My thoery is not only about a 4 dimensional universe. I explain about 4 main dimensions and 1 stable sub dimension with 1 unstable dimension. I don't think Upanishads is helpful for me, because I already found some helpful details from Buddhist Abhidamma (Pure Eigh, Pure 8 + 5 senses can make more fundamental elements (Chitta), 28 material phenomena, 51 smallest moments of a matter (Rupa) area etc) and a hint from our culture about a 64 types of magics (in women). And I watch videos of the Fermilab, PBS Space Time YouTube channels etc to learn more about Quantum Physics and Universe.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae ok Suresh I am happy you at least looked at it.
From what I know Suresh Lisi crystal 🔮 models if E8 with Lie
Groups accounts for all particles in standard
Models. Thats pretty great. Plus his groups versus your own groups of forms in "0" etc has 'light in his E8 crystal and not gravity.
I like yours because it starts with your numbers and already fits standard model you said .
I am reminded of an article I read in 1995 in discover mag on the 'quantum languages of bees' in their 'forms' of dances on hives forms. As if they already knew of
.quark theory. You are like that case so. .. I think by making algebraic "0" forms as you do its more like our empty spaces in our brains consciousness when we're born.
Whereas in Lisi E8 theory he used physics own Lie groups he already knew fit std Models. His Lie groups are calculus based yours are number algebras only.
Thus I can imagine both you 2 are thinking about same theory of everything. Can of course be only 1 and you and Lisi must come out same . Lots of fun talking to you Suresh. Your very clever in languages . I am a lot older and worked in computer software and did some patents etc in nanotechnology.
Keep posting and ill see how you do bye.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae I bought the paperback of your book Suresh. Bye
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, My theory is based on time dimensions which can start from zero (0). I don't think that I need to change my theory, and it showed me many similarities to the Standard Model of Particle Physics and other things (predictable structures and particles etc) more than I can think. And received only one result from my theory which I can't change to match it with the elementary particles of the standard model, but I already found an atomic structure, higgs field, antimatter and a clear reason to think why the Up Quark is smaller than the Down Quark. And I found some groups of formations of dimensions (moments/ elementary magics) which can have charastaristics of Dark Matter. And I can guess how my theory can explain gravity too. According to my model (structure of the elementary magics) Down Quarks and Strange Quarks are different types of sets, but the Bottom Quark use the sets of both Down Quarks and Strange Quarks. Up Quark starts after the Down Quark, therefor the Top Quark reach the set of the higgs section too, but there are only 4 main sections of sets for matter with different types of starts. There are 4 main sections for antimatter too, but with a weak Higgs section. So (Today 11-2-2021) I looked at quarks to understand the decay process of those elementary particles, and then I could see that the Strange Quark doesn't decay into a Down Quark which I could predict from my sets of the elementary magics. And the Bottom Quark can decay into the nearest mass which is the Charm Quark, because those Quarks use the same sets to form those particles. I just have to give enough time to develop it and understand it. But I still didn't give enough time to think about those things, because I was busy with my business and rest.
Thank you for your replies and information.!
Bye.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn , Thank you so much if you ordered the paperback of my book. I'll be able to confirm it few days later.
Good Bye.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae any way to get you to sign a book for me I would love to have that.
I keeping tabs on you. Were very alike . YES. BOTH INTO
SOFTTWARE AND
MY PATENTS WILL DO IN HARDWARE , NANO, WHAT YOU ARE DOING IN TOE SOFTWARE.
Best of good things. Robert.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, I don't know how I can sign a book for you. Maybe I'll be able to mail a note to you. I just learned web development, so I'm not good in software development. (this is not a good place to discuss about those things on some restrictions.). However, I could see that you bought my book, so thank you so much for that. You are the first person who bought my book, so I would like to know the name of your country.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae yes, there's problems for signing books. I am glad I bought one. I live in az, USA. I think its purchased from Amazon. Lets wait, ok. Maybe someday you'll be famous. Lol 😆 I am hardware and you're software. I worked IBM.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, Thanks for trying to understand my explanations. Amazon prints and delivers my book. I have positive feelings about USA and Western countries. I guess those countries used their power to protect Asia from highly violent muslim invaders and helped Asia to establish democracy, because christianity is a peaceful religion than some christians. However, I wanted to help Buddhists and others to find answers for some important questions, because some ignorant organized groups try to argue with Buddhists using wrong information (Eg: about evolution, fabrications about the universe etc). Currently we don't have a good theory and a technology to predict the future, so we should wait and see. I can understand about your abilities. I just want to show my theory to scientists and mathematicians to develop it more to use it practically (because it should work). I don't mind even if you print copies of my book and sell or share the book for free. However, thank you so much Mr. Robert for everything.
Suresh Wanayalae:
According to my analysis the the Strange quark is a combination of the Down Quark and Up Quark sections. But the dimensions of the Down Quark is Larger than the Dimensions of Up Quark, so maybe that is why the Strange quark decays into an Up Quark. However, according to my analysis an Up Quark doesn't make larger quarks directly. Strange quarks should join with other sections to make a Charm quark too. And the Bottom Quarks should join with other sections to make a Top Quark. However, I hope to analyse it more later. Thank you. Bye for now.!
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae don't worry Suresh. Everything's fine. Already received book.
I won't do anything on your ideas at all.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, I'm glad about everything you said. However, I meant, I just want to spread that theory and explanations quickly without thinking about my benefit. I like to see people talking about it, because it can change the minds of a lot of people. And I like to see it develop more soon. Today (15-02-2021) I tried to find the position of electron and neutrino. According to my analysis I could find a formation like an electron neutrino (and the smallest electron is at the top-left corner after the higgs section). And I think there is a neutral formation at electron section and an electron volt (eV) start from a combination of 3 electron sections (electron section x 3 - 3 neutral formations - smallest electron) which can finally line up 14 formations which is like 1 eV. However, I'll try to publish my analysis later.
Thank you.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae for you to watch. See where you fit into future, Suresh.. https://youtu.be/WnKeZm2J8VQ"
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae here is 2 other points:
Check out the Indian boy
RAMANJUAN
he come from India when 19 and was
invited to oxford england earlier 2oth century 19xx by three people
1 J. Hardy. Depth math head
2 prof. Louis Mordell.
3 prof. Littlewood
They helped him publish his math. He died soon after.
I was at univ. of Arizona and met Dr.
Mordell a genius himself in number theory and was taught by him at U of A . Thats how I know.
You'll probably have to do same.
Watch this video to where you and toe fits today..
https://youtu.be/WnKeZm2J8VQ
IN VIDEO : see what dr. Frank Wilczek says. Its important for you to see. The TOE fits in to what he is now doing. He discovered part of TOE. SEE IT AND DECIDE.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, Yes, thank you so much for sending me that video. I could see the similarity clearly. He said that they need 3 numbers to describe a quibit, and I said we need 3 formations to make 1 eV, so now I think a combination of 3 smallest electron is like an quibit, and the next formation is 3x3 posibilities with 2x3 posibilites which is equal to 15 posibilities are the next formation, but I said 14 posibilities for that because I removed a smallest electron from it to compare it with the latest mass of a neutrino (0.07 eV) because 1/14 is equal to around 0.07 (0.0714), but 1/15 is equal to around 0.7 (0.666) too, so I can use those 15 posibilities without a problem. And I think those 15 posibilites are equal to 1 eV.
I hope my guess it correct. We will be able to confirm it and more things soon or later. I'll try to find details about RAMANJUAN. Thank you for your support Mr. Robert.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae you are hot on the trail of higgs fields coming apart such as dr frank wilczek thinks too.
Mass of neutrino can be 3 types in so(10) symmetry theory. Ex. Can be a Dirac relativistic electrons. Like you gave. Your basically recording in your "theory" what is called dimensional parity..like direction in emptiness.
The whole theory says when a neutron decays comes apart higgs
occur first in time. Frank Wikczek
Developed the model 20 years ago and won the nobel prize much later.
Thats why he switching to how 'mind' comes out of matter.
He is the one you'll need to pass you theory book to.
Robert
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae one last but important question about your brain processes..
Do you think it includes repulsive gravity in higgs fields or parties of the +/- 1 , o. Maybe as +/- ( i) as a sequence. Maybe infinite. This is gravity in toe. i2. = -1. The ghost or imaginary dimensions.
Give this some deep thoughts ok. No big deal if you cant.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, Sometimes I just used the word neutrino to mention the electron neutrino. I think electron neutrino interact from spin only, and electron neutrinos are not pairs because it doesn't have a dimension to make charge. Maybe a repulsive Spin which changes like 1/2 to 0.5 (dimensions) gives a repulsive (betweeen 0.5/15 to 1/15) mass (0.07 eV or ) for it. Maybe neutrnos can come aprart higgs because I think neutrinos has a repulsive relativistic spin (and maybe that process obtain energy from electrons or any other place which can create new electron neutrinos too. And then it can come out like matter comes out of mind). However, I need to study more about neutrinos.
I don't know how I can pass my theory to Dr. Frank Wikczek. However, thanks for your advise.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, Maybe the gravity is the smallest duration of time inside a smallest dimensional formation. (Eg: A smallest formation with +3 dimensions has 3 smallest moments of gravity.) I think the gravity is not a dimension, but it is a smallest momentum or a duration of a dimension (in smallest quantum level) which interacts with a result of a seperation of a universal symmetry. I think we can find gravity in everything including higgs field.
Just let me know if you have important questions. Maybe I'll not be able to answer, but we can think about posibilities. I'm just analysing, thinking and guessing to find answers by myself (Suresh).
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, Updates (and corrections) about analysis: Yesturday (21-02-2021) I could identify the correct location of the smallest electron. It is at the top-left corner after the higgs section of matter area, and it has 3 extra dimensions which makes it possible to make 1 Qubit (with 3 posibilities/directions) of it. If we take the Higgs section as the 1st section then there are two types of photons (like electro+magnetism) at the bottom of the higgs section. And there are two types of neutrinos at the last group of the 3rd section. If we take the start of the opposite side (right side) as the 1st section of the antimatter area, then I think the gluon originated from the last group of the 4th section of the antimatter area. According to the my way of calculations, a smallest Electron has a +1 Charge as (+3 +3/3). And a smallest Down Quark has a 1/3 Charge as (+3 +1/3). And a smallest Up Quark has a -2/3 Charge as -(+3 +2/3). I hope to analyse more soon or later, and maybe I'll send it to here too, but I don't expect a reply from you Mr. Robert. Thank you.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae you will get your response, Suresh.
Everything you said is Correct!
Don't give up keep going.
Gravity ie quantum gravity will be the directions on smallest of your standard tables. Codes the curvature from hadron condensed matter of quarks and gluons. That is beautiful. Codes just like dna Codes ie. 4x4x4 = 64 possible possible curvatures.. but only 21 are unique. Agrees to 64 possible amino acid codes in dna.. taken 3 at a time.. there are 21 amino acides making up dna. Just passing this to you from past things I know. Theres a book I can say later, Suresh.💫
Light come from einsteins curvature. .. call kalusza Klein idea 💡 the fifth smallest dimensions.
Everything is made from light dimensions..just like it really happened before big bang.
Changed my logo image haha
'Someone out there said "little red corvette" from Prince song of same name. Hope you like this. Robert flynn.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae the little red corvette song
https://youtu.be/v0KpfrJE4zw
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, Sometimes it is difficult for me to understand English songs etc. Thank you for your response. I was busy on my grandmother's funeral. And sometimes I take a lot of time to think before I reply. However, sometimes I collect ideas to find hints to start thinking about some difficult problems. Currently I don't have enough clues to start thinking about the process of gravity (including quantum gravity) and the speed of light. Maybe I should think about the end of the Universe and about Dark Energy before I think about the process of gravity. I don't know whether the fundamental force of gravity change (maybe relatively change) or not. Maybe the gravity has a connection with the spin of the elementary particles, and maybe the relationships with the constants make the process of gravity so complex, or maybe the gravity depends on many different types of Big Bangs etc. (I guess the next Big Bang will not make the same type of atoms. And according to Buddhism a Buddha will not appear in the next Universe (after the next big bang/ next aeon), but a Buddha will appear after the end of that Universe (around after 2 aeons)) Maybe we should know everything about the process of the Universe to explain the process of gravity and speed of light. However, there are a lot more things to think first.
Nice to know about that strucure of DNA Codes Mr. Robert.
I try to study and think about those things specially on Saturdays and Sundays. I hope I'll have enough time to think about those things soon.
I think you like to change and discover new things Mr. Robert. There are a lot of things we don't know yet, so we can't stop finding those things, but sometimes we should try to understand our limits and potentials too. Maybe our mind is able to observe and discover a lot of things better than anything else.
- Suresh Madusanka
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae it was a pleasure to hear about you, Suresh.
Your so close to the answer. Prince was a great talent in USA.
Quantum gravity.
See video coming up on
This Saturday, Suresh.
Arvin ashe. He does vids on hard subjects.
Talking about quantum gravity Saturday. Be cool. Robert
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn , Thanks for encouragements. Sometimes I watch Arvin ashe YouTube Channel, and I hope to watch his previous videos and upcoming videos too. I really like his channel so much. I'll have to learn to use planck constant and other constants with relevant theories. I hope to try to connect the 51 smallest moments of a matter area in Buddhist Abhidharma with the wave function or the plank length in quantum machanics. According to my standard model of the dimensional formations there are 48 sets of dimensions in the matter area. And there is an empty section between the matter and antimatter area. So that can make 49 smallest moments of continuation in matter area. And according to Abhidharma there are 2 smallest moments to start and end a matter area. If my standard formations represent that 51 smallest moments of a matter area then maybe it can help to answer some important questions.
I'll try to unite new and old theories to find answers. I hope we will be able to find something important Mr. Robert.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae here is the vid to watch..
Quantum holonomy theory
Ie quantum gravity
Arvin ash
https://youtu.be/fSVbWwivu5g
Send him a good complement fron you.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, That vid explains about singularity, and a little bit about Quantum Gravity. I couldn't find a dimension for gravity, but maybe the gravity has a connection with the arising (birth) and the vanishing (cease) process of a dimension (in the matter area) at the antimatter area, or between the empty section at the matter and antimatter area. That empty section doesn't have a dimensional connection between the matter area and antimatter area, so that can be the end of a dimensional interaction which behaves like gravity. And maybe a repulsion at that empty section behaves like antigravity (dark energy). And maybe there is a gap between the birth of gravity and the birth of antigravity which doesn't allow them to annihilate each other (maybe the antigravity is the start of making a dimension on repulsion at the empty section to start a standard dimension at the matter area.). Maybe the gravity goes to the infinite emptiness while antigravity comes from the infinite emptiness.
I'll try to find the mathematics of quantum gravity soon or later Mr. Robert.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae what you said is pretty interesting I thought. Basically we need more quarks!! Theory uses 1/3 +/- buts thats not enough charges for gravity sub curvatures. The are 4. There are many universes, many quarks you can't see them. Ghosts..dark matter for example need to be in everything and not there. They call it supersymmetry and infinite strings. Background before big bang . There was only a quark gluob plasma and dark higgs fields before big bang. It started to divide like birth of cells. And then big bang. Out of that cooling comes 4. Matter, dark matter. Antimatter. And, anti dark matter options. No light yet. Solid darkness almost. Nothing.
Its hard to find a spot for gravity dimensions in fact that's the unification problem, Suresh.
In the Ash video he did not into details it hard math Ash chickened out. I am studying the Memphis 3 cold case files. . New information on the killings of 3 boys in woods . Damion went to prison,, with friends in 1995. Been there tillb5 years ago wrongful conviction I think. Now 2 other boys at the time have confessed to something recently. I am interested in murder cases generally. Looked into others last 2 years. Thats another thing I do.
Ok. The answer is where you put the quarks and gluons in your model its the charges on quarks need to be more types.
Tell me where you think they go.
According to the video we watched Arvin was silent. Go back to video and look at my comment up near front and I put a link to more videos. Watch that first. It's little deeper. I hope Arvin is ok on this
Gravity is new. Part of quark dimensions... there the "smallest"
And they 4x4x4. Combination to be like dna 4 bases. You need more fractions not 1/3. But 1/5ths to agree to theory. There many, more than 3 quarks.. theres dark quarks andd may use the imaginary math signs ie. -1 to -1/2 power.. Square root. Look up imaginary numbers online to see. Math symbol is "+/ - i... fractions you need are 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5.. su(5) in quark theory.
See where these quarks get smaller or smallest sub dimensions.
We can call these new places in your tables. Repulsion.. the field lines spread out like repulsion lines. They get more and more. There are like imaginary and infinite.
You probably did not plan fir these.
But they are there and like life's coding beginnings. Thats my conjecture. In the video link in Arvin Ash in my comment.
Your up late by usa time..after 1am
I stay up late. I was looking at houses for sale in brighton Beach england. They are much $$$. The cure band lives there. Ha ha. Its really funny as one of my other youtube channel comments was answered "robert smith" lead singer and quitarist but used a secret cided id name butbi knew.
Find the quarks and gluons first and tell me where you them put them, ok. 👋
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, Nice to know about you, and I could understand what you said Mr.Robert, and I watched that video about the "The Concept of Holonomy", but I'm not smart enough (or maybe I don't have enough time) to follow that type of complex mathematics to find a reason to quantum gravity. And maybe a small misunderstanding about a curvature of a dimension can waste a lot of time, or maybe some dimensions don't curve or bend sometimes. Therefor, I think we should try to follow simple ratios and simple structures and virtual shapes first to find a something like a constant which we can use as an extension to the mathematics of the general relativity, because maybe we will be able to replace the Mass or the speed of light with something else to find a big reason to the existence of gravity, or maybe we will be able to change the current mathematics of quantum mechanics to find a small reason to a requirement to exist quantum gravity.
According to my Standard Model there are black and gray ranges which I can't explain yet. And the bottom two ranges doesn't have a normal 0.5 (1/2), because maybe it has two spins like +0.5+0.5 or sometimes as 1/2 or 0.5/1 + 0.5/1. And there are few parts at the top of my standard model which I can't expain yet, So I think maybe my standarm model will be enough to explain about Dark Matter, formation of Black Holes, Ghosts, Heavenly beings etc. Today (01-03-2021) I could see that the gluon should be originated at matter area (not in antimatter area which I mentioned before), because according to may model the gluon should should originate from a negative (-3) force with 3 positive dimensions (+(1)x(+1)x1) to balance it. And that gluon had a -1/3 charge which cancelled out on the +1 spin of it (and it can change the spin of gluon too, as changing a dimension which can cause a movement as an inward pressure) because it is at the bottom range of the matter area, which made the smallest gluon partially neutral. The smallest Up Quark should be the second set of the 1.2.4.1.1 group. And the smallest Down Quark should be the first set in the 1.2.4.1.2.1 group. The charge of the smallest Up Quark and smallest Down Quark make the protons and neutrons which eventually attract smallest electrons. However, I think the dimension of those particles in a matter area start from the antimatter area and end at the antimatter area within 51 smallest moments and it starts again with a very tiny change each time (which can happen according to the abhidharma too) as a cyclic process.
The mathematical technical aspects of the 6 main directions made my standard model with 3 main ranges which is symmetric like this 2/3, 1/3, 1/3 on 3 dimensions and also it is symmetric on the spin like this 0.5, 0.5, 1. Therefor I can't see a requirement to change my standard model. And I think I know that it will explain a lot of things even if it can take a long time to understand it. Sometimes I'm tough on my decisions because sometimes I don't have doubts about the process or path I followed. However, We will have to find a way to use it more practically. And I think we can use simple calculations to explain about the things we know, but maybe we will need complex calculations to explain about the things we don't know.
Sometimes the mass comes from interactions (Eg: the mass of electron), and maybe the smallest quarks get mass from interactions too. And maybe the mass is based on jumps between sets, groups and sections (fields) in matter area too.
I'll reply again on Saturday or Sunday Mr. Robert. Best of luck.
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn, I could see another posibility in my calculations which I ignored while making my standard model, because I wanted to make it simple and maybe we can't expect 2 posibilities at once. But If I used that posibility from another side then I could make another standard model with a very small difference to the other standard model. So maybe there are two slightly different standard models. So I'll see whether I should update my standard model with another standard model or not. It will depend on requirements, discoveries and posibilities. However, maybe my current standard model will be enough to explain a lot things. I'll reply again later Mr. Robert. I hope to think more about posibilities of my calculations. But currently I'm a little bit busy with few more things.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae ill give us both time on this.
But, I like having more than 1 std. Model. Why? You will need to connect the more than 1 std models by something NEW. May need more no. of quarks per proton or more gravity mass properties to each quark. All gravity changes.
The current std model which you are using too has only 3 quarks per proton or neutron. Right
? But the quarks have other properties like charges (but fraction 1/3 etc,,) like you said. And spins and flavors etc. This gives us every "known" particles seen in hadron collider. No gravitons. Important.
But remember.. this model does NOT
include any gravity attraction or repulsion
There are 2 known approaches I've seen. 1. To put gravity issues ie the curvatures 4x4x4, into a quantum..this called renormalization. 2. Recently, the reverse, to put the quantum eg.
Quarks. Somehow into gravity. These are called quantum tensors.
You can search on " quantum tensors" to check me out. Relativity has to change. In 1. Quantum theory ie quarks has to change.
The other case is the cases 1. and 2. Come very close but join by
Lights theory. The quarks join by
Entanglement. Velocity then must change speed of light. To allow 4 cases. Of infinity plus four signs.
You can probably now find many standard tables connected by
light in entanglements.
Why have one?? Its depending on what connecting to gravity does !!
Just one std table won't work I think but let's spent a bit on discussing these options.
Now then holonomy is new. Ash. But its been around. I had a paper on it.
What it says we start with motion like humans move.. left and right spin rotation, which are angular pieces of change. And like a spherical surface are not linear.
No such thing as linear motion. All angular spin changes approximate motions. The the video shows how this is applied to quantum theory.
So its like approach 2. Above. Check me out here. Tensors have change, and so relativity is changed. Quantum theory and quarks by holonomy theory is being written now like Arvin said. Thats why here chickened out. So here this model does not work in your simple math tables I think since you don't have symbols for 'angular ," signs. Do you?
Correct me if I err here in last comment. Ok?
Let me know when free.
Bye robert.
robert flynn:
@Suresh Wanayalae Tuesday FYI Suresh.
On question were talking about ie smaller dimensions
https://youtu.be/ZorRPAD32i4
Suresh Wanayalae:
@robert flynn , There are fixed spins (0.5 and 1) and fixed 3 dimensions (/3) in my standard model. And I included a possible or probable spin ((1/2) x2) which can interact with 3 fixed dimensions (eg: (1/2) x 2 x /3 into this 3/5), but I'm not sure about that yet. The standard charges have extra dimensions (eg: 4/3, 5/3, 6/3), and there are lower charges too (eg: 1/3, 2/3). Both Up Quarks (-(1x1x1x2/3)) and Down Quarks (1x1x2/3) have extra charges. I guess most +1 and -1 dimensions don't bend or curve, but maybe the 0.5 spin dimension bend or curve through the entire universe instantly, and it returns instantly, which we can't calculate, but maybe it can cause gravity, or if +1 and -1 spins cancelled on a dimension then it can cause gravity (or anti gravity) too. But we can't calculate those very small differences using big variables.
Maybe there is a fundamental separation between large objects (eg: Black Holes) and small objects (Eg: Atoms) like an energy barrier. And maybe we need another type of matter area (matter ranges) to explain the origination of things like Dark Matter, Black Holes, Neutron Stars, High-energy (Heavy) Cosmic Rays etc. If the mathematics of the universe make 2 standard models, then I think it can make the same type of sub atomic particles and atoms after every big bang (after every aeon). And if a force can combine those two standard models (maybe after somehow the Black Holes absorb all the dark matter or after all the Dark Matter annihilate on a mathematical symmetry of space after the Black Holes evaporate on Radiation, it can try to annihilate or shrink some areas of space too. And maybe the expansion of the edge of the universe will produce more space than matter on flattening the curvature of the expanding edge. And eventually the dimensions of space will not help to balance the symmetry of the universe.), then it can end the Universe as a cyclic process. Maybe the existing space will be a medium to help the expanding edge to come back to a starting point virtually like exchanging space with the edge of the universe during the next big bang, instantly filling the expanding edge with existing empty space, which can start to behave like Dark Energy on the influence of gravity of new matter at the expanding edge of the universe. I explained it based on 3 posible separations of a symmetry in my calculations: (+0.0-0.0)^3 become this (+(1)-(-(1))) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+0.0-0.0) and then it can change the direction converting to this (+0.0-0.0) x (0.000 - 0.000) x (+(1)-(-(1))) and then to the 3rd direction as a cyclic process. And maybe the Universe has three types of destructions like explained in Buddhism as 64 destructions by air, water and heat (collapsing a quantum strcuture of a fundamental element / collapsing a particular type of entangled dimensions in space etc) with a destruction ratio 1:7:56.
It will take time to find unknow things, but if we try to find the first step first then we will be able to find the second step too. Thanks for your information Mr.Robert.
robert flynn (.........@gmail.com): Our work on YouTube. March6 2021
Hi there Suresh;
The youtube on sabrine was blocking any further communication back to you. Set at 98 comments maybe 100 is a limit?
Let me know if you get these and we can go on from there.
Suresh Wanayalae (smlanka.lk@gmail.com):
Yes Mr. Robert, I can understand. We can communicate through email.
robert flynn (.........@gmail.com):
Sounds good.
robert flynn (.........@gmail.com): Quantum Honeybees | Discover Magazine. I read this Suresh years ago. You and I seem to see in humans in the theory of everything like bees do in dancing. Take a look robert.
https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/quantum-honeybees
Suresh Wanayalae (smlanka.lk@gmail.com):
Some habits change genes etc. And that is why we should practice good habits (including mental habits) as much as possible to control our bad genetic (and Karmic) habits. Very few religions teach us about that kind of a practice.
robert flynn (.........@gmail.com):
So true!
I recall reading on how small rodents can change the expression of their genes such as fur colors in differing life environments.
So I guess it goes both ways.
Do you practice control on habits Suresh?
I think you do.
Your claim is "theory of everything "
in your book. What if the coding of genes was a theory of. (Like the bees) everything and we don't even know how much power we have..
I suspected that.. in 1990 I did 2 new patents. In nanotechnology. To make units or maybe signs of quark or gluons maybe in nano carbon tubes when shaped like infinite design because carbon is giving life and can change genes in our nerves.
The simple (laughing) codes you are developing may make sense because they (you claim,) are t.o.e.
How did you know. Ramanjuan also knew something , right, about math no one knew. I was somewhat friends at U of A. (Arizona) with Dr. Louis Mordell. Dr. Mordell was one of 3 who brought Ramanjuan to oxford univ in early days. Before my time, but he told me in 1964 at school. I was 16. Then he was70 .
They wanted to know how he knew.
About infinite. Secrets.
You mention that in your book.
Can you elaborate.
This way to communicate works.
Suresh Wanayalae (smlanka.lk@gmail.com):
Yes Mr. Robert, I try to control my habits in many ways. Usually most of us try to stay away from some influences to prevent continuing some bad habits. And sometimes if I had a bad thought on a habit then I try to replace the next thought with something opposite to it instantly. And sometimes I listen to good meditations (Eg: Mindfulness meditation with Loving-Kindness meditation) to make good thinking patterns when I don't have enough time to meditate. But if we work hard, then sometimes I think we have to compromise with some small bad habits (Eg: over eating, sleeping more than 8 hours per day, over talking or not talking with some people etc) for a short period of time to remove physical stress and influences quickly. And usually I try to use a lot of time to think and I try to follow at least the 5 precepts in Buddhism when I make habits.
If there is a part of our mind at least more than 0% or around 1% outside our genes and brain then maybe we all are connected with each other and maybe we can share our knowledge subconsciously too. And if it is possible then maybe we can develop a state of mind to understand a lot of things which others discovered, but according to Buddhism someone should practice a lot of habits for a long period of time to understand and experience the theory of everything.
I could read about Ramanjuan in wikipedia. And I could understand some important facts in his life which could lead him to think differently, and I guess he voluntarily wanted to do something better for society than worrying about himself (inherited bad health condition).
If there are hidden causes which we can discover on interactions of those causes, then we should try to find all the explanations about different types of possibilities to analyse and imagine those things with our common sense to select best possibilities. As an example, If there is something like a relatively stable distance for each universe (after every big bang), then maybe we will be able to remove some units (like time) from our constants to find a ratio with a distance to use it to measure other things to find the process of unknown things like gravity, dimensional interactions etc. I guess there is a constant like this 5.560725709696455x10^51m which is larger than the radius of the observable universe, and maybe that distance is larger than the radius of the current entire universe until the expansion of the entire universe exceeds that distance.! Maybe we will be able to find a neutral constant which we can use to connect ratios of the universe with the standard constants of the universe.!
And if we can understand how time works then maybe we will be able to understand how we can learn from both past and future too. Because if there is something which must happen in the future then maybe we can prepare to find it with notions of it, and then maybe that future itself can lead us to find it.!
- Suresh (09-03-2021)
No comments:
Post a Comment
We highly admire your helpful comments on our posts.