the smallest unit of matter, called a “suddhāṭṭhaka.” (sometimes written as suddhāshtaka).

When enormous numbers of these suddhāṭṭhaka fuse, they get to a more condensed state of “mahā bhūta.” The subtle bodies of Brahmā and some gandhabbā are made of mahā bhūta.

Thus our bodies are made of more dense dhātu that we can see. That is why solid objects are called “Pathavi dhātu“; suddhāṭṭhaka in such solid objects have predominantly Pathavi.

I think the Big bang is a part of the cyclic process of the Universe which has a connection with the edge of the Universe. And maybe the big bang is an illusion of the Universe which makes the Universe look very small from the destruction process by removing the Mass from the particle before the next big bang. So if that is just a temporary separation of some groups of particles (earth/sun), then maybe it has a potential to rearrange some major groups of particles (earth/sun) with nearly the same materials again. However, we can't find a good balance in the cosmic background, so it shows the existence of a previous Universe, and every big bang can change the size of the Universe. Maybe we will be able to find the process of the big bang mathematically.- Suresh

Ferdinand Kraft:

@Suresh Madusanka Sureshit hits the fan again.

Suresh Madusanka:

@Ferdinand Kraft, Proofs of Evolution already proved that the messangers of a so-called creator God was lying about the origin of the Humans and Animals: All extant members of Hominidae except humans, Neanderthals, and Denisovans have 24 pairs of chromosomes. Humans have only 23 pairs of chromosomes. Human chromosome 2 is a result of an end-to-end fusion of two ancestral chromosomes.

Humans appear to have lost a functional caspase-12 gene, which in other primates codes for an enzyme that may protect against Alzheimer's disease.

An overwhelming majority of the scientific community accepts evolution as the dominant scientific theory of biological diversity. Nearly every scientific society, representing hundreds of thousands of scientists, has issued statements rejecting intelligent design and a petition supporting the teaching of evolutionary biology was endorsed by 72 US Nobel Prize winners. Additionally, US courts have ruled in favor of teaching evolution in science classrooms, and against teaching creationism,). (professor and author Brian Alters, states that "99.9 percent of scientists accept evolution".[25] A 1991 Gallup poll found that about 5% of American scientists (including those with training outside biology) identified themselves as creationists.

(1.) 97.3% of Biological Sciences department heads accept there is no scientific controversy over evolution. 2.) Only 700 out of 480,000 earth and life scientists (0.14%) subscribe to literal biblical creationism. 3.) Acceptance of evolution tends to increase with level of education.3737

Rebirth:

Near-Death Experiences are directly connected to mind and body separation. So it is an evidence of a life after death. You can find many peer-reviewed scientific evidences from here: Near-Death Experiences – Academic Publications: virginia .edu/perceptual-studies/publications/academic-publications/near-death-experiences-academic-publications/ Check the bottom of that page to see the next pages.

Suresh Madusanka:

@Ferdinand Kraft, Some believers are not intelligent enough to recognize the shit and lies in some so-called holy books. I converted from Roman Catholic to Buddhism, and now I can clearly see the stupidity in all the Abrahamic religions.

Today (14/10/2020), I tried to find the meaning of my name. According to many languages the name SURESH sounds like SURA + ISH.

Sura means something in Buddhism, Pali, Hinduism, Sanskrit, Jainism, Prakrit, the history of ancient India, Marathi (wisdomlib.org/definition/sura).

Few definitions:

1.) Sura (सुर) refers to a group of deities in Purana and Itihasa (epic history).

2.) Sūra (सूर) is the name of an important person (viz., an Ācārya or Kavi) in Kavya (poetry)

3.) Sura (सुर) means thought about the Divine. Sura also means gods in Vaishnavism (Vaishava dharma)

4.) sura : (m.) a god; deity. | sūra (adj.) valiant; courageous. (m.) a hero; the sun in Pali-English dictionary.

5.) śūra (शूर).—m & a (S) A warrior, a hero, a valiant man. 2 Bold, brave, heroic; and, freely, magnanimous, generous, persevering OR sura (सुर).—m (S) A god or deity in Marathi-English dictionary.

6.) Śūra (शूर).—a. [śūr-ac] Brave, heroic, valiant, mighty OR Sura (सुर).— A god, deity in Sanskrit-English dictionary.

According to Buddhism there are Asuras who fight against Devas (Suras/Gods/Deities).

Deva-Asura War https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asura_(Buddhism)

ISH derived from Sanskrit word Iz (ईश्), literally means master, lord, the supreme spirit. Ish also means desire or wish (www.pitarau.com/meaning-of-ish).

SURESH = SURA + ISH = ?

Suresh Madusanka:

@Ferdinand Kraft, Only the life in Brahma worlds and the life in Heavenly worlds could exist if the Universe were not able to form the life on earth (Human world). According to Buddhism our mind use 4 elementary ghosts (active invisible particles) called Character ('gati') ghosts (Character of 4 matter particles) to make matter too, and according to Buddhism almost all the matter particles (mahā bhūta) in the universe came from an interaction of 'Gati Bhūta' ('Character of matter ghosts'/ 'immaterial particles') and the mind which works together. That is where mental energy (immaterial) is converted to matter at the very fundamental stage. So, maybe the Brahma life could form easier than other life forms from a small group of the elementary particles. And then maybe because of an evolutionary process of the brahma life the minds of brahma beings could form particles for heavenly life with a fine-tuning for heavenly life and then the minds of heavenly beings could form particles for human life with a fine-tuning for human life.! However, I think I already found the mathematical reasons for the existence of the charge of the elementary particles of the standard model in particle physics, but I'll try to find the reasons to the existence of the masses and the forces of the particles mathematically.

Ferdinand Kraft:

@Suresh Madusanka I'm not reading this crap

Suresh Madusanka:

@Ferdinand Kraft, It is your belief. That is how beliefs work. If you don't read it, you can't call it a crap. Don't try to believe a God like that.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sir Roger Penrose & William Lane Craig • The Universe: How did it get here & why are we part of it?

Dr0p _b34r_09:

Man. I love scientists/mathematicians like Roger. Open minded, respectful and humble to all. He dose not hate religion but skeptical. Everyone has a right to be so. Roger is a good man.

Suresh Madusanka:

Yes. And Buddhism supports his explanation about previous Aeons: According to Buddhism there were 70 aeons (70 big bangs) when there were no Buddhas. and again there were around 30 aeons (30 big bangs) when there were no Buddhas. Usually a Buddha appear when there are living beings, but we can understand that there are written evidence in Buddhism where clearly stated that there were previous Universes where Buddhas didn't appear. So that sounds like Buddhism talking about probability (maybe natural fine-tuning) too. And it is scientifical. The Buddha said that there were aeons more than the sands in the Ganges river (in india). Maybe, the

'Hawking Points in the Cosmic Microwave Background' shows the existence of black holes of the previous aeon.

SuperDukka:

@Suresh Madusanka

The 2,500 years Buddhist suttas also talk about the cosmos being an endless cycle of eons of cosmic expansion and eons of cosmic contraction. It calculated an eon as the time taken for soft cloth to erode one mile cube of mountain by wiping once in 100 years. It said this in relation to our cycles of birth and rebirth. Check out Ian Stevenson work on reincarnation, Raymond Moody on Near Death Experience and Brian Weiss on past live regression which all independently show human consciousness survive death and we live many lives.

Suttas also talk about cosmic spaces being so dark that no light could penetrate (black holes?). It said this in relation to human ignorance that is so dark that no light could penetrate.

It described the end of earth when the sun becomes so strong it burns up the oceans and earth.

Interestingly the sutta also said it is not possible to travel to the end of the cosmos in one's lifetime even if we travel at a speed that flash from one shore to the other shore of the ocean.

It also talk about many world systems (other solar systems?) with living beings each having many realms of existence (dimensions?).

It talk about many living beings in a cup of water though we could not see them with our eyes.

Taken together all these seem to make sense in today's world. Cheers.

Suresh Madusanka:

@SuperDukka, Yes. And I try to explain these things to people too.

----------------------------------------------------

Buddhist Essentials and Concepts

My ideas and comments on Buddhism - Page 18

Prof. B. Alan Wallace talks on “Mind, Emptiness and Quantum Physics."

WHY PEOPLE ARE LEAVING ISLAM

Faith vs. Knowing in Early Buddhism

Roger Penrose - Why Did Our Universe Begin?

Roger Penrose - Did the Universe Begin?

Sir Roger Penrose & William Lane Craig • The Universe: How did it get here & why are we part of it?

Fine Tuning Scrutinized

No comments:

Post a Comment